12.07.2015 Views

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VECTOR VOLATILITY MODELS 379large-cap companies tend to be affected by the past behavior <strong>of</strong> the market. However,the market return is not significantly affected by the past returns <strong>of</strong> individualcompanies.Turning to volatility modeling and following the suggested procedure, we startwith the log return <strong>of</strong> S&P 500 index and obtain the modelr 1t = 0.078 + 0.042r 1,t−1 − 0.062r 1,t−3 − 0.048r 1,t−4 − 0.052r 1,t−5 + a 1tσ 11,t = 0.013 + 0.092a 2 1,t−1 + 0.894σ 11,t−1, (9.29)where standard errors <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the mean equation are 0.016, 0.023,0.020, 0.022, and 0.020, respectively, and those <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the volatilityequation are 0.002, 0.006, and 0.007, respectively. Univariate Ljung–Box statistics<strong>of</strong> the standardized residuals and their squared series fail to detect any remainingserial correlation or conditional heteroscedasticity in the data. <strong>In</strong>deed, we haveQ(10) = 7.38(0.69) for the standardized residuals and Q(10) = 3.14(0.98) for thesquared series.Augmenting the daily log returns <strong>of</strong> Cisco stock to the system, we build a bivariatemodel with mean equations given byr 1t = 0.065 − 0.046r 1,t−3 + a 1tr 2t = 0.325 + 0.195r 1,t−2 − 0.091r 2,t−2 + a 2t , (9.30)where all <strong>of</strong> the estimates are statistically significant at the 1% level. Using the notation<strong>of</strong> Cholesky decomposition, we obtain the volatility equations asg 11,t = 0.006 + 0.051b 2 1,t−1 + 0.943g 11,t−1q 21,t = 0.331 + 0.790q 21,t−1 − 0.041a 2,t−1 (9.31)g 22,t = 0.177 + 0.082b2,t−1 2 + 0.890g 22,t−1,where b 1t = a 1t , b 2t = a 2t − q 21,t b 1t , standard errors <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the equation<strong>of</strong> g 11,t are 0.001, 0.005, and 0.006, those <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the equation <strong>of</strong>q 21,t are 0.156, 0.099, and 0.011, and those <strong>of</strong> the parameters in the equation <strong>of</strong> g 22,tare 0.029, 0.008, and 0.011, respectively. The bivariate Ljung–Box statistics <strong>of</strong> thestandardized residuals fail to detect any remaining serial dependence or conditionalheteroscedasticity. The bivariate model is adequate. Comparing with Eq. (9.29), wesee that the difference between the marginal and univariate models <strong>of</strong> r 1t is small.The next and final step is to augment the daily log returns <strong>of</strong> <strong>In</strong>tel stock to thesystem. The mean equations becomer 1t = 0.065 − 0.043r 1,t−3 + a 1tr 2t = 0.326 + 0.201r 1,t−2 − 0.089r 2,t−2 + a 2t (9.32)r 3t = 0.192 − 0.264r 1,t−1 + 0.059r 3,t−1 + a 3t ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!