12.07.2015 Views

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

Ru 486 Misconceptions Myths and Morals - ressourcesfeministes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER FOURThe Role of Prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins:Known <strong>and</strong> Unknown DangersDiscussion of the abortion pill solely in terms of RU <strong>486</strong> isno longer possible. In what we see as a contrived protocol,RU <strong>486</strong> advocates now prescribe a prostagl<strong>and</strong>in (PG)medication, two to three days after the RU <strong>486</strong> pills havebeen swallowed, to reduce its abortion failures from 40 percent to the present figure of five per cent. While PGs partlysalvage the reputation of RU <strong>486</strong> as an ‘effective’ abortionpill, they subtract from any claim that RU <strong>486</strong> is ‘safe’. PGsare by no means new to chemical abortion, having a dubioushistory that spans more than 20 years. As early as 1972, aProstagl<strong>and</strong>in Task Force was established by the World HealthOrganization’s (WHO) Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Programme of Research,Development <strong>and</strong> Research Training in HumanReproduction. The investigations of the Task Force werethe initial, wide-scale venture into chemical abortion. Notunexpectedly, the agenda that justified the Task Force’sexistence, together with its funding, was population controlvia the application of PG to the post-conceptional regulationof fertility. Not unexpectedly either, it was women fromvarious Asian countries who were the specified ‘targets’.The following sections contain information about PGs,first to acknowledge the complexities of these powerful80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!