03.12.2012 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206 J.M. Barea, R. Azcón and C. Azcón-Aguilar<br />

conclusionsfromthisreviewaresummarizedbelow,beforethereportof<br />

a model experiment carried out in this laboratory (Requena et al. 2001).<br />

According to Miller and Jastrow (2000), understanding the contributions<br />

of mycorrhizal fungi to the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates is<br />

necessary to realize the hierarchical nature of the mechanisms involved in<br />

aggregation. In the frame of this chapter, only the microbially mediated processes<br />

will be mentioned (see Miller and Jastrow 2000 for information on<br />

other factors). In a first stage, soil particles are bound together by bacterial<br />

products and by structures of saprophytic and mycorrhizal fungi into stable<br />

microaggregates (2–20 µm in diameter). These are bound by microbial<br />

products into larger microaggregates (20–250 µm in diameter), in which<br />

bacterial polysaccharides act as binding agents. Microaggregates are then<br />

bound into macroaggregates (> 250 µm in diameter), a process in which<br />

bacterial polysaccharides act as binding agents and the mycorrhizal mycelia<br />

contribute by increasing the size of macroaggregates. Such a mycorrhizal<br />

role is accounted for by the size, branching habits and three-dimensional<br />

structure of the external mycelium colonizing the soil surrounding the root<br />

(Miller and Jastrow 2000), an activity that can persists up to 22 weeks after<br />

theplanthaddied(TisdallandOades1980).<br />

The effect of the mycorrhizal mycelium in the formation of water-stable<br />

soil aggregates has been evidenced in different ecological situations (Andrade<br />

et al. 1995, 1998; Bethlenfalvay et al. 1999; Requena et al. 2001), and the<br />

involvement of glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by the external hyphae of<br />

mycorrhizal fungi, has been demonstrated (Wright and Upadhyaya 1998).<br />

Glomalin has been suggested to contribute to hydrophobicity of soil particles<br />

and, because of its glue-like hydrophobic nature, it also participates in<br />

the initiation and stabilization of soil aggregates (Miller and Jastrow 2000).<br />

The importance of mycorrhizosphere interactions in improving soil<br />

structure was investigated in a revegetation experiment aimed at restoring<br />

a degraded Mediterranean ecosystem in southern Spain (Requena et al.<br />

2001). This experiment used a shrub legume belonging to the natural succession<br />

and dual mycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculation, a biotechnology<br />

that has received considerable attention in the last decade (Herrera et al.<br />

1993). The experiments carried out by Requena et al. (2001) aimed at assessing<br />

the long-term benefits of inoculation with these two types of plant<br />

microsymbionts not only on the establishment of the target legume species,<br />

but also on changes in key physicochemical soil properties known to affect<br />

soil quality (Kennedy and Smith 1995). In particular, the effect on soil structure,<br />

plant nutrient availability, organic matter content, microbial activity,<br />

etc., was analyzed as their degradation is often concomitant to disturbance<br />

of natural plant communities, as a result of the degradation/desertification<br />

processes(JeffriesandBarea2001).<br />

The experiments were carried out under field conditions in a represen-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!