Catalogue (Underhoull)SF Context Area CommentsNumber129 016 B ES169 053 B ES415 050 B ES710 133 B ES820 074 B ES1112 105 B Schist, pale to medium grey, quartzitic, consisting mainlyof parallel lengths of fine to medium-grained quartzcrystals with only sparse minute micaceous minerals,producing a strongly lineated texture (similar to some rocksin the Grampians formerly known as ‘schistose grits’). Themost likely source in Shetland would appear to be in theScatsta Quartzitic Group (Mykura 1976, 24-25, plate IV)1504 196 B ES1533 190 A ES1831 199 B Schist, pale brownish grey, quartz-mica, with moderateschistosity, consisting mainly of medium to coarse-grainedlenticular, mutually parallel, quartz in a very fine-grainedmatrix of sub-parallel micaceous minerals, quartz andsparse indeterminate minerals. The lenticular texturesuggests a mylonitic source, i.e. due to shearing in one ofthe many fault or thrust zones in the Shetland Islands1969 154 B (Two fragments) ES1973 220 B ESTable 3.2: Catalogue of the whetstones recovered from the Upper House, UnderhoullCommentsSome of the Eidsborg Schist hones, particularly those from Hamar, have undergone postusagediscolouration, in effect bleaching, and small scale erosion. In certain hones theerosion has weakened the muscovite (white mica)-rich schistose laminae, causing splittingalong the hones, whereas in others it has produced minute hollows, presumably wherequartz grains have become loosened within the lithological matrix and ‘popped’ out. Ingeological environments bleaching (e.g. of red feldspars in granites) is normally due toacidic groundwater from overlying peat or other natural organic-rich deposits. This reactioncan apply also in archaeological environments but in these situations localised acidicgroundwater from cesspits and similar humanly induced accumulations can have the samebleaching effect. It is understood, however, that neither at the Hamar site nor theUnderhoull site are any natural organic deposits, cesspits or animal-waste deposits. Thenature of the bleaching agency, therefore, remains uncertain.The small-scale erosion affecting the hones, as referred to above, is even more inexplicable.Quartz, and to a lesser extent muscovite, are the main components of Eidsborg Schist. Both36
minerals are chemically stable in natural earth surface conditions, and both are commonconstituents of sedimentary rocks, having survived cycles of large scale denudation,transport and redeposition spanning many tens of millions of years. Three other mineralsare commonly present in the schist, but only in minute quantities. Biotite and chlorite arechemically stable in most natural conditions, although they do not normally survive thephysical rigours of the denudation-to-redeposition cycles. Calcite will dissolve in acidicgroundwater but it seems unlikely that there is sufficient calcite in Eidsborg Schist evenpartly to desegregate (i.e. loosen) the quartz and/or muscovite and so produce the smallscaleerosion observed.3.2.3 Steatite and related schist artefactsTHE ASSEMBLAGE FROM THE UPPER HOUSE, UNDERHOULLBake platesThere are three finds within this category made of schist, SF647 (context [185]), SF1799(context [189]) and SF1212 (context [053]). Of these, only SF1799 is definitely a bakeplate fragment, and it is large, measuring over 150mm across and just 9mm thick with toolmarks around the edge. Each of these finds does however lack the detailed grooving seenon one or both faces of the finds from Hamar <strong>2008</strong>. The type has been discussed in relationto the examples from Hamar <strong>2008</strong> (below) and commonly the stones identified as schist areusually considered to be Scandinavian imports, whereas the ones identified as steatite areconsidered to be from Shetland and of a slightly earlier date. In this case certainly thethickness would seem to support an origin within Shetland rather than it being an import.VesselsThere are 102 finds which have been identified as parts of vessels; around 20 of these areclearly worked pieces which are likely to be vessel sherds, but which survive in a formwhich is either too fragmentary or undiagnostic to be certain. Amongst the sherds whichcan be clearly distinguished, there is a variety of vessel forms to be seen. The morecommonly identified hemispherical form is represented for example in SF1529 (context[190]) and there is a variety of wall thicknesses to be seen throughout the assemblage inthis form (eg SF1415, (context [168]) has a thick wall measuring some 23mm whereasSF1092 (context [149]) mm is thin walled (only 8mm). Flat bottomed vessel forms areindicated by SF1063 and SF1064 (context [138]), and in some examples these are clearlyfrom squared vessels (such as SF831, context [074]) and the corner sherds SF1487 (context[169]) and SF1094 (context [123]). Other forms include more unusual examples of troughs,for example, SF1062 (context [074]), and SF867 (context [142]) is clearly oval in form andmay have been trimmed down slightly.There is a great variety in the thickness and indeed finishing treatment of the vessel walls.SF1965 (context [050]) is a large vessel of thick walling some 17mm across, and SF1957(context [185]) is slightly thinner at 12mm. This latter sherd has also very smooth inner andouter wall surfaces in contrast to SF1983 (context [213]) which is from a thick walled largevessel whose surfaces are deeply gouged. Very fine walled vessels are indicated by anumber of sherds, such as SF702 (context [074]) and SF803 (context [070]) and37
- Page 1 and 2: VIKING UNST PROJECTEXCAVATIONS AT H
- Page 3 and 4: This is a provisional report on the
- Page 5 and 6: PART TWO: PERSONNEL AND RELATED RES
- Page 7 and 8: PART ONEEXCAVATIONS AT HAMAR &THE U
- Page 9 and 10: A geophysical survey of the site wa
- Page 11 and 12: The 2006 & 2007 excavation seasonsT
- Page 13 and 14: sites are multiperiod settlements s
- Page 15 and 16: more complex; geophysics would be a
- Page 17 and 18: floor surface included fragments of
- Page 19 and 20: Lower room & ash pitWork also concl
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 2.2: Plan of the sunken floo
- Page 23 and 24: External DepositsA section was exca
- Page 25 and 26: along the north edge (open side) of
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 2.5: The south east annexe,
- Page 29 and 30: At the lower (easternmost) end of t
- Page 31 and 32: 3. SUMMARY OF FINDS FROM THE 2008 S
- Page 33 and 34: 46mm) with working marks on three s
- Page 35: 3.2.2 A geological assessment of th
- Page 39 and 40: the same stone. SF721 (context [117
- Page 41 and 42: context [185] is a fine example of
- Page 43 and 44: close proximity of steatite outcrop
- Page 45 and 46: oom. The three body sherds are fair
- Page 47 and 48: Greenland and Iceland that a number
- Page 49 and 50: channel changes from U-shaped to V-
- Page 51 and 52: 4. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCEJ.M. Bond,
- Page 53 and 54: The cereals recovered are hulled si
- Page 55 and 56: five barley grains and a single oat
- Page 57 and 58: 4.3.2 The Upper House, UnderhoullAs
- Page 59 and 60: [176]. The identification of microl
- Page 61 and 62: iron within the soils (Gaffney & Ga
- Page 63 and 64: 63Figure 4.1: The graphical represe
- Page 65 and 66: SitecodeSamplecodeContext SFnumberA
- Page 67 and 68: presence of tephra within the depos
- Page 69 and 70: has been widely criticised as too g
- Page 71 and 72: Outram, Z., Cussans, J.E., Summers,
- Page 73 and 74: Level Two StudentsKirsty BennellJoh
- Page 75 and 76: 8. BIBLIOGRAPHYAlsvik, H. and Batey
- Page 77 and 78: Davidson, D.A. and Simpson, I.A. 20
- Page 79 and 80: McDonnell, J.G. 2000. Pyrotechnolog
- Page 81 and 82: 700s-800s: a potential alternative