12.07.2015 Views

Civil Defense Systems: Social Impact and ... - The Black Vault

Civil Defense Systems: Social Impact and ... - The Black Vault

Civil Defense Systems: Social Impact and ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNCLASS!FIEDDDC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7AU-67U 016 5/11 15/3IO'A STATE UNIV AMES DEPT OF SOCIOLOGY ANDANTHROPOLOGYA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY PO*ER STRUCTURES.A DELINEATION AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PO*ERSTRUCTURES IN FIVE IOWA COMMUNITIES. tU)DESCRIPTIVE NOTE:FINAL REPT~,AUG 67 3'(6P kOHLENqJUE *M ;BEAL*GEORaEM9 ;KLONGLANiGERALD Ee ;TAITqjOHN L.RLPTs NO. kURAL SOCIOLOGY-soCONTRACT: UAhCZO-67-C-O1Z3UNCLASSIFIED REPORTSUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: SEE ALSO AD-670 U17.OLSCRIPTORS: (.SOCIOLOGYt oCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)cLEAULRSHIP, SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY# SOCIOMETRICS,ATTIYUDES, DECISION MAKING,PECREPTION(PSYCHOLOGY), CIVIL DEFENSt PERSONNEL,PO*Evs STATJSTICAL ANALYSIS, IOWA (U)IUENTIFIERS; *cOAMUNSTY PO*ER STRUCTURES (U)TOE LOCAL COMMUNITY IS CONCEPTUALIZED AS A SOCIALSYSTEM. ONE OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE SOCIAL SYSTEM15 SOCIAL PO',, Rs A SOCIAL PcWER MODEL 15 DEFINEDWhICH MAY BE USED BY LOCAL CIVIL DEFENSE CHANCEAGENTS FOR ANALYZIN4 SOCIAL POOLR IN TKEIRCOMKUNITIES, THE MAJOR CONCEPTS OF THE SOCIALPO04R MODEL kRZ SOCIAL PO*EH, AUTSORITY, INFLUENCE,POh•E STRUCTURE, AND POWER &CYORS. THE ýOMiuNiTYMEmdERS W*o HAVE SOCIAL PQWFR AND AFFECT THECOMMUNITY DECISION-MAKING PROCESS ARE DESIGNATED ASPU4ER ACTORS. THE INTErRELATIONSH;PS OF THE MAJORCONCEPTS ARE STATED AS 6ENERA.. tYPOTHESLS. 7HESOCIAL POWER MODEL *AS OPERATIONAL1ZED IN FIVE IOWACOMMUNITIES. THE COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS IN EACl.COMMUNITY WERE INTcRYIEWED. THE COMMUNITv ACTORSPERCEIVED THAT SOCTAL POhER FXI.-TED IN THE COMMUNITY.THE COtmU;ITY PJWER A:IORS LXERLISEI SOCIAL PO6ERTO AFFECT THE O±TCOMES OF cuHMUNITY ISSUE AREAS.THEY AERE FOUND TO HAVE SIK!LAR PERSONAL AND SOCIALCHAKACTERISTICS. THE POAER ACTON5 HAD A STRUCTUREIN THEIR :NIE'PLRSONAL RELATIONS* TNE PCWERSTRUCTURES TENDED TO VARY BY ISSUE AREA TO A GREATEREXTENT AS THE SIZE OF THE COMMUNITY INCREASED. INTHE SMA.LLR COMMUNITIEs, THE TOP POWER ACTORS TENDEDTO BE HuLUING POSIT;ONS OF AtITHORITYs vHILE THE TOPPOvER ACTORS IN THE LAR4CR COMMUNITIES TENDED TO NOTBE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY AT THE PRESENT TIME. (U)UNCLASSIrIED/ZAML7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!