12.07.2015 Views

Integrated control of wheat blossom midge - HGCA

Integrated control of wheat blossom midge - HGCA

Integrated control of wheat blossom midge - HGCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical detail 2.Genetic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Orange Blossom Midge Resistance in WheatIntroductionAs part <strong>of</strong> the integrated project ‘The <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>control</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>wheat</strong> <strong>blossom</strong> <strong>midge</strong> ‘ the John Innes Centreundertook a series <strong>of</strong> experiments to evaluate the genetic basis <strong>of</strong> variation in the responses <strong>of</strong> different UKand foreign varieties to orange <strong>blossom</strong> <strong>midge</strong> infestation. Much <strong>of</strong> this work involved the testing <strong>of</strong> precisegenetic stocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>wheat</strong> so that any tolerance/resistance observed could be attributed to specificchromosomes or genes.Materials and Methods:MaterialsFour different groups <strong>of</strong> materials were examined:1. A series <strong>of</strong> varieties that represent key current and historic germplasm used in the UK winter <strong>wheat</strong> genepool as well as lines that are parents <strong>of</strong> precise genetic stocks or mapping populations. The varietiesevaluated are shown in Figure 1.2. A set <strong>of</strong> single chromosome substitution lines where chromosomes <strong>of</strong> a donor variety, the Russian varietyBezostaya, have systematically replaced their homologous chromosome in the recipient variety Cappelle-Desprez. These were developed at the John Innes Centre using the methods described by Law and Worland(1967). Because marker analysis had shown that certain <strong>of</strong> these were not genetically correct, not all <strong>of</strong> thepossible set <strong>of</strong> 21 possible substitution lines (1A to 7D) were evaluated, and lines 4B and 5B were absent.All available lines were grown in 2001/02, 2002/03, but only substitution lines not differing significantly inflowering time but showing significant differences from the recurrent parent were grown in 2003/04, namelylines 1D, 3A and 7B, and Bezostaya was also not represented in this trial.3. A set <strong>of</strong> isogenic lines differing for alleles at the loci <strong>control</strong>ling the photoperiod response, and hence theflowering time <strong>of</strong> <strong>wheat</strong>, in the genetic background <strong>of</strong> the winter <strong>wheat</strong> cultivars Cappelle-Desprez andMercia. These consisted <strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> Cappelle-Desprez carrying an allele at the locus Ppd1 (Ppd-D1) onchromosome 2D conferring photoperiod insensitivity from the Italian variety Mara, and an allele conferring35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!