APPENDIX BSummary of Peer Exchange on Data forPerformance MeasuresMadison, Wisconsin, August 25–<strong>26</strong>, 2000Members of TRB Committee A1D09, Statewide<strong>Transportation</strong> Data and Information Systems, conveneda peer exchange meeting on August 25 and <strong>26</strong>,2000, in Madison, Wisconsin (see sidebar, page 200).The theme of the peer exchange was performancemeasures in transportation and in particular the dataand data systems that underlie performance measuresin a multimodal system planning and managementcontext. Members representing nine state transportationdepartments described how their agencies developedand used performance measures and howthese efforts have shaped data collection, processing,and analysis activities.• Ronald Tweedie, chairman of the Committee ofStatewide <strong>Transportation</strong> Data and Information Systems(A1D09), opened the peer exchange with referencesto the origins of the meeting. Other TRBcommittees have availed themselves of the opportunityto meet in conjunction with their summermeetings to promote additional dialogue, coordinaterelated activities, and share a wide variety ofinformation on topics of interest to members. By nature,the peer exchange format emphasizes open sharingof practical information: for example, how newideas are being tried and tested, what is motivatingstates and others to try new methods, what is working,and what problems have developed. The August2000 meeting was the first one specifically involvingA1D09. Its focus on performance measurement systemswas in part intended to provide useful informationin advance of several relevant upcoming conferencesand workshops. Those events included theNorth American Travel Monitoring Exhibition and<strong>Conference</strong> (NATMEC), TRB <strong>Conference</strong> on PerformanceMeasures to Improve <strong>Transportation</strong> Systemsand Agency Operations, and the <strong>Conference</strong> on RemoteSensing and Spatial Information Technologiesfor <strong>Transportation</strong>. 1• This written summary of the peer exchange wasproposed as a way of extending the discussion to others.The following section provides a synthesis of recurrentissues and themes that emerged during themeeting. This synthesis is followed by a descriptionof each of the states’ presentations, including relateddiscussion. Peer exchange participants also wished togenerate a list of issues and challenges to help guidea research agenda for short- and long-term dataorientedprojects. A summary of the list appears asan appendix to these proceedings.SECTION 1: SUMMARY OF ISSUESPresentations included discussions of several importanttopics related to the use of performance measures,including data requirements and difficulties associatedwith data collection and analysis, public andpolitical acceptance of performance data, and theoverall agency strategy for using performance data.The following major issues surfaced during the weekendworkshop.1The NATMAC meeting took place August 27–31 in the Madison,Wisconsin area. The TRB <strong>Conference</strong> on Performance Measureswas held October 29–November 1, 2000, in Irvine, California.The Remote Sensing <strong>Conference</strong> took place December4–5, 2000, in Washington, D.C.198
SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES 199PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FOR PERFORMANCE MEASURESCOMMITTEE ON STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION DATA AND INFORMATION SYSTEMSMADISON, WISCONSIN, AUGUST 25–<strong>26</strong>, 2000: PARTICIPANTSNiels Robert Bostrom, Division of MultimodalPrograms, Kentucky <strong>Transportation</strong> Cabinet,125 Holmes Street, Frankfort, KY 40622Ed Christopher, Bureau of <strong>Transportation</strong> Statistics,400 7th Street SW, Room 3420, Washington,DC 20590Tremain Downey, Chief, Office of PerformanceMeasures and Data Analysis, <strong>Transportation</strong>System Information Program, MS-38, CaliforniaDepartment of <strong>Transportation</strong>, 1120 NStreet, P.O. Box 942874, Sacramento, CA94274-0001Tony Esteve, Federal Highway Administration,400 7th Street SW, DOT Building, Room3306, Washington, DC 20590Barbara Mason Haines, Manager, <strong>Transportation</strong>Planning Division, Bureau of Planning and<strong>Research</strong>, Pennsylvania DOT, P.O. Box 3555,Harrisburg, PA 17105-3555Kim Hajek, Director, Data Management, <strong>Transportation</strong>Planning and Programming Division,Texas Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>, P.O. Box149217, Austin, TX 78714-9217James P. Hall, Assistant Professor, Department ofManagement, Information Systems, Universityof Illinois, P.O. Box 19243, Springfield, IL62794Jonette Kreideweis, Director, Office of ManagementData Services, Minnesota Department of<strong>Transportation</strong>, Mail Stop 450, 395 JohnIreland Boulevard, St. Paul, MN 55155Mark C. Larson, Director, Measurement andEvaluation Section, Office of Business Planning,Minnesota Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>,Mail Stop 450, 395 John Ireland Boulevard,St. Paul, MN 55155Thomas M. Palmerlee, Senior Program Officer,<strong>Transportation</strong> Data, <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Research</strong><strong>Board</strong>, 2101 Constitution Avenue NW, RoomGR-3<strong>26</strong>C, Washington, DC 20418Roger Petzold, HEPS-20, Room 3301, FederalHighway Administration, 400 7th Street, SW,Washington, DC 20590Steve Pickrell, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 1300Clay, Suite 1010, Oakland, CA 94612Ronald W. Tweedie, 3 Carriage Road, Delmar,NY 12054Anita Vandervalk, Manager, <strong>Transportation</strong> StatisticsOffice, Planning Division, Florida Departmentof <strong>Transportation</strong>, 605 SuwanneeStreet, MS 27, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450William Walsek, Chief, Highway InformationServices Division, Maryland State HighwayAdministration, 707 N. Calvert Street, MS C-607, Baltimore, MD 21202Data Quality and IntegrityData quality is a significant concern of every agencythat participated in the exchange. There are severalaspects to data quality: currency (or timeliness), consistency(whether two sources agree) between differentpublished data sources, precision (level of detailor ‘‘grain’’), and accuracy (whether data are corrector not). Expectations of public access to high-qualitytransportation data have grown as more data havebeen made accessible over the Internet. Such expectationsinclude demand for accurate, real-time databy those interested in assessing current traffic conditionsand for comprehensive traffic counts andlong-term forecasts, often for project or development-relatedanalysis. Agencies need to anticipateand budget for public access to avoid public relationsproblems.Specific concerns expressed by meeting participantsinclude the following:• As mentioned, data accuracy is a significant concern.Agency staff acknowledge that they may sometimeshave to make available data that they knoware imperfect. A good Department of <strong>Transportation</strong>(DOT) staff continually corrects or improves theirdata sets. One way to achieve better data accuracy isto expose it to the light of day. As more data aremade available and put to use, there will be morepublic pressure and hence management support fordata quality, timeliness, and accuracy.
- Page 5 and 6:
National Academy of SciencesNationa
- Page 7 and 8:
Workshop Summary ..................
- Page 9:
General OverviewIntroductionExecuti
- Page 12 and 13:
4 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE T
- Page 14 and 15:
6 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE T
- Page 18 and 19:
10 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 20 and 21:
12 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 23:
Linking Performance Measures withDe
- Page 26 and 27:
18 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 28 and 29:
20 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 30 and 31:
22 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 32 and 33:
24 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 34 and 35:
26 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 36 and 37:
28 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 38 and 39:
30 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 40 and 41:
32 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 42 and 43:
Panel DiscussionJohn Poorman, Capit
- Page 44 and 45:
36 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 46 and 47:
38 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 48 and 49:
Workshop SummaryJohn Basilica, Loui
- Page 50 and 51:
42 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 52 and 53:
44 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 55 and 56:
RESOURCE PAPERImplementing Performa
- Page 57 and 58:
IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMEN
- Page 59 and 60:
IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMEN
- Page 61 and 62:
IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMEN
- Page 63 and 64:
IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMEN
- Page 65 and 66:
IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMEN
- Page 67 and 68:
Panel DiscussionJennifer Finch, Col
- Page 69 and 70:
FIGURE 2Level of measures and align
- Page 71 and 72:
PANEL DISCUSSION: AGENCY IMPLEMENTA
- Page 73 and 74:
PANEL DISCUSSION: AGENCY IMPLEMENTA
- Page 75 and 76:
PANEL DISCUSSION: AGENCY IMPLEMENTA
- Page 77 and 78:
PANEL DISCUSSION: AGENCY IMPLEMENTA
- Page 79 and 80:
WORKSHOP SUMMARY: AGENCY IMPLEMENTA
- Page 81:
Selecting Measures, Data Needs, and
- Page 84 and 85:
76 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 86 and 87:
78 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 88 and 89:
80 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 90 and 91:
82 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 92 and 93:
84 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 94 and 95:
86 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 96 and 97:
Panel Discussion, Part 1Anita Vande
- Page 98 and 99:
90 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 100 and 101:
92 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 102 and 103:
Panel Discussion, Part 2Douglas Zim
- Page 104 and 105:
FIGURE 11 Example data
- Page 106 and 107:
98 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 108 and 109:
Workshop SummaryBrenda Berg, Trans
- Page 110 and 111:
102 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 113 and 114:
RESOURCE PAPERMeasuring That Which
- Page 115 and 116:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 117 and 118:
TABLE 1Sustainability MeasuresNewma
- Page 119 and 120:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 121 and 122:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 123 and 124:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 125 and 126:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 127 and 128:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 129 and 130:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 131 and 132:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 133 and 134:
MEASURING THAT WHICH CANNOT BE MEAS
- Page 135 and 136:
PANEL DISCUSSION: CONNECTING SYSTEM
- Page 137 and 138:
PANEL DISCUSSION: CONNECTING SYSTEM
- Page 139 and 140:
PANEL DISCUSSION: CONNECTING SYSTEM
- Page 141 and 142:
PANEL DISCUSSION: CONNECTING SYSTEM
- Page 143 and 144:
Workshop SummaryScott Bassett, Oreg
- Page 145:
Freight Performance MeasuresCurrent
- Page 148 and 149:
140 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 150 and 151:
142 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 152 and 153:
144 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 154 and 155:
146 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 156 and 157: 148 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 158 and 159: 150 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 160 and 161: 152 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO IMPROVE
- Page 163 and 164: APPENDIX ASummaries of 20 Poster Se
- Page 165 and 166: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 157
- Page 167 and 168: TABLE 1(continued) WSDOT Outcomes,
- Page 169 and 170: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 161
- Page 171 and 172: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 163
- Page 173 and 174: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 165
- Page 175 and 176: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 167
- Page 177 and 178: FIGURE 2 Sacramento Regional Transi
- Page 179 and 180: FIGURE 3Goal evaluation table: Chit
- Page 181 and 182: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 173
- Page 183 and 184: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 175
- Page 185 and 186: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 177
- Page 187 and 188: TABLE 6Mobility Performance Measure
- Page 189 and 190: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 181
- Page 191 and 192: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 183
- Page 193 and 194: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 185
- Page 195 and 196: FIGURE 13 MPAH lane-miles by roadwa
- Page 197 and 198: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 189
- Page 199 and 200: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 191
- Page 201 and 202: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 193
- Page 203 and 204: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 195
- Page 205: SUMMARIES OF 20 POSTER SESSIONS 197
- Page 209 and 210: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 211 and 212: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 213 and 214: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 215 and 216: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 217 and 218: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 219 and 220: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 221 and 222: SUMMARY OF PEER EXCHANGE ON DATA FO
- Page 223 and 224: APPENDIX C: RESEARCH STATEMENTS DEV
- Page 225 and 226: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 217University,
- Page 227: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 219Darwin Stua