12.07.2015 Views

chapter 1

chapter 1

chapter 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 8: Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample4. When the alternative is H a : µ < 5 , the formulation is such that the water is believed unsafeuntil proved otherwise. A type I error involved deciding that the water is safe (rejecting H o )when it isn’t (H o is true). This is a very serious error, so a test which ensures that this error ishighly unlikely is desirable. A type II error involves judging the water unsafe when it isactually safe. Though a serious error, this is less so than the type I error. It is generallydesirable to formulate so that the type 1 error is more serious, so that the probability of thiserror can be explicitly controlled. Using H a : µ > 5 , the type II error (now stating that thewater is safe when it isn’t) is the more serious of the two errors.5. Let σ denote the population standard deviation. The appropriate hypotheses areH : σ = .05 vs H : σ < . 05oa. With this formulation, the burden of proof is on the datato show that the requirement has been met (the sheaths will not be used unless H o can berejected in favor of H a . Type I error: Conclude that the standard deviation is < .05 mm whenit is really equal to .05 mm. Type II error: Conclude that the standard deviation is .05 mmwhen it is really < .05.6. Ho: µ = 40 vs Ha: µ ≠ 40 , where µ is the true average burn-out amperage for thistype of fuse. The alternative reflects the fact that a departure from µ = 40 in eitherdirection is of concern. Notice that in this formulation, it is initially believed that the value ofµ is the design value of 40.7. A type I error here involves saying that the plant is not in compliance when in fact it is. Atype II error occurs when we conclude that the plant is in compliance when in fact it isn’t.Reasonable people may disagree as to which of the two errors is more serious. If in yourjudgement it is the type II error, then the reformulation : µ = 150 H : µ µ2.Type I error: Conclude that the special laminate produces less warpage than the regular,when it really does not. Type II error: Conclude that there is no difference in the twolaminates when in reality, the special one produces less warpage.oa238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!