03.12.2012 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 L. Philippot and J.C. Germon<br />

to estimate the respective contributions of nitrification and denitrification<br />

to these emissions, indicating that both mechanisms can be alternatively the<br />

dominant processes depending on the environmental conditions (Stevens<br />

et al. 1997). The denitrification part in N2O emissions was determined in<br />

several studies: in their review Pratt et al. (1997) consider that 5–10% of<br />

denitrified nitrogen is on average emitted as N2O while Aulack et al. (1992)<br />

mention that the proportion of N2O in gaseous denitrification products<br />

can vary from 0 to 100%. However, the specific contribution for a given soil<br />

can be less variable (Germon and Jacques 1990). Hénault et al. (2001) determined<br />

this contribution by comparing denitrification and N2O emission<br />

kinetics in different situations. They showed that the transient accumulation<br />

of N2O during denitrification in laboratory conditions appeared to be<br />

a relevant indicator of soil in situ N2O emissions and suggested an empirical<br />

index. Recent studies underlined that the quality of the denitrifying<br />

community (size, composition, enzyme induction) must be taken into account<br />

when trying to understand and to model N2Ofieldfluxesfromsoils<br />

(Holtan-Hartwig et al. 2000; Cavigelli and Robertson 2001).<br />

In conclusion, soil microorganisms carry out processes that are important<br />

to ecosystem function, such as maintaining soil fertility by cycling the<br />

nitrogen. With the development of molecular genetic tools in microbial<br />

ecology, rapid progress has been made in the field especially for bacteria<br />

contributing to the N cycle (Bothe et al. 2000; Kowalchuk and Stephen 2001;<br />

Zehr et al. 2003). However, formulating meaningful conclusions about the<br />

importance of diversity within these functional groups is still difficult and<br />

the relative contribution of the different bacterial populations to the N<br />

transformation processes remains unclear. This brings a new challenge for<br />

soil microbiologists, i.e., relating microbial diversity to ecosystem functioning.<br />

<strong>References</strong><br />

Amarger N (2001) Rhizobia in the field. Adv Agron 73:109–167<br />

Anthonisen A, Loehr R, Prakasam T, Srinath E (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia<br />

and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48:835–852<br />

Atlas R, Bartha R (1993) Microbial ecology. Benjamin/Cummings , Redwood City, CA, 563<br />

pp<br />

Aulack M, Doran J, Mosier A (1992) Soil denitrification: significance, measurements and<br />

effect of management. Adv Soil Sci 18:1–57<br />

Baldani J, Oliveira A, Guimaraes S, Baldani V, Reis F, Silva L, Reis V, Teixera K, Döberiner<br />

J (2000) Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in nonleguminous plants, the role of endophytic<br />

diatozotrophs. In: Pedrosa F, Hungria H, Yates G, Newton W (eds) Nitrogen<br />

fixation: from molecules to crop productivity. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 397–400<br />

Bartosch S, Hartwig C, Spieck E, Bock E (2002) Immunological detection of Nitrospira-like<br />

bacteria in various soils. Microb Ecol 43:26–33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!