12.07.2015 Views

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thought</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reality</strong> <strong>in</strong> Hegel’s <strong>System</strong>/43diacy of reality with the abstractions of science. For the process of mediation,as Hegel def<strong>in</strong>es it, is a process of determ<strong>in</strong>ate negation whichreduces experience to an ordered <strong>and</strong> systematic whole; it affirms aswell as denies, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>deed affirms by deny<strong>in</strong>g. In short, it is the pr<strong>in</strong>ciplewith<strong>in</strong> experience which makes of experience a cosmos <strong>and</strong> not a chaos.A completely mediated immediacy, that is, reality, is, therefore, justcompletely organized experience. This negative with<strong>in</strong> thought is notmerely negative; it is a negative which annuls the false immediacy onlybecause it is ever lead<strong>in</strong>g us onwards to the true immediacy. The manycriticisms which are directed aga<strong>in</strong>st Hegel on this po<strong>in</strong>t overlook thisfact, <strong>and</strong> unwarrantedly assume that he means by negation abstract contradiction.Chapter III.Ontology <strong>and</strong> Epistemology.The conclusions of the two preced<strong>in</strong>g chapters have led us to a furtherproblem which we shall here be forced to face. If it be true that thoughtdoes <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of fact express the nature of th<strong>in</strong>gs, then it would seem tofollow that the science of thought is the science of th<strong>in</strong>gs, that ontology<strong>and</strong> epistemology co<strong>in</strong>cide. In this connection two questions arise: DoesHegel identify the two? And if so, what does he mean by the identification<strong>and</strong> what justification is there for it? It is to the task of answer<strong>in</strong>gthese questions that we now address ourselves.To the first of the above questions there can, I th<strong>in</strong>k, be only oneanswer. Hegel does identify logic <strong>and</strong> metaphysics. In the first place, wehave his own explicit statement on the po<strong>in</strong>t. S<strong>in</strong>ce thoughts are “Objective<strong>Thought</strong>s,” he says, “Logic therefore co<strong>in</strong>cides with metaphysics,the science of th<strong>in</strong>gs set <strong>and</strong> held <strong>in</strong> thoughts — thoughts accreditedable to express the essential reality of th<strong>in</strong>gs.” 106 Besides such an explicitstatement, one might offer as evidence the whole logical bias ofthe Hegelian philosophy which is unquestionably towards this identification.S<strong>in</strong>ce the categories “really are, as forms of the Notion, the vitalspirit of the actual world,” 107 <strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce th<strong>in</strong>gs or objects which do notagree with them are accidental, arbitrary, <strong>and</strong> untrue phenomena; 108s<strong>in</strong>ce the universal aspect of the object is not someth<strong>in</strong>g subjective attributedto it only when it is an object of thought, but rather belongs to<strong>and</strong> expresses its essential nature, it follows that the science which hasto do with these universals is ipso facto the science of reality. This sci-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!