01.12.2012 Views

EIB Papers Volume 13. n°1/2008 - European Investment Bank

EIB Papers Volume 13. n°1/2008 - European Investment Bank

EIB Papers Volume 13. n°1/2008 - European Investment Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 <strong>Volume</strong>13 N°1 <strong>2008</strong> <strong>EIB</strong> PAPERS<br />

Box 3. Government investment in “Economic Affairs” in the EU, Japan and the<br />

United States<br />

The classification of government expenditure by functions (COFOG) in the <strong>European</strong> System<br />

of Accounts (1995) discussed in Section 2 is based on the United Nations’ System of National<br />

Accounts (1993); consequently, a similar breakdown as presented for <strong>European</strong> countries is<br />

also used in countries outside Europe. That allows us to compare the level and evolution of<br />

government investment in “Economic Affairs” (infrastructure for short) in Europe with Japan<br />

and the United States.<br />

The Figure B2 shows that the current level of government infrastructure investment is lowest<br />

in EU-15 at about 0.8 percent of GDP, a third of the level in Japan. In the United States the<br />

government sector invests some 1 percent of GDP in infrastructure, while in the new member<br />

states of the EU the figure is 1.5 percent of GDP.<br />

As mentioned in the main text, some of the cross-country differences reflect simply different<br />

institutional set-ups for providing infrastructure services. In addition, it is important not to<br />

confuse quantity with quality: These figures tell us something about the relative size of annual<br />

investment flows from public sources, but how productive that investment is is an altogether<br />

different matter.<br />

Further on Figure B2, we see that government infrastructure investment has remained<br />

remarkably stable over the past decade or so in EU-15 and the United States, while there has<br />

been a marked downtrend in Japan, related to the winding down of the drawn-out fiscal<br />

stimulus of the 1990s. In the NMS, government infrastructure investment was on a downtrend<br />

until a few years ago, halving in magnitude relative to GDP. However, the past few years have<br />

seen a reversal of that downtrend.<br />

Figure B2. Government investment in “Economic Affairs”<br />

(in percent of GDP; GDP-weighted average for EU-15 and NMS)<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

US<br />

Source: Eurostat, OECD, own calculations<br />

EU-15 NMS Japan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!