NCC Report No. 1 - (IMD), Pune

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Walker, G. T., 1923, Correlation in seasonal variations of weather, VIII, Apreliminary study of world weather, Mem. India Meteorol. Dept., 24, 75-131.Walker, G. T., 1924, Correlation in seasonal variations of weather, IV, A furtherstudy of world weather, Mem. India Meteorol. Dept., 24, 275-332.Wang,B., Ding, Q., Fu, X., Kang, I., Jin, K., Shukla, J., Doblas-Reyes, F., 2005,Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoonrainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, No. 15, L15711, doi. 10.1029/2005GL022734.Woodruff S.D., Diaz H.F., Elms J.D., Worley S.J., 1998, COADS release 2 data andmetadata enhancements for improvements of marine surface flux fields.Phys. Chem. Earth 23, 517-527.34
Table – 1 : Details of Predictors used for First Stage Forecast (SET-I)No. Parameter PeriodA1 North Atlantic SST Anomaly DEC+JANA2A3A4A5A6Equatorial SE Indian OceanSST AnomalyEast Asia Surface PressureAnomalyEurope Land Surface AirTemperature AnomalyNorthwest Europe surfacePressure Ano. TendencyWarm Water VolumeAnomalyFEB+MARFEB+MARSpatialDomain20N-30N,100W-80W20S-10S,100E-120E35N-45N,120E-140EC.C with ISMR(1951-2000)-0.400.450.33JAN 5 Stations 0.34DJF(0) –SON (-1)FEB+MAR65N-75N,20E-40E5S-5N,120E-80W-0.40-0.37Table – 2 : Details of Predictors used for Second Stage Forecast (SET-II)No. Parameter PeriodJ1 North Atlantic SST Anomaly DEC+JANJ2J3J4J5J6Equatorial SE Indian OceanSST AnomalyEast Asia Surface PressureAnomalyNino3.4 SST AnomalyTendencyNorth Atlantic PressureAnomalyNorth Central Pacific ZonalWind Anomaly at 850hpaFEB+MARFEB+MARMAM(0) -DJF(0)MayMaySpatialDomain20N-30N,100W-80W20S-10S,100E-120E35N-45N,120E-140E5S-5N,170W-120W35N-45N,30W-10W5N-15N,180E-150WC.C with ISMR(1951-2000)-0.400.450.33-0.40-0.30-0.4035
Page 2: NEW STATISTICAL MODELS FORLONG RANG
Page 5 and 6: For the long range forecasting (LRF
Page 9 and 10: computed as the average of surface
Page 11: tropical Pacific Ocean in boreal wi
Page 14 and 15: to a model with smallest model size
Page 16 and 17: using the best development period a
Page 18 and 19: the most “interesting” projecti
Page 20 and 21: Where, Net j denotes the weighted s
Page 22 and 23: The climatological forecast for a g
Page 24 and 25: period of 1981-2004 were 6.89% and
Page 26 and 27: chance of failure but no guarantee
Page 28 and 29: EMR-II were based on the data of 19
Page 30 and 31: ReferencesAngell J. K., 1981, Compa
Page 32 and 33: Iyengar R.N and Raghukanth, S.T.G.,
Page 34 and 35: Parthasarathy, B., Rupa Kumar, K. a
Page 38 and 39: Table - 3 : Inter-correlation among
Page 40 and 41: Table - 8: Model statistics of the
Page 42 and 43: SE INDIAN OCEAN SST ANOMALYSTD. ISM
Page 44 and 45: N. ATLANTIC MSLP ANOMALYSTD. ISMR32
Page 46 and 47: ADJUSTED R-SQUARE Vs MODEL SIZE: DA
Page 48 and 49: PERFORMANCE OF ENSEMBLE MODEL: JUNE
Page 50 and 51: 25PERFORMANCE OF ANN MODELS FOR THE

NCC Report No. 1 - (IMD), Pune

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?