12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

Environmental Law in Pakistan - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

import or possession of any material deemed to be of “sodangerous character [sic]” that it is “expedient for the public safety”to impose such restrictions (Section 6). Under this law, themaximum penalty for illegally manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, possess<strong>in</strong>g orimport<strong>in</strong>g explosives is 5,000 rupees.The government may declare any substance deemed particularlydangerous to life or property, ow<strong>in</strong>g to its explosive properties, orany of the processes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> its manufacture to be an explosivewith<strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g of this act (Section 17). Such materials may<strong>in</strong>clude a wide range of chemical substances that are explosive <strong>in</strong>nature, although the term “dangerous” itself has not been def<strong>in</strong>ed.No regulatory compliance measures are <strong>in</strong>troduced for thehandl<strong>in</strong>g of hazardous materials.6.2 Court Decisions6.2.1 Pollution of Environment Caused by Smoke, Emitt<strong>in</strong>g Vehicles,Traffic Muddle (HR No. 4-K of 1992), 1996 SCMR 543This <strong>in</strong>terim order issued by the Supreme Court calls for measures to streaml<strong>in</strong>e the process ofcheck<strong>in</strong>g motor vehicles <strong>in</strong> Karachi, as a first step towards elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g air and noise pollution <strong>in</strong> thecity. The order is based on reports from mobile check<strong>in</strong>g carried out <strong>in</strong> 1992–93, also at the orderof the Supreme Court.6.2.2 <strong>Environmental</strong> Pollution <strong>in</strong> Balochistan (HR No. 31-K/92(Q)),PLD 1994 SC 102The Supreme Court takes suo moto action <strong>in</strong> this case, after see<strong>in</strong>g a report <strong>in</strong> a daily newspaperwhich stated that nuclear waste was to be dumped <strong>in</strong> coastal areas of Balochistan. The Court viewsthis as a violation of Article 9 of the Constitution and orders the chief secretary of Balochistan toconduct an <strong>in</strong>quiry to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether coastal land <strong>in</strong> that prov<strong>in</strong>ce, or <strong>in</strong> any area with<strong>in</strong> theterritorial waters of <strong>Pakistan</strong>, had been or was be<strong>in</strong>g allotted to any persons for the purpose ofconvert<strong>in</strong>g such areas <strong>in</strong>to a dump site. If any such allotment had been made or applied for, fullparticulars were to be supplied to the Court.The Court orders that authorities with responsibility for allott<strong>in</strong>g coastal land <strong>in</strong>sert a condition <strong>in</strong> thelegal document grant<strong>in</strong>g an allotment provid<strong>in</strong>g that the allottee shall not use the land for dump<strong>in</strong>g,treat<strong>in</strong>g, bury<strong>in</strong>g or destroy<strong>in</strong>g by any device waste of any nature <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial or nuclearwaste <strong>in</strong> any form, and that the Balochistan Development Authority should obta<strong>in</strong> a similarundertak<strong>in</strong>g from those to whom land has already been allotted.06Processes andInstitutions72<strong>Environmental</strong><strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>Federal6.2.3 General Secretary, West <strong>Pakistan</strong> Salt M<strong>in</strong>ers Labour Union,Khewra, Jhelum v. Director Industries and M<strong>in</strong>eral Development,Punjab, Lahore (HR No. 120 of 1993), 1994 SCMR 2061The petitioners seek enforcement of the right of area residents to clean water, free of pollution fromcoal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g carried out <strong>in</strong> the same water catchment area. It is alleged that if the m<strong>in</strong>es areallowed to cont<strong>in</strong>ue their activities, which extend <strong>in</strong>to the catchment area, the water course,reservoir and the pipel<strong>in</strong>es will be contam<strong>in</strong>ated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!