12.07.2015 Views

STAINLESS STEEL IN FIRE (SSIF) - Steel-stainless.org

STAINLESS STEEL IN FIRE (SSIF) - Steel-stainless.org

STAINLESS STEEL IN FIRE (SSIF) - Steel-stainless.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tis the time (s)β = 12.25α = λ a/ρ aC a(λ a=45 W/mK, C a= 600 J/KgK, ρ a= 7850 Kg/m 3 )θ lw= is the mean temperatures at the bottom edge of the web = κ 3 θ pin which θ pis thetemperature of the <strong>stainless</strong> steel plate and κ 3 is a reduction factor given in Table 4.6.Table 4.5Values of parameter θ o , a and bPart i of thebeamStainless steelplateLower flangeLower part of thewebUpper part of thewebArea A i Temperature θ I 1) Characteristic strengthf y,θiFull areaA p =e p ×b pFull areaA lf =e f ×b fUniform temperature distributionFor IF-beam: θ p = θ o - κ 1 ×e pFor SF-beam: θ p = θ o - κ 1 ×(e p +e f )Uniform temperature distributionθ lf = κ 2 ×θ pk 2,θp× f sy,20 °k y,θlf× f ay,20°CA wl = e w × h lChanges linearly from θ lw to 20°C f ay,20°C × (1+ k y,θlw )/2A ul = e w × (h w -h l ) Lower than 400°C f ya,20°CFull areaUpper flangeLower than 400°CA uf =e f ×b f1) θ o , κ 1 and κ 2 are empirical coefficients depending on the fire rating onlyf ya,20°CTable 4.6 Values of parameter θ o , κ 1 , κ 2 and κ 3Fireratingθ o κ 1 κ 3IF beam SF-beam IF beam SF beamκ 2IF beam SF beam30 570 500 7 3 0.75 - -60 830 775 6 3 0.85 0.77 0.7690 920 930 3 3 0.90 0.83 0.81120 980 1025 2 3 0.95 0.87 0.84The results obtained with the proposed design method were compared to the results predicted bynumerical analysis. For the numerical predictions, the beam was firstly subjected to the EN 1363-1standard fire curve for 60, 90 and 120 minutes under the effects of neighbouring vertical loads. Then thetemperature distribution was kept constant and a vertical load P was applied, which increased graduallyuntil the beams failed. The failure point of the beam was taken when the maximum mechanical strainin the <strong>stainless</strong> steel plate exceeded 2%, corresponding to a maximum deflection of L/15 to L/10. Ingeneral good agreement was achieved with the proposed design method and the numerical modeldiffering by no more than 10%. For a load ratio smaller than 0.7, a fire rating of R60 (i.e. 60 minutes)is easily achievable. An integrated beam can achieve R90 and a slim floor beam can achieve R120when the load ratio is lower than 0.5 without any applied fire protection.37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!