12.07.2015 Views

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RU <strong>486</strong>United States, it stated: ‘This is not an abortion issue; this isan issue of scientific research for a drug that can be useful formany different medical problems’ (Lee, 1990:2). TheAssociation feared that women’s health activists would importthe drug, <strong>and</strong> delegates supporting the resolution lamentedthat the drug would be used without proper medicalsupervision. The other side of this fear is that RU <strong>486</strong>/PGwould be launched outside the parameters of medical control.The push for medical control of abortion is in keepingwith the historical position of doctors in the west toward allforms of reproductive technologies, including birthing <strong>and</strong>birth control, as well as abortion methods. Historically, itwas the medical lobby that influenced law <strong>and</strong> public policy,keeping birth control <strong>and</strong> abortion under the control ofphysicians. Robert Dickinson, a leading advocate forgynecologists in the early 20th century, who promotedcontraception with Margaret Sanger, urged his physiciancolleagues to keep birth control in their own h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> notlet it go to the radicals (Gordon, 1976:249–300). The radicals,of course, were mostly women who were dem<strong>and</strong>ing birthcontrol along with political <strong>and</strong> legal change. Many of thesewomen succumbed to the pressure promoting physiciancontrol <strong>and</strong> the strict medicalization of birth control.Ultimately, when birth control was approved in the UnitedStates, legislation m<strong>and</strong>ated that only doctors could import,mail, <strong>and</strong> dispense it.Reproductive technological history seems to be repeatingitself. The current feminist campaigns for abortion <strong>and</strong> forRU <strong>486</strong>/PG seem confined in this same straitjacket ofadvocating for abortion choices for women, but within theboundaries established by the medical profession <strong>and</strong>population planners. Population organizations, such as thePopulation Crisis Committee <strong>and</strong> the Population Council,the developer of Norplant, have sponsored research on RU<strong>486</strong>/PG <strong>and</strong> are promoting its distribution.Of concern is the current promotional collaboration116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!