- Page 6:
IntroductionSocial media benefits:
- Page 10 and 11:
Social Media Issues: Students & Par
- Page 12 and 13:
Legal ToolsNot-so-helpful precedent
- Page 14 and 15:
Tips1. Review/revise computer use p
- Page 16 and 17:
Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
- Page 18 and 19:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Signif
- Page 20 and 21:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Defini
- Page 22 and 23:
Halliburton Group Canada Inc. v. Al
- Page 24 and 25:
Quinn v. New Brunswick, 2011 NBQB 1
- Page 26 and 27:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Quinn
- Page 28 and 29:
Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 30 and 31:
Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 32 and 33:
Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 34 and 35:
Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
- Page 36 and 37:
Budget News - Pension• Reform mea
- Page 38 and 39:
Budget News - PensionJSPPs (cont’
- Page 40 and 41:
Budget News - PensionUniversity Pla
- Page 42 and 43:
Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
- Page 44 and 45:
Highlights• Executive Compensatio
- Page 46 and 47:
Executive Compensation• Base sala
- Page 48 and 49:
Collective Bargaining• No wage fr
- Page 50 and 51:
Collective Bargaining• To increas
- Page 52 and 53:
Communicating During BargainingMich
- Page 54 and 55:
Collective Bargaining 2012 - ETFO A
- Page 56 and 57:
College Academic Bargaining• Prop
- Page 58 and 59:
Employer Can Communicate During Bar
- Page 60 and 61:
Cannot Circumvent Union• Kingston
- Page 62 and 63: Context Is Everything• Forinteck
- Page 64 and 65: Communicating During BargainingMich
- Page 66 and 67: Duty to Respond - General Principle
- Page 68 and 69: Case Study 1: Nelson v. Lakehead Un
- Page 70 and 71: Case Study 3: Miraglia v. Universit
- Page 72 and 73: Harassment and Discrimination Polic
- Page 74 and 75: Accessibility for Ontarians with Di
- Page 76 and 77: IAS: Select Standards - 2012 and 20
- Page 78 and 79: IAS: Select Standards - 2015 to 202
- Page 80 and 81: AODA - Project Planning• over 20
- Page 82 and 83: ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
- Page 84 and 85: Arbitration• The Faculty Associat
- Page 86 and 87: Results1) Adjudicator held that the
- Page 88 and 89: ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
- Page 90 and 91: Overview1. Solicitor/Client Privile
- Page 92 and 93: 1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 94 and 95: 1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 96 and 97: 1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
- Page 98 and 99: 2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
- Page 100 and 101: 2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
- Page 102 and 103: 2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
- Page 104 and 105: 2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
- Page 106 and 107: 3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
- Page 108 and 109: 3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
- Page 110 and 111: 3. Dublin v. Montessori, 2006 (ON S
- Page 114 and 115: 3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
- Page 116 and 117: 3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
- Page 118 and 119: 3. Lana v. University of Alberta, 2
- Page 120 and 121: 4. Who is the client?• Privileged
- Page 122 and 123: 4. Who is the client?• Where the
- Page 124 and 125: 4. Who is the client?• Difficulti
- Page 126 and 127: 4. Who is the client?• Issues tha
- Page 128 and 129: 4. Who is the client?• Does in-ho
- Page 130 and 131: Solicitor/Client Privilege in theUn