03.12.2012 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 S. Scheu, L. Ruess and M. Bonkowski<br />

nitrifiers with important implications for nutrient cycling and ecosystem<br />

functioning. Changes in the composition of the bacterial community are<br />

also likely to be responsible for hormone-like effects of protozoa on plant<br />

growth. The effects of fungal grazers on plant performance strongly depend<br />

on whether fungivorous mesofauna feeds on saprophytic, mycorrhizal or<br />

pathogenic species. Since decomposition of litter materials often is limited<br />

by nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, saprophytic fungi probably<br />

compete with mycorrhiza for mineral nutrients. An important mechanism<br />

by which fungal grazers modify plant growth is, therefore, selective grazing<br />

on either saprophytic or mycorrhizal fungi. For arbuscular mycorrhizal<br />

plants, there is increasing evidence that beneficial effects of fungal grazers<br />

inpartareduetoselectivegrazingonsaprophyticfungi,therebyfavoring<br />

mycorrhiza. Although it is still difficult to define the explicit effects of the<br />

different faunal groups on decomposition processes, nutrient cycling and<br />

plant growth, our knowledge has advanced considerably. New methodological<br />

developments including molecular and stable isotope techniques<br />

provide the opportunity to analyse the complex interactions between microorganisms<br />

and their micro- and mesofauna grazers in unprecedented<br />

detail, promising fundamental progress in the near future.<br />

<strong>References</strong><br />

Agren GI, Bosatta E (1996) Quality: a bridge between theory and experiment in soil organic<br />

matter studies. Oikos 76:522–528<br />

Allen-Morley CR, Coleman DC (1989) Resilience of soil biota in various food webs to freezing<br />

perturbations. Ecology 70:1124–1141<br />

Alphei J, Bonkowski M, Scheu S (1996) Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere<br />

of Hordelymus europaeus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms<br />

and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 106:111–126<br />

Anderson JM (1975) The enigma of soil animal species diversity. In: Vanek J (ed) Progress<br />

in soil zoology. Academia Prague, Prague, pp 51–58<br />

Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1998) Plant growth-regulating substances in the rhizosphere:<br />

microbial production and functions. Adv Agron 62:45–151<br />

Babel U, Vogel H-J (1989) An evaluation of the activity of Enchytraeidae and Collembola by<br />

soil thin sections. Pedobiologia 33:167–172<br />

Bardgett RD, Keiller S, Cook R, Gilburn AS (1998) Dynamic interactions between soil animals<br />

and microorganisms in upland grassland soils amended with sheep dung: a microcosm<br />

experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 30:531–539<br />

BareaJM,NavarroE,MontoyaE(1976)Productionofplantgrowthregulatorsbyrhizosphere<br />

phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 40:129–134<br />

Beare MH, Parmelle RW, Hendrix PF, Cheng W, Coleman DC, Crossley DA Jr (1992) Microbial<br />

and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in<br />

agroecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:569–591

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!