Emerging Challenges in the University Sector: - Hicks Morley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AODA – Project Planning• over 20 standards 2012-2021 (excluding transportationstandards)• University-wide and significant impact:• teaching• operations: e.g. health and safety, informationtechnology, student services, human resources, libraries• internal, COU, and Ministry resourcesEmerging Challenges in the University Sector:Staying a step ahead – March 28, 2012
AODA – The Road to ComplianceLeola W. PonEmerging Challenges in the University Sector:Staying a step ahead – March 28, 2012
Page 6:
IntroductionSocial media benefits:
Page 10 and 11:
Social Media Issues: Students & Par
Page 12 and 13:
Legal ToolsNot-so-helpful precedent
Page 14 and 15:
Tips1. Review/revise computer use p
Page 16 and 17:
Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
Page 18 and 19:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Signif
Page 20 and 21:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Defini
Page 22 and 23:
Halliburton Group Canada Inc. v. Al
Page 24 and 25:
Quinn v. New Brunswick, 2011 NBQB 1
Page 26 and 27:
Reducing Pension Benefits• Quinn
Page 28 and 29:
Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
Page 30 and 31: Retiree Benefits - Vesting Revisite
Page 36 and 37: Budget News - Pension• Reform mea
Page 38 and 39: Budget News - PensionJSPPs (cont’
Page 40 and 41: Budget News - PensionUniversity Pla
Page 42 and 43: Pension and Benefits:Changing Lands
Page 44 and 45: Highlights• Executive Compensatio
Page 46 and 47: Executive Compensation• Base sala
Page 48 and 49: Collective Bargaining• No wage fr
Page 50 and 51: Collective Bargaining• To increas
Page 52 and 53: Communicating During BargainingMich
Page 54 and 55: Collective Bargaining 2012 - ETFO A
Page 56 and 57: College Academic Bargaining• Prop
Page 58 and 59: Employer Can Communicate During Bar
Page 60 and 61: Cannot Circumvent Union• Kingston
Page 62 and 63: Context Is Everything• Forinteck
Page 64 and 65: Communicating During BargainingMich
Page 66 and 67: Duty to Respond - General Principle
Page 68 and 69: Case Study 1: Nelson v. Lakehead Un
Page 70 and 71: Case Study 3: Miraglia v. Universit
Page 72 and 73: Harassment and Discrimination Polic
Page 74 and 75: Accessibility for Ontarians with Di
Page 76 and 77: IAS: Select Standards - 2012 and 20
Page 78 and 79: IAS: Select Standards - 2015 to 202
Page 82 and 83: ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
Page 84 and 85: Arbitration• The Faculty Associat
Page 86 and 87: Results1) Adjudicator held that the
Page 88 and 89: ACADEMIC FREEDOMCustody and Control
Page 90 and 91: Overview1. Solicitor/Client Privile
Page 92 and 93: 1. Solicitor/Client Privilege: Prin
Page 98 and 99: 2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
Page 100 and 101: 2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
Page 102 and 103: 2. Practical Example of Rule 2.03
Page 104 and 105: 2. Rules of Professional Conduct: R
Page 106 and 107: 3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
Page 108 and 109: 3. Managing Communication Pitfalls
Page 110 and 111: 3. Dublin v. Montessori, 2006 (ON S
Page 112 and 113: 3. Dublin v. Montessori, 2006 (ON S
Page 114 and 115: 3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
Page 116 and 117: 3. Kaganovsky v. 2057057 Ontario In
Page 118 and 119: 3. Lana v. University of Alberta, 2
Page 120 and 121: 4. Who is the client?• Privileged
Page 122 and 123: 4. Who is the client?• Where the
Page 124 and 125: 4. Who is the client?• Difficulti
Page 126 and 127: 4. Who is the client?• Issues tha
Page 128 and 129: 4. Who is the client?• Does in-ho
Page 130 and 131:
Solicitor/Client Privilege in theUn
show all

Emerging Challenges in the University Sector: - Hicks Morley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?