Civil Defense Systems: Social Impact and ... - The Black Vault

UNCLASSIFIEDU)DC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL Not /ZMML7Au-637 167 15/3 5/11MICHIGAN STATE UNIV EAST LANSING DEPT OFCOMMUNICATIONTHE DEVELOPMENT OF VALUES AND BELIEFS IN YOUNGAMERICANS TOWARD FALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVILDEFENSE.(U)DESCRIPTIVE NOTE! PILOT STUDY REPT. NO. 1oJAN 66 90P GREENBERGBRADLEYPETTERSENtDuANE IKOCHEVAR,JUHNS, IUNCLASSIFIEDREPORTSUPPLEMENTARY NOTE: REpT, ON COMMUNICATION RESEARCH,DESCRIPTORS: (*FALLOUT SHELTERS9 *PUBLIC OPINION),CHILDREN: ADOLESCENTSt ATTITUDES. CIVIL DEFENSESYSTEMS, SOCIAL SCIENCES, CULTURE, STATISTICALANALYSISIU)WHAT KINDS OF BELIEFS AND OPINIONS DO YOUNGSTERS INTHEIR PRE-TEEN AND TEENAGE YEARS HAVE TOWARD FALLOUTSHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE. 327 EIGHTH AND TWELFTHGRAoERS WROTE EXTEMPORANEOUS ESSAYS ON tfWHAT IKNOlv ABOUT FALLOUT SHELTERtst ATTITUDESTOhARD THIS TCPIC WERE ASSESSED BY TRAINED CODERS ONTHE BASIS OF THEIR DEGREE OF FAVORAILITY TONARDSFALLOUT SHELTERS IN GENERALo PRIVATE SHELTERSt PUBLICSHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE, EACH OF THE ATTITUDESWAS RELA T D TO AGE, SEX, RACE, SOCIAL CLASS ANDPERSON'L ABILI T Y OF THE YOUNGSTERS. GENERALLY,YOUNGSTERS HOLD FAVORABLE ATTITUDES TOOARD 30THFALLOUT SHELTERS AND CIVIL aEFENSE, AND THESEEXPRESSED ATTITUDES ARE STRONGLY HELD. IN TERMS OFAGEs THE YOUNGER STUDENTS ARE MORE FAVORABLE TOWARDBOTH TYPEb OF SHELTERS AND CIVIL DEFENSE IN GENERAL.SEX DIFFERENCES *ERE INSIGNIFICANT; HO*EVER. BOYSTENuED TO BE SOMEWHAT LESS FAVORABLE. ATTITUDES OFWHITE AND NON-WHITE YOUNGSTERS WERE STRIKINGLYDIFFERENT W!TH NON-hHI-E STUDENTS CONSISTENTLYEXPRESSING MORE FAVORABLE ATTITUDES TO*ARD bOTH5HELTER' AND CIVIL DEFENSE. SOCIAL CLASS APPEAREDT0 dE UNRELATED TO ATTITUDES EXPRESSED ON THIS TOPIC.A THIRD SIGNIFICANT CORRELATE OF ATTITUDES WASPERSONAL ABILITY. THE MORE ABLE STUDENTS WITHHOLDSUPPORT FROM BOTH SMELTERS AND C;VIL DEFENSE, wHILETHE LESS ABLE ON HiGHLY FAVORABLE. (AUTHOR) (U)79UNCLASSIFIED/ZMML7