12.07.2015 Views

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 CONDITIONAL HETEROSCEDASTIC MODELSisr t = 0.0222 + a t , σ 2t = 0.0121 + 0.3029a 2 t−1 , (3.11)where the standard errors <strong>of</strong> the parameters are 0.0019, 0.1443, and 0.0061, respectively.All the estimates are significant at the 5% level, but the t ratio <strong>of</strong> ˆα 1 is only2.10. The unconditional variance <strong>of</strong> a t is 0.0121/(1 − 0.3029) = 0.0174, which isclose to that obtained under normality. The Ljung–Box statistics <strong>of</strong> the standardizedshocks give Q(10) = 13.66 with p-value 0.19, confirming that the mean equationis adequate. However, the Ljung–Box statistics for the squared standardized shocksshow Q(10) = 23.83 with p value 0.008. The volatility equation is inadequate at the5% level. We refine the model by considering an ARCH(2) model and obtainr t = 0.0225 + a t . σ 2t = 0.0113 + 0.226a 2 t−1 + 0.108a2 t−2 , (3.12)where the standard errors <strong>of</strong> the parameters are 0.006, 0.002, 0.135, and 0.094,respectively. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> at−1 2 is marginally significant at the 10% level, butthat <strong>of</strong> at−2 2 is only slightly greater than its standard error. The Ljung–Box statisticsfor the squared standardized shocks give Q(10) = 8.82 with p value 0.55. Consequently,the fitted ARCH(2) model appears to be adequate.Comparing models (3.10), (3.11), and (3.12), we see that (a) using a heavy-taileddistribution for ɛ t reduces the ARCH effect, and (b) the difference among the threemodels is small for this particular instance. Finally, a more appropriate conditionalheteroscedastic model for this data set is a GARCH(1, 1) model, which is discussedin the next section.Example 3.2. Consider the percentage changes <strong>of</strong> the exchange rate betweenMark and Dollar in 10-minute intervals. The data are shown in Figure 3.2(a). Asshown in Figure 3.3(a), the series has no serial correlations. However, the samplePACF <strong>of</strong> the squared series at 2 shows some big spikes, especially at lags 1 and 3.There are some large PACF at higher lags, but the lower order lags tend to be moreimportant. Following the procedure discussed in the previous subsection, we specifyan ARCH(3) model for the series. Using the conditional Gaussian likelihood function,we obtain the fitted modelσ 2t = 0.22 × 10 −6 + 0.328a 2 t−1 + 0.073a2 t−2 + 0.103a2 t−3 ,where all the estimates are statistically significant at the 5% significant level, andthe standard errors <strong>of</strong> the parameters are 0.46 × 10 −8 , 0.0162, 0.0160, and 0.0147,respectively. Model checking, using the standardized shock ã t , indicates that themodel is adequate.Remark: The estimation <strong>of</strong> conditional heteroscedastic models <strong>of</strong> this chapteris carried out by the Regression <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Time</strong> <strong>Series</strong> (RATS) package. There are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!