12.07.2015 Views

Hygiene Promotion - IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre

Hygiene Promotion - IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre

Hygiene Promotion - IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

process. Check TOP Contacts for contacts near you, or consult the Streams of KnowledgeCoalition (SoK) for help in tracking one down.Financial resources extend beyond the costs of salaries, training <strong>and</strong> transport. Alsoimportant is some seed money for pooling with local resources to finance smallcommunity-designed projects. In contrast, costs of educational materials are low.Community groups <strong>and</strong> workers rely on group work <strong>and</strong> home visits. Any material used forparticipatory activities (such as for PRA sessions <strong>and</strong> self-surveys) is locally available <strong>and</strong>has low or no costs. Other important items are resources for programme management <strong>and</strong>support (backstopping) to communities <strong>and</strong> for building up a programme knowledge baseto summarise the situations <strong>and</strong> achievements in individual communities over time.Financial support for hygiene promotion is sometimes difficult to get. The problem is not somuch the amount of money needed as the extended timescale <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>and</strong> impactsobtained with the funds. Demonstration of what is being achieved with the funds can helpmake hygiene promotion more attractive.Outputs: measuring behaviour changeAlthough water <strong>and</strong> sanitation professionals are generally sensitive to the need forpatience in assessing the benefits of hygiene promotion, their agency rules maysometimes dem<strong>and</strong> early results from impact analyses. However, it makes no sense to try<strong>and</strong> measure impacts. Even if reliable health statistics are available, impacts will only beginto show up after a critical mass of behaviour change has been achieved. Esrey, citedabove, showed that 75% adoption of key hygiene conditions <strong>and</strong> practices has worked assuch a critical mass for diarrhoeal diseases. Work is therefore done on monitoringtechniques that measure impacts on hygiene behaviour prior to attempts to detect impactson health. The book Actions Speak documents initial work done in this area.http://www.irc.nl/page/1836Before impacts can be assessed at all, information on outputs is needed. Outputs are anumber of operationally described improved conditions <strong>and</strong>/or practices as defined fromthe identification of risky conditions <strong>and</strong> practices. (Some also call these effects).There are a number of methods to measure effects in conditions <strong>and</strong> behaviour(behavioural change). The methods are often used in combination to test for consistency tosee whether outcomes are reliable. The most common ones are:• Structured observation of hygiene conditions <strong>and</strong> practices, e.g. observing whetherfacilities for the behaviour are in place <strong>and</strong> observing <strong>and</strong> recording behaviour e.g.during water collection, storage <strong>and</strong> drawing;• Structured observation of proxies of hygiene behaviour, e.g. the absence of excreta inyards <strong>and</strong> on rubbish heaps as an indication of the safe disposal of young children’sexcreta, or well-trodden paths <strong>and</strong> excreta in pits as indicators of latrine use;• Questioning of the ones who are most likely to know, which requires techniques todeal with interventions from others with less knowledge, who may nevertheless take30 <strong>Hygiene</strong> promotion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!