Final Program - Society for College and University Planning

Tuesday, July 21, 20097:00 am–8:15 am Idea MarketplaceContinental BreakfastConcurrent Sessions8:30 am–10:00 am A105A Campus Heritage Plan for a Reinvented CampusLucy Cossentino-Sinnard, Senior Environmental & Graphic Designer, University ofCincinnati; Mary Beth McGrew, Associate VP of Planning + Design + Construction,University of Cincinnati; Charles Raith, Associate Director - Architecture andHistoric Preservation, John Milner Associates, Inc.Convener: Thomas Butcavage, Vice-President, SmithGroupDevelopment of the Campus Heritage Plan at the University of Cincinnaticame on the heels of construction projects that transformed 48 percentof the campus. The ambitious makeover put the campus on the mapthrough the avant-garde of the design field. A plan to address preservationor change in the buildings/landscapes and processes for addressing therehabilitation, restoration, or demolition of the buildings and open spaceson campus was needed for current and future generations for thoughtfuldecisions about the signature works.Learning Outcomes:1. Integrate a preservation plan as part of the campus master plan.2. Assess strategies for addressing the preservation of significant buildingsand landscapes.3. Analyze maintenance and use that begs the questions of alteration and repairor “how much latitude is conscionable in changing a building?”AIA Credits Possible: 1.5 LU HSW SDCPE Credits Possible: 1.5; Field of Study: Management Advisory Services8:30 am–10:00 am B110–B112Creating Sustainable Innovation CapacitiesRobert Brodnick, Assistant Provost for Planning, Innovation, and InstitutionalAssessment, University of the Pacific; Dean Hering, Chief Innovator, OVOConvener: Howard Wertheimer, Director, Capital Planning & Space Management,Georgia TechOne of the fundamental engines of quality higher education is creatingknowledge, yet few institutions have built capacities to innovate outsideof the bounds of traditional faculty research and scholarship. We proposethat innovation is a business process that is critical for higher educationalinstitutions to address. This session will provide lessons from a variety ofindustries that have successfully innovated.Learning Outcomes:1. Discuss ideas for building sustainable capacities to innovate on your campus.2. Discover tools that will help you build your capacity to innovate.3. Discuss innovation as a business process.AIA Credits Possible: 1.5 LUCPE Credits Possible: 1.5; Field of Study: Business Management and Organization8:30 am–10:00 am B113Do-It-Yourself Campus Planning:Effective Toolkits for Campus Facilities PlannersDavid Lehrer, Director of Partner Relations and Communications, Center for theBuilt Environment (CBE); Marijke Antonia Smit, Director, MKThinkConvener: Paul J. Tellers, Director of Planning, WTW ArchitectsWell-endowed institutions typically use professional advice and toolswhen assessing the performance and effectiveness of facilities to establisha baseline for planning. But cash-strapped institutions often do not havethat option. Recently, however, a host of online do-it-yourself tools haveenabled college planners to take matters into their own hands. But notall tools are equal. Learn how to navigate the array of self-assessmenttools, define the building blocks for a successful self-study, and leverageconsultants in a cost-effective manner.Learning Outcomes:1. Identify the available on-line measurement tools and understand their valueand usefulness.2. Create a compliment of self-assessment tools that, when used together,provide meaningful information.3. Recognize when to hire a consultant to supplement do-it-yourself tools.AIA Credits Possible: 1.5 LUCPE Credits Possible: 1.5; Field of Study: Management Advisory Services8:30 am–10:00 am A107–A109From Katrina to Cross Creek: The Renaissance of theUniversity of Southern Mississippi Gulf CoastBryan Billings, Director, Project Planning, Contracts Management & EmergencyPreparedness, University of Southern Mississippi; Greg Havens, Principal, SasakiAssociates, Inc; Pat Joachim, Associate Provost, The University of SouthernMississippi Gulf CoastConvener: Nancy Knight, Associate Vice President, Campus and CommunityPlanning, University of British ColumbiaThe USM Gulf Park campus was nearly destroyed by Katrina on August29, 2005. Within days, USM relocated its operations to a former hospitalenabling students to complete the semester and graduate on time. Today,the Gulf Park campus has partially reopened and plans are underway forrehabilitating the historic, waterfront buildings. USM is also planning anew campus at Cross Creek, an inland site. This presentation explores thejourney of USM from the aftermath of Katrina to the emerging vision forthe future.Learning Outcomes:1. Assess disaster preparation and recovery strategies from the first-hand experiences.2. Identify planning strategies and considerations about rebuilding on a historicsite that is likely to experience future disasters.3. Explore campus site selection issues and planning in response to sustainabledesign objectives and the requirements of the American College and UniversityPresidents Climate Commitment.AIA Credits Possible: 1.5 LU HSWCPE Credits Possible: 1.5; Field of Study: Social Environment of Business8:30 am–10:00 am B117–B119Great Expectations: How Learning Outcomes MeasuresWill Impact Student ExpectationsChristine K. Cavanaugh, Director, Training and Professional Development, TheGeorge Washington University; Deborah Ford, Chancellor, University of Wisconsin,Parkside; Kathleen Howley, Asst. Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs,Pennsylvania State System of Higher EducationConvener: Ned Collier, Principal, Perry Dean Rogers | Partners ArchitectsNext-generation students have different expectations. The focus onstudent learning outcomes to determine student knowledge has set us ona path to fundamentally restructure planning in recruitment, admissions,curriculum design, supporting student services, and degree/certificatecompletion requirements. The presenters will discuss how expectationsare affected by increasing and competing accountability demands as wellas the impact on resource allocations, globalization, and the competitionfor student talent in the reshaping of indicators measuring performanceand success.Learning Outcomes:1. Predict how learning outcome measures can impact the supply side of studentexpectations and choices.2. Discuss issues on recruitment and retention of students and the impact foracademic and student affairs personnel.3. Identify strategies to provide offerings to meet future needs of nextgeneration students.AIA Credits Possible: 1.5 LUCPE Credits Possible: 1.5; Field of Study: Management Advisory Servicestuesdaywww.SCUP.ORG/ANNUALCONf/44 19