12.07.2015 Views

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

"Frontmatter". In: Analysis of Financial Time Series

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTOR-VOLATILITY MODELS 383considered there allows for time-varying correlations, but in a relatively restrictivemanner. Additional references <strong>of</strong> multivariate volatility model include Harvey, Ruiz,and Shephard (1995). We discuss MCMC methods to volatility modeling in Chapter10.9.4 FACTOR-VOLATILITY MODELSAnother approach to simplifying the dynamic structure <strong>of</strong> a multivariate volatilityprocess is to use factor models. <strong>In</strong> practice, the “common factors” can be determineda priori by substantive matter or empirical methods. As an illustration, we use thefactor analysis <strong>of</strong> Chapter 8 to discuss factor-volatility models. Because volatilitymodels are concerned with the evolution over time <strong>of</strong> the conditional covariancematrix <strong>of</strong> a t ,wherea t = r t − µ t , a simple way to identify the “common factors” involatility is to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on a t ; see the PCA <strong>of</strong>Chapter 8. Building a factor volatility model thus involves a three-step procedure:• select the first few principal components that explain a high percentage <strong>of</strong> variabilityin a t ,• build a volatility model for the selected principal components, and• relate the volatility <strong>of</strong> each a it series to the volatilities <strong>of</strong> the selected principalcomponents.The objective <strong>of</strong> such a procedure is to reduce the dimension, but maintain an accurateapproximation <strong>of</strong> the multivariate volatility.Example 9.4. Consider again the monthly log returns, in percentages, <strong>of</strong>IBM stock and the S&P 500 index <strong>of</strong> Example 9.2. Using the bivariate AR(3) model<strong>of</strong> Example 8.4, we obtain an innovational series a t . Performing a PCA on a t basedon its covariance matrix, we obtained eigenvalues 63.373 and 13.489. The first eigenvalueexplains 82.2% <strong>of</strong> the generalized variance <strong>of</strong> a t . Therefore, we may choosethe first principal component x t = 0.797a 1t + 0.604a 2t as the common factor. Alternatively,as shown by the model in Example 8.4, the serial dependence in r t is weakand hence, one can perform the PCA on r t directly. For this particular instance, thetwo eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> the sample covariance matrix <strong>of</strong> r t are 63.625 and 13.513, whichare essentially the same as those based on a t .Thefirst principal component explainsapproximately 82.5% <strong>of</strong> the generalized variance <strong>of</strong> r t , and the corresponding commonfactor is x t = 0.796r 1t + 0.605r 2t . Consequently, for the two monthly logreturn series considered, the effect <strong>of</strong> the conditional mean equations on PCA is negligible.Based on the prior discussion and for simplicity, we use x t = 0.796r 1t + 0.605r 2tas a common factor for the two monthly return series. Figure 9.11(a) shows the timeplot <strong>of</strong> this common factor. If univariate Gaussian GARCH models are entertained,we obtain the following model for x t :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!