âComputational Civil Engineering - "Intersections" International Journal

More documents

Recommendations

Info

“Computational Civil Engineering 2005”, International Symposium 207The beam-to-column connections considerate in the portal design arecorresponding as rigid by full welding, pinned by angles web cleats and as semirigidby top and seat angles or flush end plate. For demonstrative purposes, thestiffness for the semi-rigid connection is related to the beam stiffness as 4EI b /L b inwhich, I b is the beam moment of inertia and L b is the beam length.The moment diagrams for the three assumed beam connection types are presentedin Fig. 4.a., for the references model and in Fig. 4.b for the proposed program.127.5152.6 127.5152.6260.0260.052.2Kb =8Kc =887.193.6 113.8 93.6552.2Kb =8Kc =887.1113.8296.3296.331.7Kb = 4EIb/LbKc =871.531.679Kb = 4EIb/LbKc =871.530Kb = 0 Kc =296.3830296.330 30Kb = 0 Kc =a. b.8Figure 4.Bending moments in a portal (kNm).It can be seen that the bending moment for the members are very much influencedby the connection details.Practically, the beam-to column connections and the column-to-foundationsconnections have finite stiffness.An other example studied with the same program, consist in an elastic analysis of amulti-storey unbraced steel frame.The six storey frame with rigid joints has been proposed by Vogel (1985) ascalibration example for checking the accuracy of an ultimate strength analysis.Theframe has a total height of 22.5 meters and the width is 12 meters. No bracing isprovided to the frame. Frame elements are realized by European profiles, shown inFig.5. This frame was analysed for two types of beam-to-column connections.
208 M. Petrina, Roxana Balc10.23kN31.7kN/m20.44kNHEB160IPE240HEB20049.1kN/m20.44kNHEB160IPE300HEB20049.1kN/m20.44kN20.44kNHEB220 HEB220IPE300IPE360HEB240 HEB24049.1kN/m49.1kN/m6x3.75 = 22.5m20.44kNHEB220IPE360HEB26049.1kN/mHEB220IPE400HEB2602x6 = 12mFigure 5. Structure schema75.93116.0312662.7343.2117.5252.9816.175.939.9762.7343.2135.4616.161.61 115.0553.4127.38 2.4132.85 162.6553.9971.19 21.217.31 49.0435.9811.93 16.8155.91 51.0425.612.04 13.5244.9726.02 172.7399.7 144.7 103.7942.969.821.0948.714.588.67 104.538.3 102.89 87.54 8.38.1113.355.2682.6 164.2381.659.6 47.1432.0665.9 172.69 38.2 6.1428.33 107.233.98139.5778.9 84.99 102.943.9631.7727.880.4586.74 167.0249.85 58.1180.45 188.4116.98 11.745.2351.1189.58 140.737.84 146.92.51 10.662.512.3710.2791.43 156.1933.42 88.483.0474.18 144.361.0974.199.9164.7564.11869.86.7670.1783.61 158.90.59.4689.41 103.64 59.8681.32126.6550.47a.b.Figure 6. Bending moments on six storey frame (kNm).
Page 1 and 2:
COMPUTATIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING2005
Page 3 and 4:
“Computational Civil Engineering.
Page 5 and 6:
A viscoelastic-plastic prediction o
Page 7 and 8:
6 F. Paulet-Crainiceanu, C. Ionescu
Page 9 and 10:
8 F. Paulet-Crainiceanu, C. Ionescu
Page 11 and 12:
10 F. Paulet-Crainiceanu, C. Ionesc
Page 13 and 14:
12 C. Anghel, D. OnchişIn these ex
Page 15 and 16:
14 C. Anghel, D. Onchişperformance
Page 17 and 18:
16 A.G. Popa, H.L. CucuThe finite e
Page 19 and 20:
18 A.G. Popa, H.L. CucuFigure 4. Di
Page 23 and 24:
22 A.G. Popa, H.L. CucuFigure 10. N
Page 25 and 26:
24 H. L. Cucu, A. G. Popaindependen
Page 27 and 28:
26 H. L. Cucu, A. G. Popa[ N](3x24)
Page 29 and 30:
28 H. L. Cucu, A. G. Popa· step 9)
Page 31 and 32:
30 H. L. Cucu, A. G. PopayyzPzqyxyx
Page 33 and 34:
32 H. L. Cucu, A. G. PopaRelative e
Page 35 and 36:
34 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. TurdaHigher ed
Page 37 and 38:
36 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. Turdaother way
Page 39 and 40:
38 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. Turdametaphori
Page 41 and 42:
40 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. Turdamany info
Page 43 and 44:
42 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. TurdaLosing a
Page 45 and 46:
44 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. Turdacompanies
Page 47 and 48:
46 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. TurdaUpon the
Page 49 and 50:
48 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. TurdaThe top v
Page 51 and 52:
50 F.-Zs. Gobesz, D. Turda4. CONCLU
Page 53:
52 P. Alexa, H. Mociran, and A. Mat
Page 56 and 57:
“Computational Civil Engineering
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159: “Computational Civil Engineering
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
show all

âComputational Civil Engineering - "Intersections" International Journal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

âComputational Civil Engineering - "Intersections" International Journal