12.07.2015 Views

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SIMPLE AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS 37Table 2.1. Sample Partial Autocorrelation Function and Akaike <strong>In</strong>formation Criterionfor the Monthly Simple Returns <strong>of</strong> CRSP Value-Weighted <strong>In</strong>dex from January 1926 toDecember 1997.p 1 2 3 4 5PACF 0.11 -0.02 −0.12 0.04 0.07AIC −5.807 −5.805 −5.817 −5.816 −5.819p 6 7 8 9 10PACF −0.06 0.02 0.06 0.06 −0.01AIC −5.821 −5.819 −5.820 −5.821 −5.818As an example, consider the monthly simple returns <strong>of</strong> CRSP value-weightedindex from January 1926 to December 1997. Table 2.1 gives the first 10 lags <strong>of</strong>sample PACF <strong>of</strong> the series. With T = 864, the asymptotic standard error <strong>of</strong> thesample PACF is approximately 0.03. Therefore, using the 5% significant level, weidentify an AR(3) or AR(5) model for the data (i.e., p = 3or5).<strong>In</strong>formation CriteriaThere are several information criteria available to determine the order p <strong>of</strong> an ARprocess. All <strong>of</strong> them are likelihood based. For example, the well-known Akaike <strong>In</strong>formationCriterion (Akaike, 1973) is defined asAIC = −2T ln(likelihood) + 2 T× (number <strong>of</strong> parameters), (2.13)where the likelihood function is evaluated at the maximum likelihood estimates andT is the sample size. For a Gaussian AR(l) model, AIC reduces toAIC(l) = ln( ˆσ 2 l ) + 2lT ,where ˆσ 2 l is the maximum likelihood estimate <strong>of</strong> σ 2 a , which is the variance <strong>of</strong> a t,and T is the sample size; see Eq. (1.18). <strong>In</strong> practice, one computes AIC(l) forl = 0,...,P, whereP is a prespecified positive integer and selects the order kthat has the minimum AIC value. The second term <strong>of</strong> the AIC in Eq. (2.13) is calledthe penalty function <strong>of</strong> the criterion because it penalizes a candidate model by thenumber <strong>of</strong> parameters used. Different penalty functions result in different informationcriteria.Table 2.1 also gives the AIC for p = 1,...,10. The AIC values are close to eachother with minimum −5.821 occurring at p = 6 and 9, suggesting that an AR(6)model is preferred by the criterion. This example shows that different approachesfor order determination may result in different choices <strong>of</strong> p. There is no evidence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!