13.07.2015 Views

site characterisation study - phases 1 and 2 - HKU Libraries - The ...

site characterisation study - phases 1 and 2 - HKU Libraries - The ...

site characterisation study - phases 1 and 2 - HKU Libraries - The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 6 -In Phase 2 the Group 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 techniques were further tested at four new <strong>site</strong>s againconsisting of, two pre-war masonry walls, one cut slope <strong>and</strong> one fill slope. <strong>The</strong> Phase 2 <strong>site</strong>s hadno existing ground investigation data so as to allow the Working Group to assess if thegeophysical methods alone can be reliable <strong>and</strong> accurate without any pre-conceptions of the <strong>site</strong>conditions. Preliminary interpretations were made by each of the contractors based solely on thegeophysical results. Subsequent conventional ground investigations by GEO were then carriedout at the <strong>site</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the results were given to each of the contractors for re-interpretation of theirgeophysical results.<strong>The</strong> Phase 2 trials concluded that the overall quality of the raw data <strong>and</strong> interpretationsvaried significantly with the expertise of the individual geophysics teams. Certain contractorswere able to demonstrate that a combined geophysical investigation utilising GPR <strong>and</strong> RI canlocate the back of masonry walls if they are less than 3m thick <strong>and</strong> define zones of elevatedmoisture content <strong>and</strong> voids with reasonable accuracy. Only limited success was achieved indetermining the location of corestones <strong>and</strong> the thickness of loose fill at the two slope <strong>site</strong>s.In the light of the conclusions from the field trials, it is recommended that due to theinconsistent raw data <strong>and</strong> interpretations it would not be advisable at present to let a termcontract specifically for non-invasive geophysical techniques for <strong>site</strong> <strong>characterisation</strong> in HongKong, or to require the use of such techniques in LPM studies. Also, further trials of the four orother techniques are not warranted. However, since some of the results were encouraging it isrecommended that further research work on developing GPR <strong>and</strong> RI for masonry wallinvestigations is carried out through a local University with support from GEO. <strong>The</strong> researchshould focus on ways to enhance the resolution of the two techniques <strong>and</strong> also to develop a <strong>site</strong><strong>and</strong> data processing methodology which would ensure more consistent results from contractors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!