12.07.2015 Views

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Is RU <strong>486</strong> <strong>and</strong> How Does It Work?an independent—<strong>and</strong> unknown—mode of action in additionto its progesterone receptor blocking qualities (Wolf et al.,1989:189). 15 As Shi <strong>and</strong> Zhu put it:Early reports emphasized the local direct effect of RU <strong>486</strong>at the progesterone receptor level in the uterus…However, the present study suggests that RU <strong>486</strong> <strong>and</strong>progesterone compete with one another at the levels ofuterus, pituitary <strong>and</strong> hypothalamus, supporting thehypothesis that RU <strong>486</strong> interrupts early pregnancy <strong>and</strong>induces menses by a multiple mode of action (1990:126; ouremphasis).RU <strong>486</strong> has also been tested as a menstrual inducer whenadministered before a missed period. However, when usedto induce menstruation, the drug’s failure rates are high, e.g.two out of eleven women had ongoing pregnancies (vanSanten <strong>and</strong> Haspels, 1987). In another study whichadminstered two doses of RU <strong>486</strong> to 12 women (the first onthe day of the expected menses, the second eight days later),22 pregnancies in 137 cycles (16%) occurred. (The unethicalnature of this experiment is staggering!) The researchersconcluded that ‘because of the high failure rate, use of RU<strong>486</strong>…cannot be advocated as a “once a month contraceptive”’(Couzinet et al., 1990:1039). These failure rates also ruleout i ts accep tability as a morning-after pill. Moreover, becauseof its long <strong>and</strong> still undetermined half-life, it interferes withthe next cycle, ‘causing delay of follicular maturation <strong>and</strong>then disturbing periodicity’ (Baulieu, 1988b: 127). In anexperiment with RU <strong>486</strong> tampons used with monkeys, IVFresearcher, Gary Hodgen, 16 states that ‘After RU <strong>486</strong>administration, the next ovarian cycle <strong>and</strong> ovulation wereoften delayed, sometimes for several weeks’ (1985: our emphasis).Baulieu himself suggests, ‘…one now needs a compound oran association of compounds acting for a relatively short timein order to avoid spill-over in the next ovulation’ (idem.).73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!