12.07.2015 Views

Innovation in Construction A Project Life Cycle Approach

Innovation in Construction A Project Life Cycle Approach

Innovation in Construction A Project Life Cycle Approach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enablers of <strong>in</strong>novation:This question was <strong>in</strong>tended to help understand thefactors that are seen as significant <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novationwith<strong>in</strong> an organisation.Barriers to <strong>in</strong>novation:This question was <strong>in</strong>tended to elicit from therespondents the ma<strong>in</strong> barriers to <strong>in</strong>novation for theirfirms.Table 5: Enablers of <strong>in</strong>novationTo what extent do the follow<strong>in</strong>g factors help promote <strong>in</strong>novationwith<strong>in</strong> your organisation (1-5)?Table 6: Barriers to <strong>in</strong>novationTo what extent do the follow<strong>in</strong>g factors impede the uptake of<strong>in</strong>novation with<strong>in</strong> your organisation (1-5)?EnablersMeanLeadership 4.6Supportive work environment 4.4Collaboration with partners 4.4Deep understand<strong>in</strong>g of the customer 4.3Education & tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g policy 4.1Knowledge management practices 4.1Encourag<strong>in</strong>g staff to get <strong>in</strong>volved withexternal networks 3.9Use of problem solv<strong>in</strong>g techniques 3.7Awards, grants, funds 3.6Government schemes 3.5Reward schemes 3.3Emphasis on research & development 3.2The top two factors are seen to be leadership and asupportive work environment. These outweigh the othermore formal enablers which tends to <strong>in</strong>dicate that whereschemes are put <strong>in</strong> place without the surround<strong>in</strong>g ‘cultural’factors of leadership and supportive environmentthey are not likely to flourish. The next most significantfactors are collaboration with partners, and deep understand<strong>in</strong>gof the customer which re<strong>in</strong>forces the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsof the previous questions and strengthens the impressionthat <strong>in</strong>novative solutions are often co-developed atthe project level from with<strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. This is alsosuggested by Tatum (1987) who has shown that leadership,supportive organisational structure, collaboration,and customer orientation are the ma<strong>in</strong> enablers of <strong>in</strong>novationwith<strong>in</strong> the organisation. On the other hand,reward schemes and emphasis on R&D do not appearto be seen as significant enablers of <strong>in</strong>novation. In thecase of reward schemes this may be because it is a specifictype of scheme that may only be used <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>organisations, nevertheless the low rank<strong>in</strong>g of R&D asan enabler of <strong>in</strong>novation aga<strong>in</strong> appears to confirm thef<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the previous questions.BarriersMeanEconomic conditions 3.9Availability of f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources 3.6Fragmented nature of construction bus<strong>in</strong>ess 3.4Unwill<strong>in</strong>gness to change 3.3Lack of government role model 3.3Inappropriate legislation 3.3Risk <strong>in</strong> commercialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novations 3.2Temporary nature of construction projects 3.2Extensive <strong>in</strong>ter-organisational change required 3.1Lack of awareness 3.0Lack of qualified staff 3.0Lack of end-user <strong>in</strong>volvement 3.0Lack of <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>in</strong>vestments /procedures/ practices (R&D, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and education) 3.0Adversarial approaches with<strong>in</strong> thesupply cha<strong>in</strong> 2.9Lack of clear benefits 2.9Belief that the <strong>in</strong>dustry is do<strong>in</strong>g wellwithout <strong>in</strong>novation 2.8The two top barriers to <strong>in</strong>novation are clearly seen tobe economic conditions and availability of f<strong>in</strong>ancialresources. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that f<strong>in</strong>ancial concernscan both act as a driver and a barrier; there is aparadox <strong>in</strong> the sense that the companies surveyed claimto <strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease their profitability butbelieve that they cannot <strong>in</strong>novate unless economicsallow. These two factors are followed by a group of factorsled by the fragmented nature of construction followed byunwill<strong>in</strong>gness to change, lack of government supporand <strong>in</strong>appropriate legislation.11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!