03.12.2012 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 O. Dilly<br />

extensive root densities frequently present in grassland soils may stimulate<br />

the development of the microbial biomass via exudation of readily available<br />

C compounds and root litter (Cheng et al. 1996; Grayston et al. 1996). In<br />

contrast, careless cultivation and stress factors reduce microbial biomass<br />

more rapidly than organic matter content, leading to low Cmic/Corgvalues<br />

(Sparling 1997).<br />

The Cmic/Corgratio, named ‘microbial quotient’ by Sparling (1992), is<br />

considered an indicator for biological activity and accumulation of organic<br />

matter in soil (Sparling 1992; Swift and Wommer 1993; both in Elliott 1994).<br />

Thus, the soil microbial biomass content is regulated by the site-, soiland<br />

management-specific quantity and quality of the organic substrate<br />

(Sparling 1992). The Cmic/Corgratio integrates the quality of soil properties<br />

looking at the extent of microbial colonisation. High values indicate that<br />

the biotope favours the establishment and energetic metabolism of many<br />

microorganisms.<br />

The efficiency of soil microorganisms for transforming energy sources<br />

controls microbial growth for which the qCO2 is used as an indirect easily<br />

determinable indicator. This indicator evaluates, with the Cmic/Corg ratio,<br />

the specific C mineralisation rate and the eco-physiological status of<br />

the soil microbiota (Insam et al. 1996), the succession stage (Insam and<br />

Haselwandter 1989), reflects the current energetic maintenance requirement<br />

and catabolic metabolism (Anderson 1994), and refers so far to the<br />

efficiency of the microbial metabolism (Wardle and Ghiani 1995). The term<br />

‘eco-physiology’ is used here to evaluate the microbial biomass as a single<br />

organism with reference to its environment.<br />

The maintenance requirement of actively metabolising microbial communities<br />

ranged in a similar order of magnitude to the qCO2 value (Anderson<br />

and Domsch 1985a). In contrast, the maintenance requirement of<br />

dormant organisms is more than ten-fold lower (Anderson and Domsch<br />

1985b). Therefore, the qCO2 is used for the estimation of the maintenance<br />

requirement of the soil microbiota (Joergensen 1995) although there may<br />

be some variation as to the precise maintenance carbon requirement (Anderson<br />

and Domsch 1985a).<br />

Under unfavourable conditions, the organisms require more energy to<br />

sustain the biomass, therefore, qCO2 values are enhanced and the carbon is<br />

lost. High qCO2 values indicate stress such as high heavy metal availability<br />

(Fließbach et al. 1995). The qCO2 valueisalsoenhancedwhentheSOM<br />

contains high amounts of readily available compounds (Fig. 3; Cheng et al.<br />

1996; Dilly and Munch 1996). Consequently, the qCO2/Corg ratio refers to<br />

the interrelationship between C-use efficiency and quality of the available<br />

organic matter in soil.<br />

Figure 6 demonstrates the concept for the use of the qCO2/Corg ratio: the<br />

value increases and simultaneously the C-use efficiency declines when half

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!