12.07.2015 Views

Enforcing the Competition Law in Namibia A Toolkit - cuts ccier

Enforcing the Competition Law in Namibia A Toolkit - cuts ccier

Enforcing the Competition Law in Namibia A Toolkit - cuts ccier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CROSS-BORDER ISSUESThe <strong>Competition</strong> Act of <strong>Namibia</strong> does not explicitly deal with <strong>the</strong> crossborderissues mentioned above. However, it important to stress that <strong>the</strong> Actapplies to all economic activity with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Namibia</strong> or hav<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>in</strong> <strong>Namibia</strong>(Section 3 sub. 1 of <strong>the</strong> Act). Thus, <strong>the</strong> Act opens up to cross-border issues,as <strong>the</strong> “effects doctr<strong>in</strong>e” is embodied <strong>in</strong> this provision.Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is advisable that <strong>Namibia</strong> go slow on extra-territorialjurisdiction for <strong>the</strong> present as <strong>the</strong> Act is new and <strong>the</strong> NaCC has to ga<strong>in</strong>experience. At <strong>the</strong> fledgl<strong>in</strong>g stage of <strong>the</strong> competition regime <strong>the</strong> extraterritorialauthority should not become priority. In this respect, collaborationwith o<strong>the</strong>r competition authorities, <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>the</strong> South African <strong>Competition</strong>Authority can play an important role <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capacity of <strong>the</strong><strong>Competition</strong> Commission and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quality of regulatory oversight.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> effects doctr<strong>in</strong>e, domestic competition laws are applicableto foreign firms - but also to domestic firms located outside <strong>the</strong> state’s territory,when <strong>the</strong>ir behaviour or transactions produce an “effect” with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> domesticterritory. The “nationality” of firms is irrelevant for <strong>the</strong> purposes of antitrustenforcement and <strong>the</strong> effects doctr<strong>in</strong>e covers all firms irrespective of <strong>the</strong>irnationality. The “effects doctr<strong>in</strong>e” was embraced by <strong>the</strong> Court of First Instance(EU) <strong>in</strong> Gencor case when stat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>the</strong> Merger Regulationto a merger between companies located outside EU territory “is justified underpublic <strong>in</strong>ternational law when it is foreseeable that a proposed concentrationwill have an immediate and substantial effect <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Community”. 68With <strong>the</strong> physical borders<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly tumbl<strong>in</strong>g down due toglobalisation and <strong>in</strong>ternational<strong>in</strong>tegration, bus<strong>in</strong>ess transactionsare no longer bound with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>territory of a certa<strong>in</strong> country.Numerous global and regional dealsare be<strong>in</strong>g concluded everywhere. Inthis context, not only <strong>the</strong> foreigncounterparts can count on <strong>the</strong>irnational or regional (for <strong>in</strong>stance,<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of EU) competitionauthorities, but also <strong>Namibia</strong>nenterprises will not be left withoutshelter <strong>in</strong> any antitrust case, if <strong>the</strong>deal or transaction is concludedIn global competition cases,which have seriousconsequences on trade,economies, and consumersall over <strong>the</strong> globe (such asthose of <strong>in</strong>ternationalcartels, or cross-borderM&As etc), <strong>Namibia</strong> as acountry and <strong>Namibia</strong>nconsumers will be able toassert <strong>the</strong>ir legitimate rightsand <strong>in</strong>terests and redeemany damage done on <strong>the</strong>m.outside <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>Namibia</strong>, or if <strong>the</strong>ir counterpart does not have a physicalpresence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. Moreover, <strong>in</strong> global competition cases, which haveserious consequences on trade, economies, and consumers all over <strong>the</strong> globe(such as those of <strong>in</strong>ternational cartels, or cross-border M&As etc), <strong>Namibia</strong>as a country and <strong>Namibia</strong>n consumers will be able to assert <strong>the</strong>ir legitimaterights and <strong>in</strong>terests and redeem any damage done on <strong>the</strong>m.84 <strong>Enforc<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Competition</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Namibia</strong>: A <strong>Toolkit</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!