12.07.2015 Views

acfe fraud prevention check-up - BKD

acfe fraud prevention check-up - BKD

acfe fraud prevention check-up - BKD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACFE Insights - ACFE Insightshttp://www.<strong>acfe</strong>insights.com/<strong>acfe</strong>-insights/2012/8/10/the-most-effective-controls-in-limiting-fr...Page 1 of 35/15/2013The Most Effective Controls in Limiting Fraud LossesFriday, August 10, 2012 at 09:26AMMandy Moody in CFE Credential, Compliance & Ethics, Corporate Governance, Fraud Resources, <strong>acfe</strong>, <strong>fraud</strong>, global<strong>fraud</strong> survey, report to the nationsGUEST BLOGGERJohn Warren, J.D., CFEACFE Vice President and General CounselOne of the most important things we try to accomplish with our global <strong>fraud</strong> study, the Report to theNations, is to identify key characteristics about organizations that have been victimized byocc<strong>up</strong>ational <strong>fraud</strong>. Although every business is vulnerable to <strong>fraud</strong>, the more we can learn aboutorganizations that suffered <strong>fraud</strong>s in the past, the more information we will have to preventocc<strong>up</strong>ational <strong>fraud</strong> or at least limit its impact in the future.Perhaps the most important victim data contained in the Report to the Nations is the information wegather on anti-<strong>fraud</strong> controls. We ask each of our respondents to tell us which, if any, of 16 commonanti-<strong>fraud</strong> measures were utilized by the victim organizations while the <strong>fraud</strong>s were occurring. Wethen compare the losses based on whether a particular control was or was not present. For example,in 2012 we found organizations that used a hotline experienced a median loss of $100,000 perocc<strong>up</strong>ational <strong>fraud</strong> case, while organizations that did not use a hotline had a median loss of$180,000. This analysis gives us a general indication of the impact various anti-<strong>fraud</strong> controls havein limiting <strong>fraud</strong> losses. We can say, for instance, that the presence of a hotline was associated with a44.4 percent lower median <strong>fraud</strong> loss.In the table below, we’ve presented the results of this analysis for each edition of the Report to theNations dating back to 2008. For each anti-<strong>fraud</strong> measure, you can see the reduction in <strong>fraud</strong> lossesit was associated with, along with its ranking relative to other controls.[1]One interesting thing tonote is that every one of these controls was associated with lower <strong>fraud</strong> losses in all three editions ofthe Report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!