Jenner Radar Site B-76 Archives Search Report ... - Corpsfuds.org

historical records would include common practice in production,
storage, usage, or disposal, at that time, which could have
allowed present day ordnance contamination. Potential ordnance
contamination could also be based on indirect witness or from
present day site features. Additional field data is needed to
confirm potential ordnance site.
(3) Uncontaminated ordnance subsites are based on a
lack of confirmed or potential ordnance evidence. Historical
records evidence and present day site inspections do not indicate
confirmed or potential ordnance contamination.
b. Area A: Cantonment Area
(1) This area has been subjected to a great deal of
excavation, in the form of vegetation removal, home construction,
remodeling and road construction. There have been no reports of
OE contamination as a result of this excavation.
(2) There have been no reports of OE or OE debris being
found in Area A since site closure. Additionally, there were no
records found during the records search that would indicate past
.&I or present OE contamination with in Area A.
J
(3) There was no evidence of OE contamination, burial
sites or disposal pits found during the SI Team's site
inspection.
(4) Due to the lack of physical evidence and the lack of
a reported OE presence, Area "A" is considered to be
uncontaminated.
c. Area B: Radar Annex
(1) This area also has been subjected to a great deal of
excavation, in the form of building and vegetation removal and
home construction. There have been no reports of OE
contamination as a result of these excavations.
(2) There have been no reports of OE or OE debris being
found in Area B since site closure. Additionally, there were no
records found during the records search that would indicate past
or present OE contamination with in Area B.