12.07.2015 Views

Decision Making in a Changing Climate - World Resources Institute

Decision Making in a Changing Climate - World Resources Institute

Decision Making in a Changing Climate - World Resources Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characteristics ofEffective <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>in</strong> a Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Climate</strong>Research conducted for <strong>World</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> 2010–2011 suggests that theunique challenges presented by climate change will require decisionmak<strong>in</strong>gapproaches that display certa<strong>in</strong> characteristics tailored to thetypes of changes, uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, and vulnerabilities described here. Inthe short sections that follow, we explore the need for adaptation decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g to be responsive, proactive, flexible, durable, or robust,depend<strong>in</strong>g on the type of change at hand. <strong>Decision</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g that exhibitsthese qualities is more likely to be able to assess climate risks adequately,formulate plans that can accommodate uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, and stand the testsof time and public acceptability. These five characteristics of the types ofdecision mak<strong>in</strong>g needed <strong>in</strong> a chang<strong>in</strong>g climate are by no means exhaustive,however. A broader suite of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of good governance will alsobe essential if adaptation decision mak<strong>in</strong>g is to be effective and targetthe most vulnerable. 58Five Characteristicsof Effective <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>The Need for Responsive <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>Figure 2.5 Five Attributes of Effective <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>for a Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Climate</strong>ResponsiveProactiveFlexibleDurableRobustclim ate ch a ngeTImepolicy/pl a n33Change, VulnerabilityandChapter<strong>Decision</strong>title<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>ResponsiveA responsive decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process would advance policies/pl a ns after a clim atech a nge has occurred, to react quickly to the clim ate ch a nge.In deal<strong>in</strong>g with the aftermath of extreme events, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes will need to reactquickly to <strong>in</strong>formation about the impacts on people and ecosystems caused by the event. Ideally, overtime, governments can move from responsive to proactive decision mak<strong>in</strong>g—from disaster relief todisaster risk reduction and preparedness. Bangladesh, one of the world’s most natural disaster-pronecountries (see p. 100), provides a good example of such a progression <strong>in</strong> national policy.The Need for Proactive <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>ProactiveA proactive decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process will create policies/pl a ns <strong>in</strong> advance of a clim atech a nge that has yet to occur; the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process prepares for that clim atech a nge and its impacts.Because of the cumulative nature of climate change and its long time horizon, the need to anticipateand act on climate risks early is especially press<strong>in</strong>g. Seem<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>cremental climate changestoday that are not abated <strong>in</strong> the near term could manifest themselves decades from now as potentiallyirreversible changes. Examples could <strong>in</strong>clude the loss of glacial ice sheets, unique cultures,and species diversity, or the collapse of certa<strong>in</strong> biological, physical and hydrological systems. 60Thus, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes must be proactive—anticipat<strong>in</strong>g extremes, variability, andlong-term change and their consequences—if development and environmental goals are to be met.For example, a planner may choose not to locate new hydroelectric dams <strong>in</strong> an area that modelsshow may be subject to drought <strong>in</strong> a decade.WRR expert paperSaleemul Huq: “Floods, droughts andhurricanes are well known phenomenawhich affect many parts of the world.However, prepar<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>in</strong>creasedfrequency and/or <strong>in</strong>creased magnitudeof events is someth<strong>in</strong>g we have only juststarted to th<strong>in</strong>k about (both at the globalas well as national level). . . . The paradigmshift that is needed is to move away fromthe current reactive mode to a more proactivemode, or from disaster management(post disaster) to disaster preparedness (ordisaster risk reduction).”— Saleemul Huq, International <strong>Institute</strong>for Environment and Developmentdecision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a chang<strong>in</strong>g climate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!