12.07.2015 Views

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thought</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reality</strong> <strong>in</strong> Hegel’s <strong>System</strong>/33process as one of simple negation, which passes from content to contentwithout be<strong>in</strong>g any the richer for its w<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>gs; it forever pursues a goalwhich eternally lies beyond its grasp. Hegel, on the contrary, views theprocess, not as one of mere negation, but as one of determ<strong>in</strong>ate negation;one which “holds fast the positive <strong>in</strong> the negative,” <strong>in</strong>cludes itscontent with<strong>in</strong> itself, <strong>and</strong> passes by means of the negative <strong>in</strong>to a highersynthesis <strong>in</strong> which is preserved the truth of the mediated factors. 84And this br<strong>in</strong>gs us to a consideration of negation, that aspect ofthought which gives it its possibility as a mediat<strong>in</strong>g activity. I th<strong>in</strong>k itmay be justly said that an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of this Hegelian conception isabsolutely essential to a correct appreciation of the system. As the authorhimself says more than once, it is the very soul <strong>and</strong> vitality of thedialectic; it is that by virtue of which the dialectic leads us to the concretefullness of the Absolute Idea itself. Let us first try to grasp itssignificance, <strong>and</strong> we shall then be <strong>in</strong> a position to see how it has beenmisunderstood. It has been said that <strong>in</strong> order to underst<strong>and</strong> Hegel properlyone must read him backwards. This is nowhere more imperativethan <strong>in</strong> an attempt to see what he means by the negative <strong>in</strong> thought. Hetells us <strong>in</strong> the Logic, “To mediate is to take someth<strong>in</strong>g as a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> to go onward to a second th<strong>in</strong>g: so that the existence of this secondth<strong>in</strong>g depends on our hav<strong>in</strong>g reached it from someth<strong>in</strong>g elsecontradist<strong>in</strong>guished from it.” 85 But this is by no means all there is to theprocess as Hegel def<strong>in</strong>es it. He ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s further that this “developmentof one th<strong>in</strong>g out of another means that what appears as sequel <strong>and</strong> derivativeis rather the absolute prius of what it appears to be mediatedby.” 86 In this statement we f<strong>in</strong>d set forth, it would seem, the fundamentalaspect of the dialectical method: at any rate, here we f<strong>in</strong>d given usthe right po<strong>in</strong>t of view for regard<strong>in</strong>g the process. That which comes firstf<strong>in</strong>ds its explanation <strong>in</strong> what follows; what seems to be product is reallyground; truth is a last result <strong>and</strong> not a first pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. Mediation is thusa passage from one object to another which takes place by simply mak<strong>in</strong>gexplicit the <strong>in</strong>ner connection <strong>and</strong> the essential oneness of the objects.This po<strong>in</strong>t we have already dwelt upon above.Assum<strong>in</strong>g now this po<strong>in</strong>t of view, we are <strong>in</strong> a position to see whatHegel means by the significance <strong>and</strong> power of the negative <strong>in</strong> thought.Simple relation to another is, for Hegel, negation: <strong>in</strong> so far as an objectrefers beyond itself it <strong>in</strong>volves negation. From this it follows that everyth<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>volves negation, that is, every f<strong>in</strong>ite object; for by its very natureevery f<strong>in</strong>ite object refers beyond itself. Hence the potency of negation <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!