- 94 -Matthews, M.C., Hope, V.S., Clayton, C.R.I (in press 5 ). <strong>The</strong> use of surface waves in thedetermination of ground stiffness profiles. To be published in the Proceedings of theInstitution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Journal, p 20.McDowell, P.W. (1975). Detection of clay filled pipes. Quarterly Journal of EngineeringGeology. 8. pp 303-310.McDowell, P. (1981). Recent developments in geophysical techniques for the rapid location ofnear surface anomalous ground conditions. Groimd Engineering, vol. 14, no., pp. 20-23.McNeill, DJ. (1995). Application of electromagnetic techniques to environmental geophysicalsurveys. Geonics Limited booklet of selected papers <strong>and</strong> examples in groundwaterenvironmental geotechnical <strong>and</strong> buried hazardous waste detection Unpublished, Ontario,Canada, p 8.Miller, R.D., Steeples, D.W., Hill, R.W., Jr. & Gaddis, B.L. (1990). Identifying Intra-AUuvial<strong>and</strong> Bedrock Structures Shallower than 30 Meters using Seismic Reflection Techniques.Geotechncal <strong>and</strong> Environmental Geophysics. 1st Edition, edited by Ward, S.H., SeriesEditor Neitzel, E.B., Investigations in Geophysics. No. 5. Society of ExplorationGeophysicists, Tulsa, pp. 89-97.Nelson, R.G. & Haigh, J.H. (1990). Geophysical Investigations of Sinkholes in LateriticTerrain's. Geotechncal <strong>and</strong> Environmental Geophysics. 1st Edition, edited by Ward,S.H., Series Editor Neitzel, E.B., Investigations in Geophysics, No. 5. Society ofExploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 133-153.Nobes, D.C (1994) Troubled waters: environmental applications of electric <strong>and</strong> electromagneticmethods. 12th Workshop. Brest, pp 125-158.Noon, D.A., Longstaff, D. & Yelf, RJ. (1994). Advances in the development of step frequencyground penetrating radar. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on GroundPenetrating Radar. (GPR'94) r Ontario, pp. 117-131.Northmore, K. <strong>and</strong> Jackson, P.(1995) Tropical roads-preventing embankment collapse.Earthworks PDA. Issue 7, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, pp 5.Papamarinopoulos, StP., Papaioannou, M.G., Kappopoulos, X. & Balalsas, Y. (1995). Multiplegeophysical studies at urban central environment of Athens in connection with theconstruction of metro's main station. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics toEngineering aM Environmental Problems. S AGERP 95, Florida, pp. 159-169 .Piccolo, M. & Zanelli, A. (1994). GPR surveys inside an hydroelectric water supply tunnel toinvestigate the rock-concrete interface <strong>and</strong> the fractures affecting the host rocks.Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Riftfer, GPR'94Ontario, pp 914-923.
- 95 -Pullan, S.E. & Hunter, J.A. (1990). Delineation of Buried Bedrock Valleys Using the OptimumOffset Shallow Seismic Reflection Technique. Geotechnical <strong>and</strong> Environmental•Geophysics, 1st Edition, edited by Ward, S.H., Series Editor Neitzel, E.B., Investigationsin Geophysics, No, 5, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 75-87.Ridley Thomas, N.W. (1982). <strong>The</strong> application of engineering geophysical techniques to <strong>site</strong>investigations in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Seventh South East Asian GeotechnicalConference, vol. 1, Hong Kong, pp. 205-226.Robillard, C, Niccolas, P., Armirat, P., Gariepy, M. & Goupil, F. (1994). Shallow bedrockprofiling using GPR. Proceedings of <strong>The</strong> Fifth International Conference on GroundPerpetrating Radar. GPR'94 r Ontario, pp. 1167-1179.Roggenthen, W.M. (1993). Pulsed GPR detection of voids in layered geologic materials.Proceedings of the Fourth Tunnel Detection Symposium on Subsurface ExplorationTechnology. Golden, Colorado, pp 85-92Sasahara, K., Tsuchida, T. & Fenner, TJ. (1995). An investigation of cracks in rock slope usingground penetrating radar. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application ofGeophysics to Engineering <strong>and</strong> Environmental Problems. SAGEEP 95. Florida, pp149458.Scullion, T. & Saarenketo, T. (1995). Ground penetrating radar technique in monitoring defectsin roads <strong>and</strong> highways. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysicsto Engineering <strong>and</strong> Environmental Problems. SAGEEP 95. Florida, pp 63-72.Siggins, A.F. (1990). Ground penetrating radar in geotechnical applications. ExplorationGeophysics, vol. 2L no., pp. 175-186.Steven, K. & Michael, B. (1992). <strong>The</strong> development of energy's ground penetrating radar (gpr),an fm-cw system. Unknown Source, pp 44-64.Stokoe, K.H., Wright, S.G., Bay, J.A. & Roesset, J.M. (1994). Characterisation of GeotechnicalSites by SASW Method. Geophysical Characterisation of Sites. Volume Prepared byISSME Technical Commitee # 10 for XTO International Conference on Soil Mechanics<strong>and</strong> Foundation Engineering. New Deli, India.pp. 15-25Thomas, J.F. (1992). Recent advances in subsurface interface radar technology. Proceedings ofthe Fourth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Geological Survey ofFinl<strong>and</strong>, Espoo, Finl<strong>and</strong>, pp 1349.Vaish, J.N. & Gupta, S.C. (1994). Detection of an ab<strong>and</strong>oned mining channel under aresidential complex by ground penetrating radar. Proceedings of the Fifth InternationalConference on Ground Penetrating Radar. GPR'94. Florida, pp 1193-1199.Ward, S,H. (1990). Resistivity <strong>and</strong> T^H^H Polarisation ; Tteotechnical- <strong>and</strong> EnvironmentalGeophysics. 1st Edition, edited by Ward, S.H., Series Editor Neitzel, E.B., Investigationsin Geophysics, No. 5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 147-189.
- Page 1:
SITE CHARACTERISATIONSTUDY - PHASES
- Page 4 and 5:
- 2 -© The Government of the Hong
- Page 6 and 7:
- 4 -FOREWORDThis report presents t
- Page 8 and 9:
- 6 -In Phase 2 the Group 1 and 2 t
- Page 10 and 11:
- 8 -3.3.6 Self Potential (SP) 173.
- Page 12 and 13:
- 10 -1. INTRODUCTIONThe collapse o
- Page 14 and 15:
- 12 -(v) Zones of enhanced moistur
- Page 16 and 17:
- 14 -contrasts in electrical, dens
- Page 18 and 19:
- 16 -A total of 4 drillholes and 1
- Page 20 and 21:
- 18 -The time-domain electromagnet
- Page 22 and 23:
- 20 -the GI data, final interpreta
- Page 24 and 25:
- 22 -4.2.5 Trial Site H - Fill Slo
- Page 26 and 27:
- 24 -4.4 Ground Investigation4,4.1
- Page 28 and 29:
- 26 -Figure 19 shows the different
- Page 30 and 31:
- 28 -estimate of wall thickness fr
- Page 32 and 33:
- 30 -techniques and also to develo
- Page 34 and 35:
- 32 -TIST OF FIGURESFigureNo.PageN
- Page 38:
- 36 -
- Page 51 and 52: - 49 -
- Page 53: - 51 -
- Page 58 and 59: - 56 -
- Page 63: - 61 -
- Page 68: - 66 -
- Page 71 and 72: - 69 -APPENDIX ASITE CHARACTERISATI
- Page 73 and 74: - 71 -A.I OBJECTIVETo assess the ca
- Page 75 and 76: - 73 -to take a driven sample at th
- Page 77 and 78: - 75 -A.8 PRELIMINARY THOUGHTS ON F
- Page 79 and 80: - 77 -APPENDIX BGEOPHYSICS LITERATU
- Page 81 and 82: - 79 -B.2.5.2 Case Histories 89B.2.
- Page 83 and 84: - 81 -Acoustic P-wave velocity meas
- Page 85 and 86: - 83 -a cut slope were successfully
- Page 87 and 88: - 85 -Analysis of Surface Waves (SA
- Page 89 and 90: - 87 -B.2.4.2 Frequency-Domain Elec
- Page 91 and 92: - 89 -The depth of penetration of a
- Page 93 and 94: - 91 -(vi) Ground Penetrating Radar
- Page 95: - 93 -Hall, D.H. and Hajnal, Z. (19
- Page 99 and 100: - 97 -Butler, D. & Pedersen, E.P. (
- Page 101 and 102: - 99 -Guenther, M. & Kathage, A.F.
- Page 103 and 104: - 101 -Maynard, K.C. & Field, O.K.
- Page 105 and 106: - 103 -Stokoe, K.H., Nazarian, S.,
- Page 111 and 112: - 109 -Table B2 - A Summary of GPR
- Page 113 and 114: - Ill -Figure Bl - Shallow Seismic
- Page 115 and 116: - 113 -
- Page 117 and 118: - 115 -
- Page 119 and 120: - 117 -APPENDIX CPROFILES OF CONTRA
- Page 121 and 122: - 119 -C.I PHASE 1 FIELD TRTATSBach
- Page 123 and 124: - 121 -The Institute of Geophysical
- Page 125 and 126: - 123 -LIST OF TABLESTableNo.PageNo
- Page 127 and 128: - 125 -1. Main Contractor :Bachy So
- Page 129 and 130: - 127 -Table C3 - Contractor Profil
- Page 131 and 132: - 129 -1. Main Contractor :Guangdon
- Page 133 and 134: - 131 -Table C7- Contractor Profile
- Page 135 and 136: - 133 -1. Main Contractor:Meinhardt
- Page 137 and 138: - 135 -Table Cl 1 - Contractor Prof
- Page 139 and 140: - 13'1. Main Contractor:Golder Asso
- Page 141 and 142: - 139 -1. Main Contractor:Bachy Sol
- Page 143 and 144: - 141 -Table C17 - Contractor Profi
- Page 145 and 146: - 143 -1. Main Contractor:Guangdong
- Page 147 and 148:
- 145 -Table C21 - Contractor Profi
- Page 149 and 150:
- 147 -APPENDIX DASSESSMENT OF THE
- Page 151 and 152:
- 149 -D.7 THERMAL IMAGING 161D.7.1
- Page 153 and 154:
- 151 -exception of TB04. Generally
- Page 155 and 156:
- 153 -(c) GSC present pseudo-dispe
- Page 157 and 158:
- 155 -interpretations of subsurfac
- Page 159 and 160:
- 157 -None of the contractors carr
- Page 161 and 162:
- 159 -D.5.2.2 Assessment of the MT
- Page 163 and 164:
- 161 -was generally used by all co
- Page 165 and 166:
- 163 -LIST OF TABLESTableNo.PageNo
- Page 167 and 168:
- 165 -LISTOFPT.ATF.SPlateNo.PageNo
- Page 169 and 170:
- 167 -plateNo.PageN aD2 1 Sting no
- Page 171 and 172:
- 169 -
- Page 173 and 174:
- 171 -
- Page 175 and 176:
- 173 -
- Page 177 and 178:
- 175 -
- Page 179 and 180:
- 177 -
- Page 181 and 182:
- 179 -
- Page 186:
- 184 -
- Page 194 and 195:
- 192 -CONTENTSPageNo.CONTENTS 192E
- Page 196 and 197:
- 194 -signal to improve the signal
- Page 198 and 199:
- 196 -well with the GPR results an
- Page 200:
- 198 -TXST OF FIGURESFigureNo.Page
- Page 210 and 211:
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OFFICE PUB
- Page 212 and 213:
Report on the Shum Wan Road Landsli
- Page 214 and 215:
Report on the Rainstorm of August 1
- Page 216 and 217:
Conventional and CRS Rowe Cell Cons
- Page 218 and 219:
Report on the Ching Cheung Road Lan
- Page 220 and 221:
Geology of the Western New Territor
- Page 222 and 223:
Shan Pui: Superficial Geology (1:5
- Page 224:
GE ° PUbHCati ° nS (eXCept Sheet