13.07.2015 Views

UIC Project Annual Report - ERTMS

UIC Project Annual Report - ERTMS

UIC Project Annual Report - ERTMS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ETCS<strong>UIC</strong> code I/92/E/051<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2004 DOCUMENT CODIFICATION REV. PAGEC 11 of 212.3.8 ETCS operational simulation at ÖBB and CFRTogether with the University of Aachen, ÖBB and CFR, a study on this topic is carried out. Theuniversity already has a simulation tool for LZB and PZB, so the first action will be to update thistool with the ETCS characteristics for Level 1 with and without infill, and for Level 2.It is the aim of the study to have a report available that documents the differences in e.g.capacity on a line with INDUSI I 60, INDUSI PZB 90, ETCS level 1 and ETCS level 1 with infill.At present, data is collected for the study of the selected parts of the lines Vienna – Salzburgand Wels - Passau, as well as a section of Corridor IV in Romania.A first draft report is expected by the middle of 2005.2.3.9 Support to the AEIF change request organisation2.3.9.1 Future FRS 4.29 review to be organizedDuring the AEIF CCB meetings, the <strong>ERTMS</strong> Users Group has proposed the establishment of areview of the FRS 4.29, so that it conforms to the UNISIG SRS 3.0.0. Beyond this review, thereis a need for an FRS document covering the functions needed for the Conventional Rail andwhere the functions needed for this operation are introduced as mandatory in the FRS inaccordance with recognised change requests. The general comments elaborated in 2002 by theTSI FRS ad hoc group should also be considered.At present, the <strong>ERTMS</strong> Users Group is analysing the economical impact of such a review.This next version of the FRS will be conform to the next SRS Version 3.0.0 and also cover thefunctions needed for the conventional rail network. This version of the FRS should be availableand referenced in the TSI CCS Annex A by the middle of 2005. <strong>UIC</strong> will deliver an input to thisreview. Preparatory work has been initialised in 2004 on this topic e.g. by considering the FRSfor the new mode limited supervision.2.3.9.2 Euroloop (Infill by cable)ÖBB, <strong>UIC</strong> and EEIG arranged a meeting including a trip on the ÖBB ETCS line in May 2004.It was demonstrated during the trip that the level 1 infill function is needed for capacity as wellas for safety reasons. EEIG chaired the meeting where the future infill users were invited fromthe railways as well as the UNISIG Companies. ÖBB stated clearly that it needs a stablesituation for the specifications with clear references listed in the TSI CCS Annex A due to thefact that in the near future, the ÖBB will launch a tender for the lines Vienna - Salzburg as wellas Wels – Passau. A. Colaço, J. Tamarit and P. Froesig stated clearly in common that this mustbe the aim in 2004.2.3.9.3 ETCS Level Crossing functionsTogether with the concerned Railway administrations, EEIG and PKP, the <strong>UIC</strong> ETCS projectteam has produced several explanatory scenarios to give a clear functional description of thefuture content of the SRS. At the AEIF CCB meeting 16 June, the railway requirements were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!