12.07.2015 Views

national populism and slovak – hungarian relations in - MEK

national populism and slovak – hungarian relations in - MEK

national populism and slovak – hungarian relations in - MEK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Grigorij MesežnikovNational Populism <strong>and</strong> Slovak – Hungarian Relations <strong>in</strong> Slovakia 2006 – 2009. Forum M<strong>in</strong>ority Research Institute Šamorín – Somorja, 2009Between 1993 <strong>and</strong> 1994, between 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> after the 2006 electionsit was part of government, which enabled it to participate <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>gpolicies <strong>in</strong> all relevant areas of public life. It is a radical <strong>national</strong>istic forcethat uses far-right <strong>and</strong> anti-communist rhetoric. It is a sworn opponent ofthe concept of civically def<strong>in</strong>ed political nation <strong>and</strong> advocates the conceptof ethnic nation. The SNS views the Slovak Republic as a <strong>national</strong> state ofethnic Slovaks; with respect to ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities, it promotes the concept ofassimilation that manifests primarily – but is not limited to – <strong>in</strong> a prioriquestion<strong>in</strong>g ethnic Hungarians’ loyalty to the Slovak Republic. On the ‘theoretical’level, this shows through question<strong>in</strong>g the fact that ethnicHungarians liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Slovakia are of truly Hungarian orig<strong>in</strong>; <strong>in</strong> practice, itshows through propos<strong>in</strong>g measures that complicate practical exercise of ethnicHungarians’ rights <strong>in</strong> the field of political representation, use of language,education, culture, regional development <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ties withHungary, which ethnic Hungarians consider their motherl<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms ofculture <strong>and</strong> language. In the mid-1990s, the SNS unsuccessfully campaignedto <strong>in</strong>troduce the system of so-called alternative education for childrenbelong<strong>in</strong>g to ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities. Its practical implementation would haveamounted to an irreparable decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard of exercis<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>orityrights with all sorts of political implications.SNS representatives have become notorious for us<strong>in</strong>g confrontationalrhetoric <strong>and</strong> aggressive tone; they regularly utter offensive statements withrespect to members of ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities <strong>and</strong> their political representatives.The party appeals to people with proclivity to <strong>national</strong>ist views <strong>and</strong> authoritarianconcepts of society’s political organization.Another political subject that can be considered a protagonist of <strong>national</strong><strong>populism</strong> <strong>in</strong> Slovakia is the People’s Party-Movement for a DemocraticSlovakia (HZDS). The party was founded <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1991 as a result of<strong>in</strong>ternal rift with<strong>in</strong> Public aga<strong>in</strong>st Violence (VPN), a revolutionary <strong>and</strong>reformist movement that was the architect of peacefully toppl<strong>in</strong>g the communistregime <strong>in</strong> 1989 <strong>and</strong> won <strong>in</strong> the first free parliamentary elections <strong>in</strong>June 1990. The <strong>in</strong>itiators of the split led by then Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister VladimírMeèiar advocated a model of transformation different from the ‘federal’model that was implemented <strong>in</strong> Slovakia between 1990 <strong>and</strong> 1992 by VPN<strong>and</strong> its coalition partners. Eventually they founded the HZDS that immediatelyga<strong>in</strong>ed political support, especially among those voters who were disenchantedby the course of the transformation process. Another item on themovement’s political agenda <strong>and</strong> an important factor beh<strong>in</strong>d its strong votersupport was the issue of dissolv<strong>in</strong>g the Czecho<strong>slovak</strong> Federation. TheHZDS profiled itself as the promoter of Slovaks’ ‘<strong>national</strong> aspirations’ <strong>and</strong>42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!