12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1.1 Land TenureThe two federal legal <strong>in</strong>struments govern<strong>in</strong>g land tenure were substantively curtailed by a 1990Federal Shariat Court rul<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>validated specified provisions restrict<strong>in</strong>g land hold<strong>in</strong>gs as un-Islamic (see 5.2.1 below). Other provisions of these two legal <strong>in</strong>struments rema<strong>in</strong> operative.5.1.1.1 Land ReformsAct 1997The objective of this act was to br<strong>in</strong>g about a more equitabledistribution of land for the benefit of tenant farmers. The law fixeda ceil<strong>in</strong>g on the area of land that may be owned. The provisions ofthis act were challenged before the Federal Shariat Court. In 1990,the Court ruled that ceil<strong>in</strong>gs on land hold<strong>in</strong>gs were aga<strong>in</strong>st the<strong>in</strong>junctions of Islam, <strong>in</strong>validat<strong>in</strong>g Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7(5), 8, 9, 10,and 11–17. Those portions of Section 7 that rema<strong>in</strong> valid prescribeprocedures for mak<strong>in</strong>g declarations of land ownership. Sections18–27 concern<strong>in</strong>g the Federal Land Commission also rema<strong>in</strong> valid,as do the procedural provisions of Chapters VII and VIII. Provisionson jo<strong>in</strong>t hold<strong>in</strong>gs (Sections 22 and 23) and on alienation (Section24) also rema<strong>in</strong> valid pend<strong>in</strong>g future decision of the court.5.1.1.2 Land ReformsRegulation 1972The preamble to these regulations mentions Islam and justifies theredistribution of land on religious grounds. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, theseregulations place certa<strong>in</strong> restrictions on the ownership andpossession of land. Nevertheless, the provisions of theseregulations were also challenged before the Federal Shariat Courtwhich, <strong>in</strong> 1990, <strong>in</strong>validated most of the substantive provisions onthe grounds that they were aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>in</strong>junctions of Islam.Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 18 and 25(3)(d) were <strong>in</strong>validated <strong>in</strong>their entirety. Sections 2(7), 15, 16, 17, 19, 20 and 25(1) were<strong>in</strong>validated with respect to specified conditions. The sections of theregulations that rema<strong>in</strong> valid concern land commissions (Sections4–6), the exchange of land among family members (Section 11),declarations of land ownership (Section 12), land grants to tenants(Section 18), the rights of tenants (clauses of Section 25 that werenot <strong>in</strong>validated <strong>in</strong> whole or <strong>in</strong> part), the use of land recovered fromuniversities and certa<strong>in</strong> charitable <strong>in</strong>stitutions (Section 21), and theprocedural provisions of Section 3 and Parts VIII and IX.5.1.2 Forests, Timber<strong>Law</strong>s govern<strong>in</strong>g this sector regulate the exploitation of forest resources or impose restrictions on theuse of certa<strong>in</strong> forests <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terest of national security. There is currently no federal law thatprovides a framework for the management of forests as ecosystems or landscapes, for theirconservation as habitats for wild flora and fauna, or for the protection of rare or threatened forestspecies.05NaturalResources32<strong>Environmental</strong><strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>FederalWhen <strong>Pakistan</strong> ga<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>dependence from British rule <strong>in</strong> 1947, the Forest Act 1927 was <strong>in</strong> forceacross most of the country, except for northern Balochistan (to which the Balochistan ForestRegulation 1890 was applicable). The 1927 Act was subsequently extended to the PATA of Chitral,Dir, Kalam, Malakand and Swat (1974). There is no s<strong>in</strong>gle legal <strong>in</strong>strument that extends the ForestAct 1927 to all of the Northern Areas but by 1991 a series of notifications had extended the ForestAct to all of the Northern Areas. The law does not apply to FATA which covers 2.76 million hectares

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!