Civil Defense Systems: Social Impact and ... - The Black Vault

UNCLASSIFIEDDoC REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY SEARCH CONTROL NO. /ZMML7AO-6ý6 996 5/10 15/3 13/13SIMAULMATICS CORP CAMBRIDGE MASSEVA6UATION OF COMMUNITY RESPONSE To FPH5PHO4RAMo(U)DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: FINAL REPT., 14 MAR-30 DEC 66aUEC 66 56P POOLITHIEL DE SOLA IYATES,JULES D. ftESTLAKEtM IUNCLASSIFIED REPORTDLSCRIPTORS: (*ATTITUDES$ OCIVIL DEFENSE SYSTEMS)$PUBLIC OPINION, IiUESTIONNAIRES, HOUSING,dUILDINGSt FALLOUT SHELTERS, ShIELDING,PSYCHOMETRICS, REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY) (U)IDENTIFIERS: EVALUATION (U)TAO SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED TO EVALUATE THE RESPONSEIN RHODE ISLAND TO A QUESTIONNAIRE ONEVALUATION OF FALLOUT PROTECTION IN HOMES.(FPHS) RECEIPT OF THE FPm5 WUESTIONNAIRE DID NOTSIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE ATTtTUDES TO*ARD CIVIL DEFENSEPROGRAMs, NOR DID IT RAISE THE LEVEL OF ANXIETY INTHE COMMUNITY. RECEIPT OF REPLIES TO THEHOUSEHOLDERS' RESPONSES (*{.CM PRECEDED THE SECONDSURVEY) DID RAISE THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS ABOUTCIVIL DEFENSE, WITODUT 5!6NIFICANTLY CHANGING THELEVEL OF ANXIETY OR CHANGING THE ACTIVITY OFHOUSEHOLDERS WITH REGARD TO A FALLOUT SHELTERpROGRAM. THE FPHS QUESTIONNAIRE PROGRAM, WHILEUSEFUL IN ELICITING INFORMATION# CANNOT BY ITSELFSERVE TO ENCOURAGE ACTION (TO ANY USEFUL DEGREE)?'Y THE PUBLIC WITH REGARD TO FALLOUT SHELTERS.(AUTHOR)(U)91UNCLASSIFIED/ZMNL?