13.07.2015 Views

child care in cook county - Illinois Action for Children

child care in cook county - Illinois Action for Children

child care in cook county - Illinois Action for Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>cook</strong> <strong>county</strong>:elements of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>supply and demand2010


2010<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>cook</strong> <strong>county</strong>:elements of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supply and demandFY 2009 (July 1, 2008–June 30, 2009)an ill<strong>in</strong>ois action <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren research report funded <strong>in</strong>part by the ill<strong>in</strong>ois department of human services4753 N. Broadway, Suite 1200, Chicago IL 60640(312) 823-1100 • www.act<strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong>ren.org


ContentsExecutive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Introduction: Families and Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Section I. Family Dilemma: Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6A. The Cost of Child Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6B. Trends <strong>in</strong> Child Care Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7C. What Percent of Income is Reasonable to Spend on Child Care? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8D. Help<strong>in</strong>g Parents Meet the Cost of Child Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8E. Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dability with Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9F. The Use of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Section II. Family Dilemma: Access to Available Child Care Slots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14A. Child Care Providers and Slots <strong>in</strong> Cook County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14B. Where are the Providers and Slots? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15C. Center Slots by Child Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19D. Referrals Given to Parents <strong>in</strong> 2009 by Child Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Section III. Family Dilemma: F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Child Care that Matches the Family’s Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21A. Providers Offer<strong>in</strong>g Child Care Dur<strong>in</strong>g Non-Traditional Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21B. Referrals Given to Parents <strong>in</strong> Need of Non-Traditional Hours of Child Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Section IV. Family Dilemma: F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the Right Provider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23A. What Do <strong>Children</strong> Need? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23B. Special Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23C. Language Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Section V. Public Dilemma: Who Needs Child Care? Who Needs Support? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25A. Child Population, Poverty and Low Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25B. <strong>Children</strong> With All Work<strong>in</strong>g Parents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26C. <strong>Children</strong> Eligible For but Without Child Care Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Section VI. Child Care Choices of Cook County Families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31Footnotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33AppendicesAppendix 1: The Six Cook County Regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Appendix 2: The Demand <strong>for</strong> and Supply of Child Care—Basic Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Appendix 3: Sources <strong>for</strong> Data on Child Care Providers <strong>in</strong> Cook County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40© 2010 Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>iii


Executive SummaryF<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> has never beeneasy—our reports <strong>in</strong> previous years,as well as this one, have outl<strong>in</strong>ed theissue <strong>in</strong> great detail. However, <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> has taken on an even moreimportant and complex role <strong>in</strong> thelives of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois’ families as Ill<strong>in</strong>ois facesdramatic budgetary and economicchallenges.As such, it is important to look at boththe need <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> and the capacityof <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> available <strong>in</strong> Cook County.<strong>Children</strong> of work<strong>in</strong>g parents spend asignificant percentage of each daywith a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider; as a result,a parent’s choice of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providersis undoubtedly one of the mostimportant decisions they will make.For myriad reasons <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g but notlimited to: <strong>in</strong>sufficient capacity, highcost of <strong>care</strong> and provider schedulesthat do not match a parent’s work<strong>in</strong>ghours, many <strong>child</strong>ren end up with theprovider their parent(s) can f<strong>in</strong>d giventhose limitations rather than the highestquality <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> available.In 2009, the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> picture <strong>for</strong> families<strong>in</strong> Cook County looked like this:• A family earn<strong>in</strong>g $46,069—the 2008Chicago median family <strong>in</strong>come—would pay anywhere from 15 percent(<strong>for</strong> licensed home <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant or toddler) to 23 percent(<strong>for</strong> center-based <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chicago<strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant) of a Chicago family’stypical <strong>in</strong>come. This makes <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> cost-prohibitive <strong>in</strong> many cases.• The cost of center <strong>care</strong> is ris<strong>in</strong>g atan alarm<strong>in</strong>g rate—much higherthan consumer prices are ris<strong>in</strong>gnationally. While consumer priceshave risen 25 percent s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000,center rates have seen sharp<strong>in</strong>creases of anywhere from 32percent to 61 percent over thatsame time period. The only exceptionto this is <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant and toddler<strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chicago, which has onlyseen costs rise by about 20 percents<strong>in</strong>ce 2000.• As a comparison, the cost of <strong>in</strong>fantand toddler <strong>care</strong> exceeds the costof college tuition and fees. At$9,452, these higher educationcosts would cover only 90 percentof <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> costs <strong>in</strong> Chicago andjust 79 percent of <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong>suburban Cook County centers.• For another cost comparison, thecost of <strong>in</strong>fant and toddler <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong><strong>in</strong> Chicago centers is equally asexpensive as the cost (<strong>in</strong> 2008) oftotal rent <strong>in</strong> a year <strong>for</strong> the typicalChicago family: $10,356.• Traditionally the fastest ris<strong>in</strong>g costsare those of be<strong>for</strong>e- and after-school<strong>care</strong>. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, those priceshave <strong>in</strong>creased by 61 percent to65 percent <strong>in</strong> Chicago centers andhomes, and 45 percent to 46 percent<strong>in</strong> suburban centers and homes.• Unlicensed home <strong>care</strong>—mostoften provided by a family member,friend, or neighbor—is still the onlyaf<strong>for</strong>dable option <strong>for</strong> many families,particularly <strong>in</strong> this difficult economicclimate. This is often the onlyoption <strong>for</strong> middle-<strong>in</strong>come familieswho are either already earn<strong>in</strong>gtoo much <strong>in</strong>come to be eligible <strong>for</strong>Child Care Assistance or, <strong>for</strong> avariety of reasons, are no longereligible <strong>for</strong> assistance.• With a total of 4,503 slots, fewer<strong>care</strong> options exist <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants thanany other age group under schoolage; a similar situation exists <strong>for</strong>toddlers. It is costly <strong>for</strong> centers toprovide <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> these age groups,lead<strong>in</strong>g many families with <strong>in</strong>fantsand toddlers to look to family <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> homes <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong>.• While the number of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers offer<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>g or weekendhours is still scarce, the percentagehas <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> recentyears. Five (5) percent of <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> centers offer even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>,a noticeable <strong>in</strong>crease from the 3percent that offered <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2007.• Relatively low pay makes it very difficult<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers to reta<strong>in</strong>high-quality staff, particularly teachers.• Only 34 percent of families surveyedthat had no <strong>child</strong>ren with specialneeds reported that they had problemsf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> CookCounty, as compared with 45 percentof families that had a <strong>child</strong> withspecial needs. Additionally, only 38percent of families with <strong>child</strong>renwith special needs said they hadfound <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> by the time of thesurvey, compared to 44 percent offamilies without <strong>child</strong>ren with specialneeds. Families that had <strong>child</strong>renwith special needs were morelikely to still be undecided abouttheir <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> arrangement.• In 2009, 10 percent of familiesus<strong>in</strong>g Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>’sreferral service sought a providerwho could speak a language otherthan English, the predom<strong>in</strong>ant languagerequested be<strong>in</strong>g Spanish.• Of the providers who are on the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Referral database,19 percent of licensed homeproviders reported they fluentlyspeak a language other than English,while 43 percent of centers said theyhave a staff member who speaks alanguage other than English.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois is at a critical moment whenit comes to support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> andearly education. State budget shortfallsthreaten the ability of the ChildCare Assistance Program (CCAP),Preschool <strong>for</strong> All, and other statefundedearly education and afterschoolprograms to serve Ill<strong>in</strong>oisfamilies. It is our <strong>in</strong>tention, throughthe data conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this report, todemonstrate that <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is notsometh<strong>in</strong>g that should be cut from theState’s budget or its human priorities.1


I N T R O D U C T I O NFamilies and Child Care<strong>in</strong> Cook CountyMore than one million <strong>child</strong>renunder the age of 13 live <strong>in</strong> CookCounty. A large proportion, andperhaps a majority, of these <strong>child</strong>renreceive regular <strong>care</strong> from someoneother than their parents or guardians:from another relative, a friendor neighbor, a family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>home, a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center, or apark district or other after-schoolprogram.EXAMINING COOK COUNTY CHILD CARE BY REGIONThroughout this Report we divide Cook County <strong>in</strong>to six regions to show howgeographic differences can affect parents’ success <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.CHICAGOSUBURBAN COOK COUNTY1) North and Northwest 4) North and Northwest2) Central and West 5) West3) South and Southwest 6) South and SouthwestSee Appendix 1 <strong>for</strong> more detailed def<strong>in</strong>itions of these regions.This 2010 Report of Child Care<strong>in</strong> Cook County exam<strong>in</strong>es the availabilityof <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> to families <strong>in</strong>different parts of Cook County.We present the different sett<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong> which <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> takes place,the number of <strong>child</strong>ren that can beserved <strong>in</strong> each type of <strong>care</strong>, andthe fees that parents pay to differenttypes of providers. We report theexperiences of some parents whoseek referrals to <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providersand exam<strong>in</strong>e the dilemmasthey face <strong>in</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g a providerand the compromises they makeas a result.Chicago and Suburban Cook RegionsNorth & Northwest Suburban CookNorth & Northwest ChicagoCentral & West ChicagoA NOTE ON SUPPLYAND DEMANDWest Suburban CookWhile we subtitle this report“Elements of Child Care Supply andDemand,” we want to caution readersthat the factors that determ<strong>in</strong>ethe supply of and demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> are numerous and complex.We cannot simply compare thenumber of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> slots and thenumber of <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> need of <strong>care</strong>.Appendix 2 provides a detaileddiscussion of the various elementsthat <strong>in</strong>fluence both <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supplyand demand and expla<strong>in</strong>s why anSouth & Southwest ChicagoSouth & Southwest Suburban Cook3


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook Countyeffective analysis of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supplyand demand can be so complex.WHAT TYPES OF CHILDCARE ARE AVAILABLE?A family’s success <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g quality<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is based on many factors<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the family’s location, a<strong>child</strong>’s age, the hours of <strong>care</strong> needed,the amount the family can af<strong>for</strong>dto pay, a <strong>child</strong>’s specific needs, andthe parent’s particular preferences.Assum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> a moment that familiescan access all types of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>,let’s look at the available options.First, many families only useparental <strong>care</strong>. Either one parentstays home to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> the <strong>child</strong>ren,or both parents stagger their sched -ules so one can <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> the <strong>child</strong>renwhile the other works, goes to school,or fulfills other responsibilities.Parents who need or want to lookbeyond parental <strong>care</strong> may f<strong>in</strong>d home<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> an appeal<strong>in</strong>g option.They may take their <strong>child</strong> to thehome of someone they know well,such as a family member, closefriend or neighbor, or someone theydiscovered through word-of-mouthor through a referral service. Theymay also choose a <strong>care</strong>giver whocan provide <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>child</strong>’shome, as a nanny does.Many home-based <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers, especially those who provide<strong>care</strong> as an on-go<strong>in</strong>g profession,choose to become licensed. Thismeans the <strong>care</strong> provided <strong>in</strong> theirhomes is regulated by the Ill<strong>in</strong>oisDepartment of <strong>Children</strong> and FamilyServices (DCFS) as well as theirlocal licens<strong>in</strong>g agency, if one exists.Throughout this report, we refer tothese <strong>care</strong>givers as licensed homeproviders, and we refer to thosewithout licenses as license-exempthome providers or family, friend, orneighbor <strong>care</strong> (see the glossary <strong>for</strong>detailed def<strong>in</strong>itions of these terms).License-exempt home <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>can be provided <strong>in</strong> the home of the<strong>care</strong>giver or the <strong>child</strong>.Parents also have the option of tak<strong>in</strong>gtheir <strong>child</strong> to a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center.While most of these facilities arelicensed by DCFS, centers suchas those based <strong>in</strong> school or affiliatedwith religious groups are exemptfrom be<strong>in</strong>g licensed. Center <strong>care</strong>may <strong>in</strong>clude all or part-day <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> programs, be<strong>for</strong>e- and afterschoolprograms (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thoseprovided by park districts andYMCAs), and full-day summerprograms <strong>for</strong> school-age <strong>child</strong>ren.Parents who may not need full-time<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> but wish to prepare their3- or 4-year-old <strong>child</strong> <strong>for</strong> k<strong>in</strong>dergartenmay consider a part-dayor part-week preschool program.These programs <strong>in</strong>clude private,tuition-based programs as well asfree public programs such as HeadStart and Preschool <strong>for</strong> All (dataon public and private preschoolprograms are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> thisreport).HOW DO FAMILIES FINDCHILD CARE?Families seek <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> by ask<strong>in</strong>grelatives or friends <strong>for</strong> referrals,look<strong>in</strong>g at notices and advertisements,and visit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers<strong>in</strong> their communities. The State ofIll<strong>in</strong>ois offers a resource <strong>for</strong> families<strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m of a referral service—Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istersthis service <strong>for</strong> families <strong>in</strong> CookCounty through its Resource andReferral Program, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g adatabase of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providerswho register voluntarily to bereferred to parents. Child <strong>care</strong>providers supply detailed <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mationabout their programs so thatreferral consultants can help parentsf<strong>in</strong>d providers that match theirneeds and preferences. Referralconsultants help educate parents onwhat constitutes quality <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>so parents are more equipped toevaluate the programs they visit.WHAT IS THE TYPICALFAMILY EXPERIENCE?While many parents and guardiansare quite satisfied with the <strong>care</strong> their<strong>child</strong>ren receive, many others f<strong>in</strong>dthe process of search<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> anddecid<strong>in</strong>g on a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providerstressful. These parents frequentlyexperience frustration f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g theright <strong>care</strong> at the right hours, rightlocation, and right price.Families search <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> undersuch vastly different circumstancesthat no one family’s story can beconsidered wholly representative.However, we will <strong>in</strong>troduce several“typical families” <strong>in</strong> an ef<strong>for</strong>t toexplore the complex and oftendifficult decisions Cook Countyfamilies face <strong>in</strong> arrang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.4


IntroductionGABRIELLE AND SHAWN HARRISAND THEIR 10-MONTH AND21-MONTH OLD DAUGHTERSCANDACE THOMAS AND HER2-YEAR-OLD, 4-YEAR-OLD,AND 8-YEAR-OLDALBERTA REYES AND HERTHREE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTERGabrielle and Shawn together earned$89,400 <strong>in</strong> 2009, more than thetypical family <strong>in</strong> Cook County, and toomuch to be eligible <strong>for</strong> the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ChildCare Assistance Program (CCAP).The <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center they would liketo use would charge them $1,834per month <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant and a toddler,or $22,000 annually, although the <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> tax credit would reduce that tojust $20,800—23 percent of their<strong>in</strong>come. S<strong>in</strong>ce pay<strong>in</strong>g this amountwould stretch their budget, they mustdecide whether to settle <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>somewhere other than the center, orwhether Gabrielle should work a longweekend shift of three overnights ata hospital so she can be home withher <strong>child</strong>ren dur<strong>in</strong>g most weekdayswhile Shawn works. Her sister-<strong>in</strong>-lawhas offered to help with the <strong>child</strong>renwhen needed and has asked if they,<strong>in</strong> turn, could help <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> her <strong>child</strong>renwhen she works.Candace’s three <strong>child</strong>ren are <strong>in</strong> <strong>care</strong>with an <strong>in</strong>expensive licensed family<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider. Candace works <strong>for</strong>a large retailer that recently gave hera promotion and sizeable raise. Thislifted her <strong>in</strong>come to an annual salaryof $44,800, mak<strong>in</strong>g her no longereligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP. Candace is nowstruggl<strong>in</strong>g to af<strong>for</strong>d her <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> butis reluctant to move her <strong>child</strong>ren toan even less expensive provider s<strong>in</strong>ceshe and her <strong>child</strong>ren are very happywith their current <strong>care</strong>giver. She hopes<strong>for</strong> another promotion <strong>in</strong> a few monthsto help her with her higher <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>expenses. If that doesn’t happen,she is consider<strong>in</strong>g ask<strong>in</strong>g her employerto return her to her old position so shecan reapply <strong>for</strong> Child Care Assistance.Alberta is a s<strong>in</strong>gle mother who worksat a distribution center four nightsper week, although sometimes she issent home when bus<strong>in</strong>ess is slow.She earns $7.85 per hour andreceives $200 each month <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong>support, giv<strong>in</strong>g her a total <strong>in</strong>come of$16,138 <strong>in</strong> 2009. Alberta is <strong>in</strong> needof overnight <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> between 6 p.m.and 6 a.m. Fortunately, her mother isavailable to watch her daughter <strong>in</strong> themorn<strong>in</strong>g so she can sleep.These examples do not represent actual families but composites of typical <strong>in</strong>comes and work schedules <strong>for</strong> families <strong>in</strong> Cook County.5


I. Family Dilemma:Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dabilityA.THE COST OF CHILD CAREEach year, the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> Chil -dren Resource and Referral Programasks providers to report the ratesthey charge parents. Tables I-1 andI-2 present the average market ratesthat 729 <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers and2,503 homes respectively charge <strong>in</strong>the six regions of Cook County.Centers average between $138 and$280 each week to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>renunder age six, while home providerscharge an average of $119 to $202weekly, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon age andregion. The last rows of both tablesshow the rates that the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ChildCare Assistance Program (CCAP)reimbursed Cook County providers<strong>in</strong> 2009. We will discuss these ratesfurther <strong>in</strong> Section I-D.Tables I-1 and I-2 <strong>in</strong>dicate sharpdif ferences <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> ratesrelative to the region <strong>in</strong> which the<strong>care</strong> occurs and the age of the<strong>child</strong>. In <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, it is well-knownthat the younger the <strong>child</strong>ren, themore expensive it is to provide their<strong>care</strong>, largely due to the additional<strong>care</strong> and supervision that young<strong>child</strong>ren need.As <strong>in</strong> previous years, the Southand Southwestern regions of bothChicago and suburban CookCounty generally have the lowestrates. These regions also havelower average <strong>in</strong>comes and highernumbers of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> pro viders.[See Section II.] Private and publicsector entrepreneurs have been relativelysuccessful <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g needed<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> capacity <strong>in</strong> many of thesecommunities, and this more plentifulsupply may serve to keep theiraverage rates lower.Table I-1. Child Care Center Full-Time Weekly RatesFY2009Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program2- 5- Be<strong>for</strong>e Schoolyear- 3- to 4- year- & After Age:Infant Toddler old year-old old to K School SummerCook Co. Average $229 $213 $185 $166 $161 $112 $148N & NW Chicago $238 $212 $185 $164 $158 $110 $145C & W Chicago $242 $229 $196 $172 $169 $114 $141S & SW Chicago $187 $181 $158 $140 $138 $99 $120N & NW Suburban Cook $280 $257 $228 $208 $201 $129 $197West Suburban Cook $228 $206 $187 $166 $162 $101 $150S & SW Suburban Cook $201 $190 $167 $150 $144 $109 $140IDHS Full TimePayment Rates$202.50 $171 $142.50 $71.25 $142.505 hrs./dayTable I-2. Licensed Child Care Home Full-Time Weekly RatesFY2009Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program2- 5- Be<strong>for</strong>e Schoolyear- 3- to 4- year- & After Age:Infant Toddler old year-old old to K School SummerCook Co. Average $144 $141 $137 $132 $127 $100 $121N & NW Chicago $164 $160 $156 $149 $144 $116 $147C & W Chicago $137 $133 $128 $123 $120 $100 $117S & SW Chicago $134 $131 $127 $122 $119 $97 $115N & NW Suburban Cook $202 $197 $194 $191 $184 $123 $167West Suburban Cook $150 $145 $142 $139 $134 $102 $127S & SW Suburban Cook $138 $135 $130 $125 $120 $94 $115IDHS Full TimePayment RatesWe f<strong>in</strong>d similarly low rates <strong>in</strong> the<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes of the West andCentral Chicago region, reflect<strong>in</strong>gthat the majority of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes<strong>in</strong> this region are on Chicago’s westside, one of the poorest areas <strong>in</strong> the<strong>county</strong>. Child <strong>care</strong> center rates <strong>in</strong>this region are higher, however, as$133 $128 $120 $60.00 $120.005 hrs./daythe centers are more evenly distributedbetween the poorer westernportion of the region and the wealthiercentral portion.The North and Northwest Suburbanregion stands out <strong>for</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g thehighest rates <strong>for</strong> both centers andhomes of all six regions.6


B.TRENDS IN CHILDCARE RATESLike most expenses, <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> coststend to rise every year. But the costof center <strong>care</strong> has risen more rapidlythan consumer prices nationally.Table I-3 presents the aggregaterate <strong>in</strong>creases of centers and family<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes <strong>for</strong> Chicago andsuburban Cook County. The dollarcolumns show the most recent rates<strong>for</strong> each age group. Next to eachrate is a column that presents thepercent <strong>in</strong>crease over the n<strong>in</strong>e yearsfrom June 2000 to June 2009.Increases ranged from 13 percent to65 percent. Over the same periodof time, all consumer prices roseabout 25 percent nationally. 1 Whilemost licensed home rates <strong>in</strong>creasednear or below this average <strong>in</strong>flationrate, center rates <strong>for</strong> almost all agegroups far exceeded it.It appears, then, that Cook Countyparents—or those parents who canaf<strong>for</strong>d to pay <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong>—have a demand<strong>for</strong> center <strong>care</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g faster thantheir demand <strong>for</strong> home <strong>care</strong>, especially<strong>in</strong> the ages above toddler.Two important exceptions wherehome rates have outpaced those ofcenters are <strong>in</strong>fant and toddler <strong>care</strong><strong>in</strong> Chicago and be<strong>for</strong>e- and afterschool<strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> both Chicago andsuburban Cook County.While suburban <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs moreon average than <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chicago,Chicago has experienced more rapidrate <strong>in</strong>creases over the last n<strong>in</strong>eyears than has suburban CookCounty. This is the case <strong>for</strong> both centerand home <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> all age groupsexcept <strong>in</strong>fant and toddler center <strong>care</strong>.Across age groups, the slowest ris<strong>in</strong>gcenter costs were that of <strong>in</strong>fant andtoddler <strong>care</strong>, particularly <strong>in</strong> Chicagocenters where the average cost of<strong>in</strong>fant and toddler <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased 20percent and 21 percent respectivelyover the last n<strong>in</strong>e years. Still, <strong>in</strong>fantand toddler <strong>care</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s the mostexpensive of all age groups.The fastest-ris<strong>in</strong>g costs were those ofbe<strong>for</strong>e- and after-school <strong>care</strong>, ris<strong>in</strong>gmore quickly <strong>in</strong> Chicago than <strong>in</strong> thesuburbs. The average cost of be<strong>for</strong>eandafter-school <strong>care</strong> rose by 65percent <strong>in</strong> Chicago licensed homesand 61 percent <strong>in</strong> Chicago centers.C.WHAT PERCENT OFINCOME IS REASONABLETO SPEND ON CHILD CARE?The numbers are clear; <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>is an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly burdensomef<strong>in</strong>ancial responsibility <strong>for</strong> families.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the U.S. Census, thetypical (median) <strong>in</strong>come <strong>for</strong> familieswith <strong>child</strong>ren under 18 <strong>in</strong> CookCounty was $61,306 be<strong>for</strong>e taxes<strong>in</strong> 2008, and even lower <strong>for</strong> Chicagofamilies at $46,069. 2 Care <strong>for</strong> one<strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong> a Chicago <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center,at an average cost of $210 perweek, or $10,500 over a fifty-weekyear, costs 23 percent of a typicalChicago family’s pre-tax <strong>in</strong>come.At $10,000 per year, toddler <strong>care</strong>takes up 22 percent. Licensed home<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant or toddler is moreaf<strong>for</strong>dable at $6,800 to $6,950 peryear, but even this is 15 percent ofa Chicago family’s <strong>in</strong>come.Table I-3. 2009 Average Weekly Market Rates, and Rate Increases S<strong>in</strong>ce 2000Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program. Rounded to the nearest dollar or percent.Percent Percent Percent PercentGrowth Growth Suburban Growth Suburban GrowthChicago S<strong>in</strong>ce Chicago S<strong>in</strong>ce Cook S<strong>in</strong>ce Cook S<strong>in</strong>ceAge Centers 2000 Homes 2000 Centers 2000 Homes 2000Infant $210 20% $139 26% $239 32% $154 17%Toddler $200 21% $136 28% $220 34% $150 18%2-year-old $173 52% $132 27% $196 41% $146 17%3- to 4-year-old $153 44% $127 27% $176 39% $142 16%5-year-old $150 42% $123 26% $171 36% $136 13%Be<strong>for</strong>e & After School $105 61% $100 65% $116 45% $100 46%School-Age Summer $131 51% $120 39% $160 34% $125 26%Percent growth <strong>in</strong> consumer prices nationwide s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000: 25%7


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyWHICH FAMILIES ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVECHILD CARE ASSISTANCE?GABRIELLE AND SHAWN HARRIS:WORKING PARENTS WITH ANINFANT AND A TODDLER.INCOME IS $89,400 A YEAR.The maximum <strong>in</strong>come a family of fourcan earn to be eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP is$42,408 per year. Gabrielle andShawn earn double this amount andare not eligible. Nevertheless , theyfeel they cannot af<strong>for</strong>d to pay <strong>for</strong>quality <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.CANDACE THOMAS: WORKINGMOTHER WITH THREE CHILDREN.INCOME IS $44,800 A YEAR.Candace’s <strong>in</strong>come exceeds theCCAP limit of $42,408 <strong>for</strong> a familyof four. She is not eligible <strong>for</strong> theassistance unless she lowers her<strong>in</strong>come by $200 a month.The median rent <strong>in</strong> Chicago <strong>in</strong>2008 was $10,356, accord<strong>in</strong>g tothe same U.S. Census report. Bythis measure, <strong>in</strong>fant and toddler<strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chicago centers is justas expensive as rent <strong>for</strong> the typicalChicago family. Similarly, <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>is more expensive than averagefees and tuition at State collegesand universities <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois. At$9,452, these average fees andtuition cover 90 percent of the costof <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chicago centersand only 79 percent of the costof <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> suburban Cookcenters. 3Is 15 percent or 23 percent of afamily’s <strong>in</strong>come too much to pay <strong>for</strong>an <strong>in</strong>fant’s <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>? Is 30 percenttoo much to pay <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant and aALBERTA REYES: WORKINGMOTHER WITH A PRESCHOOLER.INCOME IS $16,138 A YEAR.Alberta is eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP. Thisopens more options to her, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gthe more costly <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers or licensed family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>homes. Alberta will need to pay aco-payment of $25 per week. If shechooses a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider whocharges more than what CCAP pays,she may have to make additionalpayments. If she f<strong>in</strong>ds that her copaymentis too high, she may look <strong>for</strong>a provider, perhaps a relative orfriend, will<strong>in</strong>g to waive part of her copaymentor to be more flexible withwhen she has to make her copayments.toddler? What is the proper proportionbetween <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> expensesand <strong>in</strong>come? There is no generallyaccepted level that everyone agreesis the “proper” percentage to pay.Most national studies s<strong>in</strong>ce the1990s have found that averagetwo-parent middle-<strong>in</strong>come familiespaid between 6 percent and 10percent of their <strong>in</strong>come <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>. 4 If we pick the higher 10 percentlevel as a rule of thumb <strong>for</strong>af<strong>for</strong>dability, a family <strong>in</strong> 2009 wouldhave to earn $105,000 <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant<strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Chicago <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centerto be af<strong>for</strong>dable. This family wouldneed to earn $181,800 to placean <strong>in</strong>fant and a four-year-old <strong>in</strong> aChicago center and keep their <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> costs with<strong>in</strong> 10 percent oftheir <strong>in</strong>come. To meet the 10 percentrule of thumb <strong>in</strong> suburbanCook County centers, a familypay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> would requirean <strong>in</strong>come of $119,600, while center<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> both an <strong>in</strong>fant and afour-year-old would require an<strong>in</strong>come of $207,700. 5D.HELPING PARENTSMEET THE COSTOF CHILD CARESeveral government-fundedresources exist to help familiespay <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs, and<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers themselvesoften have tuition policies to assistfamilies who struggle to pay.The ma<strong>in</strong> source of f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistanceto help Ill<strong>in</strong>ois parents with<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs is the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ChildCare Assistance Program (CCAP).A family eligible <strong>for</strong> this programchooses a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider andthe State reimburses this provider<strong>for</strong> his or her services. Parentspay a portion of the cost of <strong>care</strong>,a co-payment, which depends onthe family’s size and <strong>in</strong>come. CCAPis available to families that earn ator below 200 percent of the federalpoverty level, or $42,408 <strong>for</strong> afamily of four <strong>in</strong> 2009. 6 Parentsmust work or participate <strong>in</strong> anapproved school or tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programto be eligible. CCAP is primarilya voucher system adm<strong>in</strong>istered <strong>in</strong>Cook County by Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>Children</strong> under contract with theIll<strong>in</strong>ois Department of HumanServices (IDHS). Some <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers, however, have directcontracts with IDHS to serve familieseligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP.8


I. Family Dilemma: Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dabilityWHAT TYPES OF CHILD CARE CAN FAMILIES AFFORD?Assum<strong>in</strong>g “af<strong>for</strong>dable” means pay<strong>in</strong>g no more than 10 percent of the family <strong>in</strong>come on <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, here are thetypes of <strong>care</strong> our families can af<strong>for</strong>d based on the average cost of <strong>care</strong>.GABRIELLE AND SHAWN HARRIS:WORKING PARENTS WITH INFANTAND TODDLER. INCOME IS$89,400 PER YEAR.S<strong>in</strong>ce this couple is not eligible <strong>for</strong>CCAP, their options are limited. Budget -<strong>in</strong>g 10 percent of their <strong>in</strong>come, theycould pay as much as $172 per weektoward <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> or $745 per month.With that budget, few types of <strong>care</strong> areavailable to them. The lowest averagecomb<strong>in</strong>ed price of regulated <strong>in</strong>fant andtoddler <strong>care</strong>, $265 weekly, occurs <strong>in</strong>licensed family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes <strong>in</strong>South and Southwest Chicago. At about15 percent of their <strong>in</strong>come, even this<strong>care</strong> would be unaf<strong>for</strong>dable by the10 percent standard.Af<strong>for</strong>dable options <strong>for</strong> this couple<strong>in</strong>clude cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to stagger their workschedules so that they can <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> their<strong>child</strong>ren themselves (with the help ofShawn’s sister) and look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong><strong>in</strong>expensive family, friend or neighbor<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.CANDACE THOMAS: WORKINGMOTHER WITH THREE CHILDREN.INCOME IS $44,800 PER YEAR.Candace earns just $200 a monthabove the annual cut off <strong>for</strong> CCAP.She can spend about $86 per week tostay with<strong>in</strong> 10 percent of her <strong>in</strong>come.But if she wants to use center <strong>care</strong>,that amount would not pay <strong>for</strong> any oneof her <strong>child</strong>ren, not even less expensivebe<strong>for</strong>e-and-after-school <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> hereight-year old, much less all three<strong>child</strong>ren.Like the family above, family, friend,or neighbor <strong>care</strong> is the only type of <strong>care</strong>that might cost Candace less than 10percent of her <strong>in</strong>come. Without CCAP,the licensed family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> that shecurrently uses costs her 28 percent ofher <strong>in</strong>come, not a susta<strong>in</strong> able option.(A more typical rate <strong>for</strong> licensed home<strong>care</strong> would take 40 percent of her<strong>in</strong>come.) If a raise does not comethrough, she might try to reduce her<strong>in</strong>come back below the eligibility cutoffso that she can receive CCAP support.ALBERTA REYES: WORKINGMOTHER WITH A PRESCHOOLER.INCOME IS $16,138 PER YEAR.To stay with<strong>in</strong> 10 percent of her <strong>in</strong>come,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> support, Alberta would beable to pay as much as $31 per weekon <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. If she receives CCAPsupport, <strong>for</strong> which she is eligible, shewill have to pay $25 per week <strong>for</strong> herco-payment. If Alberta is able to f<strong>in</strong>d a<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider who accepts CCAPpayments and who expects noth<strong>in</strong>gbeyond her co-payment, Alberta willhave access to both center and licensedhome <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the rates paid by theCCAP tend to be less than the averagerates charged by centers and licensedhome providers, these providers mightask Alberta to pay the difference. In thiscase, Alberta would be priced out ofaverage-priced center <strong>care</strong> except <strong>in</strong> theSouth and Southwest Chicago region.Licensed home <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Central andWest Chicago region and the South andSouthwest Chicago and suburbanregions would be af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong> her. Inall other regions, she would only be ableto af<strong>for</strong>d family, friend or neighbor <strong>care</strong>.Another state program that provides<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance, but to a morespecific population, is the Depart mentof <strong>Children</strong> and Family Services (DCFS).DCFS provides <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> vouchersprimarily to families with foster <strong>child</strong>ren.Beyond government-funded programs,a number of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers offertheir own <strong>for</strong>ms of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance.These <strong>in</strong>clude discounts <strong>for</strong>parents with more than one <strong>child</strong> <strong>in</strong>their <strong>care</strong>, slid<strong>in</strong>g scale fees based ona family’s ability to pay, scholarships,and negotiable rates. Some providerswill accept the CCAP reimbursementas full payment even though theamount they receive through the programmay be less than what theproviders typically charge.Both the federal and Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>in</strong>cometax programs offer some relief<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m ofmodest dependent <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> taxcredits. These credits allow familiesto reduce their <strong>in</strong>come tax bill by afraction of their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> expenses.9


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyFigure I-1. What Families Need to Spend on Child CareFamily Size of 4, 1 Child <strong>in</strong> Care, June 2009Percent of Family Income28%26%24%22%20%18%16%14%12%10%8%6%4%2%0%$10,000$15,000E.CHILD CARE AFFORDABILITYWITH ASSISTANCECCAP was designed to help work<strong>in</strong>gparents af<strong>for</strong>d <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Child <strong>care</strong>advocates and policy makers arekeenly <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> whether the programenables low-<strong>in</strong>come parents <strong>in</strong>Cook County to af<strong>for</strong>d quality <strong>care</strong>.While Tables I-1 and I-2 above do notanswer this question completely, theydo suggest an answer. The last row ofeach table presents how much CCAPpays to Cook County providers <strong>for</strong> differenttypes of <strong>care</strong>. Rate <strong>in</strong>creasesover the last two years have broughtthe amount CCAP pays to providers<strong>in</strong> lower-cost regions (South andSouth west Chicago and suburbs, andWest and Central Chicago <strong>in</strong> the caseof licensed homes) more <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e withthe average amounts providers actuallycharge parents. In the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gregions, however, CCAP rates fallbelow the average rates that centersand homes charge.$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000$45,000$50,000TYPE OF CARE Center <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant Center <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>child</strong> age 2 Licensed home <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>child</strong> age 2 Neighbor <strong>care</strong>$55,000Family IncomeUnder the CCAP, parents must makea co-payment. They pay the provider apart of the CCAP rate listed <strong>in</strong> TablesI-1 and I-2 depend<strong>in</strong>g on the family’s<strong>in</strong>come. A family of three must pay atleast $1.00 per week and as much as$61.00 per week <strong>for</strong> one <strong>child</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>care</strong>(or up to $104 <strong>for</strong> two <strong>child</strong>ren). Insome cases, this co-payment can beas high as 16 percent of a family’s<strong>in</strong>come. In 2008, legislation to capCCAP co-payments at 10 percent offamily <strong>in</strong>come was <strong>in</strong>troduced but didnot become law. In the fall of 2009,co-payments have been temporarilycut as part of the American Recoveryand Re<strong>in</strong>vestment Act (ARRA) tocounter the economic recession.S<strong>in</strong>ce the average provider <strong>in</strong> CookCounty charges more than what theAssistance Program will pay, parentsmay also have to pay that difference <strong>in</strong>addition to their co-payments or conv<strong>in</strong>cetheir providers to accept a lowerpayment than they normally charge.$60,000$65,000$70,000$75,000$80,000$85,000$90,000$95,000$100,000$105,000$110,000$115,000It is fair to conclude that even afterreceiv<strong>in</strong>g CCAP support, a family’schoice of provider and the quality ofoptions can still be seriously limited.While we have hearsay evidencethat some providers do work withfamilies to determ<strong>in</strong>e an acceptablerate, many providers cannot af<strong>for</strong>d toreduce their rates to meet a family’sability to pay.Figure I-1 develops the story ofCCAP and af<strong>for</strong>dability <strong>in</strong> moredetail, <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>for</strong> Cook County<strong>for</strong> a family of four. 7 It presents thecost of <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> just one <strong>child</strong> as apercentage of different family<strong>in</strong>comes rang<strong>in</strong>g from $10,000 to$115,000. The chart’s four l<strong>in</strong>esdenote cost, with the highest costl<strong>in</strong>e represent<strong>in</strong>g the high price ofcenter <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant and thelowest cost l<strong>in</strong>e represent<strong>in</strong>g themore af<strong>for</strong>dable price of family,friend or neighbor <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> an older<strong>child</strong>. The four k<strong>in</strong>ds of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>costs appear as percentages of10


I. Family Dilemma: Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dabilityFigure I-2. What Families Need to Spend on Infant Center CareChange from June 2005 to June 2009, Family Size of 428%26%24%22%20%18%16%14%12%10%8%6%4%2%0June 2005Percent of Family Income$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$34,584$40,000$45,000Family Income$50,000$55,000$60,000$65,000$70,000June 2009Median Family Income 2008:$61,306 (latest available)Median Family Income 2005:$54,719each <strong>in</strong>come level that is measuredon the horizontal axis. The chart isrealistic <strong>in</strong> the sense that it <strong>in</strong>cludesthe effect of receiv<strong>in</strong>g CCAP support,which is available to a familyof low <strong>in</strong>come if all present parentsare employed. 8Figure I-1 shows Cook Countyparents can pay less than five (5)percent of family <strong>in</strong>come (<strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>malneighbor <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>) and asmuch as 25 percent (<strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fantcenter <strong>care</strong>) <strong>for</strong> one <strong>child</strong>, depend<strong>in</strong>gon their level of <strong>in</strong>come, the ageof the <strong>child</strong> and type of <strong>care</strong> theyuse. Note that Figure I-1 buildsupon average rates of <strong>care</strong> such asthose <strong>in</strong> Tables I-1 and I-2. Someparents might have to pay a higherrate than the average, while otherswill pay below the average. Plac<strong>in</strong>gmore <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> <strong>care</strong>, moreover, willcost parents more.Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with a family with almostno <strong>in</strong>come on the left and mov<strong>in</strong>gup to a family <strong>in</strong>come of about$40,000, we see that a family offour would spend between 3 percentand 16 percent of its <strong>in</strong>come<strong>for</strong> full-time <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> one <strong>child</strong>,depend<strong>in</strong>g on the age of the <strong>child</strong>and type of <strong>care</strong>. It is CCAP alonethat makes it possible <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>to cost this little <strong>for</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g familieswith these low <strong>in</strong>comes. If thework<strong>in</strong>g family’s <strong>in</strong>come rises a littleabove $42,000, the family ceasesto be eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP and most<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs shoot up to a prohibitivelyhigh percentage of thefamily’s <strong>in</strong>come (from 15 percentto almost 26 percent). This isknown as the “cliff effect.”Only unregulated family, friend, andneighbor <strong>care</strong> changes little as apercentage of <strong>in</strong>come and rema<strong>in</strong>saf<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong> families earn<strong>in</strong>g justover $42,000. Consider the exampleof 10-percent-of-<strong>in</strong>come we usedearlier <strong>in</strong> this section to discussaf<strong>for</strong>dability. Once a family’s <strong>in</strong>comerises above $42,000 and the family11becomes <strong>in</strong>eligible <strong>for</strong> Child CareAssistance, it takes an <strong>in</strong>come of$68,300 be<strong>for</strong>e licensed home <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> a two-year-old returns to 10 percentof the family’s <strong>in</strong>come. It takesan <strong>in</strong>come of $114,680 be<strong>for</strong>e thecost of <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a center returnsto ten percent of the family’s <strong>in</strong>come.Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>for</strong> a family earn<strong>in</strong>g less than$68,300, only <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal family, friendor neighbor <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is af<strong>for</strong>dableat 10 percent of family <strong>in</strong>come.These higher <strong>in</strong>comes, needlessto say, are substantially above thetypical family <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.Trend <strong>in</strong> Af<strong>for</strong>dabilityOver the years, the State of Ill<strong>in</strong>oishas made a series of improvementsto CCAP, extend<strong>in</strong>g eligibility to abroader range of families and mak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> more af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong>many other families.Figure I-2 illustrates this. The dottedl<strong>in</strong>e shows the af<strong>for</strong>dability of <strong>child</strong>


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook County<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong> a center <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>in</strong> June 2005. It takes <strong>in</strong>to accountthe cost of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> and the valueof CCAP support at that time.First, look at the peaks of thel<strong>in</strong>es—the po<strong>in</strong>ts where <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>takes up the largest percentage ofa family’s <strong>in</strong>come. To the left of thepeak are families who are eligible<strong>for</strong> CCAP, and pay less of their<strong>in</strong>come <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>. To the rightare families who are not eligible andwho may pay a higher percentage.The peak moved to the right from2005 to 2009, to families with higher<strong>in</strong>comes. The shift of the peak to theright, to higher <strong>in</strong>comes, <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat families with somewhat higher<strong>in</strong>comes have become eligible <strong>for</strong>CCAP. That represents the expansionof CCAP eligibility.Next, notice that the 2009 l<strong>in</strong>e isgenerally below the 2005 l<strong>in</strong>e onthe left side of the peak, while it isabove the dotted l<strong>in</strong>e to the right ofthe peak. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that CCAPhas generally lowered the cost of<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> families who use assistance(those on the left of the 2009 peak),even though <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> costs haverisen <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>eligible families (those onthe right of the 2009 peak). To acerta<strong>in</strong> extent, then, changes <strong>in</strong>CCAP have been successful.F.THE USE OF ILLINOISCHILD CARE ASSISTANCEDespite its limitations, CCAP supportedan average of 47,000 CookCounty families each month dur<strong>in</strong>gthe 2009 report year, while assistance<strong>for</strong> foster <strong>care</strong> helped thousandsmore. To take advantage ofthis assistance, an eligible familymust first f<strong>in</strong>d a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providerwill<strong>in</strong>g to work with the IDHS orDCFS payment system. The Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource andReferral Program asks providers onits database whether or not they arewill<strong>in</strong>g to accept <strong>child</strong>ren withCCAP or DCFS vouchers. In 2009:• Eighty-two (82) percent of CookCounty centers listed with Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> said theywould accept <strong>child</strong>ren whosefamilies use CCAP.• Fewer centers (just 61 percent)accept DCFS assistance <strong>for</strong>foster <strong>child</strong>ren.• N<strong>in</strong>ety-one (91) percent oflicensed home providers listedwith Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>(2,656 providers) reported thatthey accept <strong>child</strong>ren whosefamilies use CCAP. Sixty-one(61) percent reported that theyaccept <strong>child</strong>ren who haveDCFS vouchers.Providers themselves report theabove data to Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>Children</strong>. CCAP has separatereports on the number of providerswho actually receive payment atany given time. In January 2009,<strong>for</strong> example, 1,147 <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers and 2,962 licensed homes<strong>care</strong>d <strong>for</strong> Cook County <strong>child</strong>renapproved <strong>for</strong> CCAP.Referrals Given to FamiliesEligible <strong>for</strong> Child Care AssistanceIn 2009, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>received calls from 8,239 families<strong>in</strong> search of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> referrals.Of these families, 86 percent had<strong>in</strong>comes at or below 200 percentof the federal poverty level, mak<strong>in</strong>gthem <strong>in</strong>come-eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP.Note: In Section V we return tothe topic of CCAP and report onthe total number of <strong>child</strong>ren eligible<strong>in</strong> Cook County and the numberof eligible <strong>child</strong>ren not be<strong>in</strong>g served.In Section VI we report on the typesof <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> used by families receiv<strong>in</strong>gCCAP support.12


I. Family Dilemma: Child Care Af<strong>for</strong>dabilityWHY DOES CHILD CARE IN CENTERS COST SO MUCH?Child <strong>care</strong> centers are an expensive option <strong>for</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois families.On average, center tuition <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ranks 8th highest amongthe states <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> and 10th highest <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong> of afour-year-old. As a percentage of typical family <strong>in</strong>come, twoparentfamilies <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois pay 13.9 percent of their <strong>in</strong>come <strong>for</strong><strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> and 10.3 percent <strong>for</strong> four-year-old <strong>care</strong>. aCenters charge so much <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> because they payso much <strong>for</strong> salaries and benefits, which generally account<strong>for</strong> more than half of a center’s expenses. b Ironically centersalaries and benefits are high not because <strong>in</strong>dividuals earna lot—they do not—but because centers need to employ somany people to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren. Licens<strong>in</strong>g and accreditationstandards follow best practices <strong>for</strong> high quality centers <strong>in</strong>mandat<strong>in</strong>g high ratios of adults to <strong>child</strong>ren.SALARIES IN COOK COUNTYIt is no secret that <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> workers generallyare not well-paid. In 2007 <strong>in</strong> Cook County, full-time centerteachers <strong>in</strong> full-year licensed programs earned an average of$12.02 per hour, while assistant teachers earned $9.00. cThis amounts to less than half of what public elementaryschool teachers earn (<strong>in</strong> a system fully subsidized by the publicsector). Elementary school teachers also are more likely tohave benefits such as health <strong>in</strong>surance and retirement plansthan are <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> teachers.SALARIES AND QUALITYIn th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about the high cost of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, we need to beaware that staff compensation also affects the quality of the<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supplied by centers and homes. One major aspectof quality, the relationship between provider and <strong>child</strong>, sufferswhen lower compensation makes it difficult to reta<strong>in</strong> staff.Better tra<strong>in</strong>ed, more experienced, and more skilled teachers,<strong>for</strong> example, will generally cost a center or home more tohire and reta<strong>in</strong> than less tra<strong>in</strong>ed, less experienced, and lessskilled staff.Low compensation rates <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> result <strong>in</strong> high turnoveramong staff. In Ill<strong>in</strong>ois, <strong>for</strong> every 100 early <strong>child</strong>hood teacherswork<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> centers <strong>in</strong> 2007, some 28 left their jobs <strong>in</strong> theprevious two years. For every 100 assistant teachers, 41 lefttheir jobs. A further consequence of this high turnover rateis a lower level of job experience: <strong>in</strong> 2007, half of teachersand assistant teachers had worked <strong>in</strong> their current <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers less than 4.0 and 2.3 years respectively. dS<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>adequate compensation is one reason why <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>experiences such work<strong>for</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>stability, studies f<strong>in</strong>d that lowquality is generally correlated with low cost. On average, thecenter or home that pays below go<strong>in</strong>g rates <strong>for</strong> staff willoffer lower quality <strong>care</strong>. eChild <strong>care</strong> providers thus face a vex<strong>in</strong>g dilemma. They mustkeep staff compensation low <strong>in</strong> order to stay <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, butneed to keep compensation high <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a highquality of <strong>care</strong> and pay a liv<strong>in</strong>g wage.a National Association of Child Care Resource And Referral Agencies, The HighPrice of Child Care: 2008 Update, Appendix, Detail Tables 2,3, 7 & 8.Accessed, February 12, 2009 athttp://issuu.com/naccrra/docs/price_report_2008?mode=embed&documentId=080804140003-bbe790955515407da7e25ef36c3bdef1&layout=whiteb A study of Massachusetts’ <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers found that 71 percent of anaverage center’s expenses go to salaries and benefits. The Cost and Qualityof Full Day Care, Year-round Early Care and Education <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts(A study prepared <strong>for</strong> the Massachusetts Department of Education by theWellesley College Centers <strong>for</strong> Women, 2001).c Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Salary and Staff<strong>in</strong>g Survey of Licensed Child Care Facilities: FY 2007(A study prepared <strong>for</strong> the Department of Human and Community Developmentby Philip C. Garnier, May 2008.) Table 28.d Ibid., Tables 8 and 19.e Of course, this is true only on average, and not <strong>for</strong> all programs. Many skilledand dedicated teachers rema<strong>in</strong> at very low salaries.13


II. Family Dilemma: Access toAvailable Child Care SlotsA.CHILD CARE PROVIDERSAND SLOTS IN COOKCOUNTYA family’s access to <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>depends on both af<strong>for</strong>dability andavailability. Child <strong>care</strong> supply <strong>in</strong>Cook County comes from a rich mixof entrepreneurs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividualproviders, educators, non-profit and<strong>for</strong>-profit enterprises, and publicagencies. Appendix 3 discussessome of the factors that enter <strong>in</strong>tothe supply of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. This sectionexam<strong>in</strong>es some critical elementsof that supply: the number ofproviders, their geographical distributionacross Cook County, and thenumber of slots they have available.Table II-1 shows the best count wecan provide of the number of <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> programs <strong>in</strong> Cook County,while Table II-2 shows the numberof <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> slots provided by theseprograms. Each table divides theprograms <strong>in</strong>to type of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>sett<strong>in</strong>g. These types of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>sett<strong>in</strong>gs are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Glossary.Appendix 4 discusses the datasources we use <strong>in</strong> more detail.These tables understate the actualnumber of providers <strong>in</strong> CookCounty and the <strong>child</strong>ren they canserve. Centers and homes that areexempt from licens<strong>in</strong>g do not haveto list their slots with any officialsource, so many go uncounted. 9While a large number of licenseexemptcenters do list their programswith the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>Children</strong> Resource and ReferralProgram, our list of license-exempthome providers <strong>in</strong> Cook County isfar less extensive.Table II-1.Child Care Programs <strong>in</strong> Cook County*Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> and DCFS, June 2009Type of Program June 2008 June 2009Child Care Centers & School Age Programs 1,404 1,456Child Care Centers 1,041 1,087School Age Only Programs 205 218Summer Only Programs 158 151Family Child Care 21,935 21,397Licensed Homes 3,965 3,946License-Exempt Homes 17,970 17,451Total Child Care Programs 23,339 22,853* See Appendix 4 <strong>for</strong> methodology.Note that the TOTAL row adds dissimilar homes and centers together and should be considered a totalonly <strong>for</strong> recorded <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> establishments irrespective of size.Table II-2. Child Care Slots <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyIncludes daytime slots only.*Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> and DCFS, June 2009Type of Program June 2008 June 2009Child Care Centers 117,994 120,005Child Care Centers 83,269 86,343School Age Only Programs 14,824 14,437Summer Only Programs 19,901 19,225Family Child Care 89,965 88,736Licensed Homes 29,309 29,349Licensed Homes—additional school age slots** 6,746 7,034License-Exempt Homes*** 53,910 52,353Total Spaces <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> 207,959 208,741* Licensed homes have the capacity to serve an additional 14,076 <strong>child</strong>ren dur<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>g hours while<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers provide an additional 1,874 even<strong>in</strong>g slots. See Section III-A.** Licensed home providers with assistants may be licensed to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> up to four school-age <strong>child</strong>rendur<strong>in</strong>g out-of-school time <strong>in</strong> addition to their regular day-time capacity.*** To estimate slots <strong>in</strong> license-exempt homes, we multiply the number of license-exempt homes knownthrough the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance Program by three <strong>child</strong>ren per home. License-exempthome providers legally can <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> no more than three <strong>child</strong>ren unless all <strong>child</strong>ren are related.While this number reflects the potential capacity of license-exempt home providers, on averagethe actual number of <strong>child</strong>ren enrolled per provider is closer to two.14


In 2009, there were 1,456 full-time<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers offer<strong>in</strong>g 100,780<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> slots dur<strong>in</strong>g the full yearor school year, as well as 19,225full-time slots dur<strong>in</strong>g the summermonths. Child <strong>care</strong> centers offeredmore than half of the total knownfull and school-year capacity <strong>in</strong>Cook County.As of June 2009, DCFS had listed3,946 licensed family and group<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes <strong>in</strong> Cook Countywith slots <strong>for</strong> 36,383 <strong>child</strong>ren. Eachprovider was licensed to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong>an average of 7.4 <strong>child</strong>ren dur<strong>in</strong>gthe day, not <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g up to fouradditional school age <strong>child</strong>ren theymay be licensed to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>gout-of-school time. However, onlyproviders with assistants can <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> more than eight <strong>child</strong>ren atone time. 10The tables also <strong>in</strong>dicate the numberof known license-exempt homeproviders and their available slots.As mentioned, license-exempt homeproviders are a much more elusivegroup to gather statistics on. NeitherDCFS nor the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>Children</strong> Resource and ReferralProgram has significant <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mationon license-exempt home providers,although we learn more aboutthis group every year through theResource and Referral Program.We know most about those licenseexempthome providers who receivepayments from CCAP <strong>for</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> to low-<strong>in</strong>come work<strong>in</strong>gfamilies, so those are the ones wereport on here.In 2009, some 34,600 Cook Countylicense-exempt home providersreceived CCAP payments dur<strong>in</strong>g atleast one month of the year, thoughfewer participate at any one time.In June 2009, there were 17,451license-exempt home <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers receiv<strong>in</strong>g CCAP payments.Home providers who have licenseexemptstatus may legally <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong>as many as three <strong>child</strong>ren who arenot their own. 11 While we provisionallyestimate 52,353 slots <strong>in</strong> knownlicense-exempt homes <strong>in</strong> Table II-2,the reader should be aware thatmany, though not all, license-exempthome providers do not offer <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> slots <strong>in</strong> the same way thatcenters and licensed homes do.Instead, many are relatives, neighborsor family friends who chooseto <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> particular <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>for</strong>particular periods of time rather thanoffer <strong>care</strong> to any <strong>child</strong> as part ofan ongo<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess.B.WHERE ARE THEPROVIDERS AND SLOTS?Some parents will have a moredifficult time f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>because of where they live. The120,005 spaces <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>centers are almost evenly dividedbetween Chicago and suburbanCook County, though there aresome differences. School ageprograms are more abundant,or at least better reported, <strong>in</strong> thesuburbs, while summer-onlyprograms are more abundant,or better reported, <strong>in</strong> Chicago.Two-thirds of the 36,383 licensedhome spaces are located <strong>in</strong>Chicago. Table II-3 shows howcenter and licensed home slotsare distributed throughout theregions of Cook County.Table II-4 presents the distributionof the 52,353 known license-exempthome slots. Aga<strong>in</strong>, these datarepresent only a portion of theactual number of license-exempthome providers—those serv<strong>in</strong>gfamilies us<strong>in</strong>g CCAP. We know,however, that license-exempt <strong>care</strong>is used widely across all <strong>in</strong>comes.Seventy-eight (78) percent of thelicense-exempt home providers15


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyTable II-3. Full-Time and School Age Child Care Slots <strong>in</strong>Cook County RegionsIncludes daytime slots only.Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program and DCFS, June 2009N & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban SuburbanProgram Type Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook CookChild Care Centers 11,625 12,116 19,228 18,610 7,738 17,026School Age Only Programs 1,676 1,487 2,005 6,056 1,128 2,085Summer Only Programs 3,700 3,115 6,735 3,177 665 1,833Licensed Homes 2,977 4,658 11,950 1,793 2,566 5,405Licensed Homes—additional school age slots 809 1,122 3,127 266 580 1,130Total Center andLicensed Home Slots 20,787 22,498 43,045 29,902 12,677 27,479Total Slots as a Percentof <strong>Children</strong> Under Age 13 12% 17% 17% 14% 13% 18%Table II-4. License-Exempt Home Child Care SlotsSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance Program, June 2009N & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban SuburbanProgram Type Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook CookTotal 3,366 13,071 24,306 1,218 2,835 7,557Home of Non-Relative 621 2,097 3,879 228 459 1,314Relative’s Home 1,275 5,349 9,774 477 1,233 3,159Non-Relative <strong>in</strong> Child’s Home 558 2,442 4,662 183 411 1,272Relative <strong>in</strong> Child’s Home 912 3,183 5,991 330 732 1,812participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> CCAP are located<strong>in</strong> Chicago. The table shows thenumerical concentration of theseslots <strong>in</strong> Chicago’s South and South -western and Central and West regions,mirror<strong>in</strong>g the distribution of low<strong>in</strong>comefamilies who are eligible <strong>for</strong>CCAP. Of the suburban licenseexempthome slots, 65 percent fallwith<strong>in</strong> the South and Southwesternsuburban region.License-exempt home <strong>care</strong> canbe broken down further <strong>in</strong>to <strong>care</strong>provided by relatives versus nonrelativesand <strong>care</strong> provided <strong>in</strong> the<strong>child</strong>’s home versus the provider’shome. Table II-4 shows the distributionof these four types of licenseexempthome <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> the sixCook County regions.Maps 1 and 2 show how centerand licensed home slots addedtogether are spread among the<strong>in</strong>dividual communities of CookCounty. License-exempt home slotsare not <strong>in</strong>cluded here because thedata we have provide only a portionof a widely unknown supply andbecause the supply of licenseexempthome <strong>care</strong> is more variablethan licensed <strong>care</strong> as we expla<strong>in</strong>edearlier <strong>in</strong> this section. 12 Whileproviders have more <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>slots <strong>in</strong> Chicago than <strong>in</strong> suburbanCook County overall, the numberof slots varies substantially <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual suburban communitiesand Chicago neighborhoods.16


II. Family Dilemma: Access to Available Child Care SlotsMap 1: Center and Licensed Home Full-Time &School-Age Slots <strong>in</strong> Cook County MunicipalitiesMap 1:Center and Licensed Home Full-Time & School-Age Slots <strong>in</strong> Cook County MunicipalitiesEast Dundee0Elg<strong>in</strong>200Barr<strong>in</strong>gton Hills0Inverness0Schaumburg3,108Palat<strong>in</strong>e1,614Arl<strong>in</strong>gton Heights2,127Wheel<strong>in</strong>g546Des Pla<strong>in</strong>es1,468Northbrook1,123Glenview1,666Mount ProspectGolfHoffman Estates1,24801,555 Morton Grove370Evanston2,521Streamwood457Bartlett102Barr<strong>in</strong>gton185South Barr<strong>in</strong>gton40Hanover Park375Hoffman Estates1,555Roselle195Roll<strong>in</strong>g Meadows262Buffalo Grove208Elk Grove Village1,266Prospect Heights270Rosemont140Schiller Park134Park Ridge416Niles1,510Northfield138Glencoe120Harwood Heights38Norridge393W<strong>in</strong>netka87Wilmette214Skokie1,373L<strong>in</strong>colnwood128Kenilworth0Full-time or and School-Age Spaces0 - 200201 - 700701 - 1,3001,301 - 3,108Chicago: 72,024 spacesLemont438Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resourceand Referral Program, June 2009Frankl<strong>in</strong> Park340 River Grove137Elmwood ParkNorthlake279169 Melrose ParkStone Park 61416River ForestBerkeley466Bellwood26Maywood Oak Park1,3041,601 1,988Hillside369Forest ParkBroadview 378Westchester440Cicero277 North Riverside 1,273Berwyn0La Grange Park982Riverside67 Brookfield 66107StickneyLyonsLa Grange141Western Spr<strong>in</strong>gs193621Forest View334McCook0Countryside 0 Summit0200Indian Head ParkHodgk<strong>in</strong>sBed<strong>for</strong>d Park060Burr RidgeJustice0154Willow Spr<strong>in</strong>gs Bridgeview0114Hickory Hills274Orland Park1,005T<strong>in</strong>ley Park799Burbank160Oak Lawn592Palos Hills Chicago Ridge401 Worth389537Palos Park256Orland Hills30Palos Heights347Matteson940Alsip325Crestwood30Oak Forest547Hometown0Midlothian220Country Club Hills711Richton Park781Evergreen Park173Merrionette Park0Blue Island565Robb<strong>in</strong>s296Posen87Riverdale1,102Dixmoor13Harvey1,283Olympia Fields268 Chicago Heights994Dolton1,279Markham947 South Holland1,332Hazel Crest965University Park17Flossmoor464Homewood675Calumet Park260Phoenix70East Hazel Crest7Thornton0Glenwood420Ford Heights248Steger238Burnham546Calumet City1,756Lans<strong>in</strong>g605Lynwood303Park ForestSauk Village1,067 South Chicago Heights 21836017


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyMap 2: Center and Licensed Home Full-Time &School-Age Slots <strong>in</strong> Chicago Community AreasMap 2:Center and Licensed Home Full-Time & School-Age Slots <strong>in</strong> Chicago Community AreasO'Hare132Edison Park155Norwood Park313Dunn<strong>in</strong>g491Montclare157Forest Glen179Jefferson Park188Portage Park755Belmont Crag<strong>in</strong>1,555 Hermosa822Irv<strong>in</strong>g Park1,006Avondale785West Ridge1,178Logan Square890Rogers Park1,342North Park428L<strong>in</strong>coln SquareAlbany Park 662970North Center324Edgewater594Uptown1,777Lake View1,117L<strong>in</strong>coln Park1,083Aust<strong>in</strong>5,238Garfield Ridge526Clear<strong>in</strong>g189Humboldt Park2,450West Garfield Park500North Lawndale2,201West Lawn628West Town1,544East Garfield Park893Near West Side1,662Near North Side1,282Loop805Near South SideLower West Side766862Armour SquareSouth Lawndale296838Bridgeport Douglas301 205McK<strong>in</strong>ley ParkOakland284183Brighton ParkGrand BoulevardArcher Heights249405New City1,0251,300West Elsdon329Kenwood845Fuller ParkGage Park188Hyde Park663Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Park 527484EnglewoodChicago LawnWoodlawn8342,434972West Englewood1,173Greater Grand Cross<strong>in</strong>g1,740South Shore2,302Full-time and school-age School-Age spaces Spaces81 - 500501 - 1,0001,001 - 1,8001,801 - 5,238Ashburn1,849Mount Greenwood96Auburn Gresham2,890Beverly876Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Heights1,746Morgan Park1,037Chatham1,445Roseland2,417West Pullman1,423Avalon Park644Burnside81Pullman228Calumet Heights623South Deer<strong>in</strong>g417South Chicago1,556East Side326Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resourceand Referral Program, June 2009Riverdale165Hegewisch17918


II. Family Dilemma: Access to Available Child Care SlotsTable II-5. Full-Time Child Care Center Slots <strong>in</strong> Cook County by AgeSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, June 2009N & NW West S & SW SuburbanN & NW C & W S & SW Chicago Suburban Suburban Suburban CookAge Chicago Chicago Chicago Total Cook Cook Cook Total TotalInfant 275 617 688 1,580 1,404 374 1,145 2,923 4,503Toddler 450 788 960 2,198 1,746 536 1,527 3,809 6,0072-year-old 1,334 1,538 2,889 5,761 2,680 882 2,221 5,783 11,5443- to 4-year-old 3,543 2,901 5,607 12,051 4,670 2,318 4,136 11,124 23,1755-year-old to K 2,341 2,024 3,966 8,331 3,523 1,528 2,794 7,845 16,176School-Age: Be<strong>for</strong>e or After School 2,929 2,393 3,280 8,602 7,122 1,551 2,830 11,503 20,105School Age: Summer Only 2,856 3,193 6,252 12,301 3,656 760 1,981 6,397 18,698Total 13,728 13,454 23,642 50,824 24,801 7,949 16,634 49,384 100,208C.CENTER SLOTS BY AGESome parents have more difficultyf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> because of theages of their <strong>child</strong>ren. This sectionexam<strong>in</strong>es the number of <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>each age group that Cook County<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers can serve. Home<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers have more flexibility<strong>in</strong> the ages of <strong>child</strong>ren theycan enroll and the ages of <strong>child</strong>renthey serve change frequently. Forthis reason we do not provide comparabledata <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes.In 2009, 1,207 <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centerslisted with Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>reported the number of <strong>child</strong>renthey serve per age group. Table II-5shows the distribution of 100,208known slots <strong>in</strong> licensed and licenseexempt<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers amongthe different age groups <strong>in</strong> the sixregions of Cook County. 13 Overall,the total age-identified center slotsare split <strong>in</strong> a fairly equal mannerbetween Chicago and suburbanCook County regions.It is often noted that <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> andschool-age <strong>care</strong> are among themost difficult <strong>for</strong> parents to f<strong>in</strong>d.Table II-5 confirms this notion. Witha total of 4,503 slots, fewer placesexist <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants than any other agegroup under school age. The situationis similar <strong>for</strong> toddlers. Chicagohas only half as many <strong>in</strong>fant andtoddler slots as suburban CookCounty; <strong>in</strong> Chicago there are moreslots <strong>for</strong> two-year-olds than <strong>for</strong><strong>in</strong>fants and toddlers comb<strong>in</strong>ed. Thislimited supply of <strong>in</strong>fant and toddlerslots is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g, as it is costly<strong>for</strong> centers to provide <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> thisage group. Many families with<strong>in</strong>fants and toddlers look to family<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes <strong>for</strong> this <strong>care</strong>; however,even family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes,understandably, are limited by law to<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> no more than three <strong>child</strong>renunder age 2 at one time unless anassistant is present.Programs <strong>for</strong> school-age <strong>child</strong>ren,with a total of 20,105 be<strong>for</strong>e- andafter-school slots, have the lowestnumber of slots per age. There arealmost twice as many slots listed <strong>for</strong>just three-year-olds through five-yearoldsas there are <strong>for</strong> the entire schoolagegroup, ages 6 through 12. The19situation is similar <strong>for</strong> school-agesummer <strong>care</strong>. The North andNorthwest suburban region doesparticularly well <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>for</strong>eandafter-school slots compared toother regions. Note, however, thata significant number of school ageproviders are not licensed by DCFSand, if they do not list their programwith Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>, maygo uncounted.D.REFERRALS GIVENTO PARENTS IN 2009BY CHILD AGEParents look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> oftenseek referrals from Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong><strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>’s referral service.As <strong>in</strong> previous years, <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>referrals were most often requested<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren under age 2—morethan one-third of all requests. Theproportion of requests <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant<strong>care</strong> was particularly high <strong>in</strong> theNorth and Northwest Chicago andthe Central and West Chicagoregions. See Table II-6 <strong>for</strong> the break -down of referral requests by <strong>child</strong>age and region.


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyTable II-6. Requests <strong>for</strong> Child Care by AgeSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY2009N & NW West S & SW CookN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban Suburban CountyAge Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook Cook TotalUnder 2 1,315 792 1,452 495 438 374 4,86650% 45% 40% 39% 36% 30% 41%2-year-old 347 263 512 171 150 173 1,61613% 15% 14% 14% 12% 14% 14%3- to 4-year-old 445 321 703 326 289 305 2,38917% 18% 19% 26% 24% 25% 20%5-year-old & K 137 92 230 62 93 84 6985% 5% 6% 5% 8% 7% 6%School-Age 392 303 763 205 233 297 2,19315% 17% 21% 16% 19% 24% 19%Total 2,636 1,771 3,660 1,259 1,203 1,233 11,762100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%BEST AND WORST REGIONS FOR FINDING INFANT CARE IN 2009A family look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a center or licensed home willlikely have the greatest success <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> if they live <strong>in</strong> theSouth and Southwest suburban region of the <strong>county</strong>. This regionhas a low number of <strong>in</strong>fants per <strong>in</strong>fant slot, both <strong>in</strong> centers and <strong>in</strong>licensed homes, mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier <strong>for</strong> families to f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>care</strong>.The North and Northwest Suburban region also fares well <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>fant center <strong>care</strong>. However, <strong>for</strong> a family priced out of thistype of <strong>care</strong>, there are relatively few licensed home options<strong>in</strong> the region.Infant <strong>care</strong> is most scarce <strong>in</strong> the North and Northwest Chicagoregion. Here center <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong> is more than twice as scarceas <strong>in</strong> any other region, and licensed home <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants isless abundant than almost all other areas.Families <strong>in</strong> South and Southwest Chicago will have an easiertime f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g licensed home <strong>care</strong> than families <strong>in</strong> other regions,but will face some challenge f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g center <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong>.Number of Infantsper Center SlotNumber ofInfants perLicensed HomeProviderNorth and Northwest Chicago 60 44Central and West Chicago 18 18South and Southwest Chicago 27 12North and Northwest Suburban Cook 11 67West Suburban Cook 21 23South and Southwest Suburban Cook 9 14Note: The number of <strong>in</strong>fants per region is from the 2000 Census anddoes not reflect population changes over the last n<strong>in</strong>e years.20


III. Family Dilemma: F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Child Carethat Matches the Family’s ScheduleMost <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> programs areavailable only dur<strong>in</strong>g the daytimeon weekdays, but half of part-timeemployees and one-third of full-timeemployees work non-traditionalschedules that <strong>in</strong>clude at least someeven<strong>in</strong>g, night, or weekend hours.Many also work schedules thatchange periodically, sometimes withlittle notice. Some of the most commonor fastest-grow<strong>in</strong>g jobs requirenon-traditional hours, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gretail, food services, office clean<strong>in</strong>g,hospitals, and nurs<strong>in</strong>g homes. Ingeneral, low pay<strong>in</strong>g jobs are morelikely to require parents to worknon-traditional schedules than betterpay<strong>in</strong>g jobs. 14 These work schedulesgive rise to one of the most <strong>in</strong>tract -able problems fac<strong>in</strong>g many parentsseek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>: relatively fewprograms accommodate parents’needs <strong>for</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, over -night <strong>care</strong>, weekend <strong>care</strong>, or <strong>care</strong>on a variable schedule.A.PROVIDERS OFFERINGCARE DURING NON-TRADITIONAL HOURSTable III-1 shows the number andpercentage of centers and homes<strong>in</strong> Cook County available <strong>for</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> to refer parentsto <strong>for</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, overnight<strong>care</strong>, weekend <strong>care</strong>, and <strong>care</strong>dur<strong>in</strong>g rotat<strong>in</strong>g shifts.In the table, several facts stand outabout the availability of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>dur<strong>in</strong>g non-traditional hours. First,only five (5) percent of centersoffer <strong>care</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>g hours,and even fewer offer overnight orweekend <strong>care</strong>. In terms of bothnumbers and percentages, more<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes than centers offernon-traditional hours of <strong>care</strong>. WhileTable III-1.Cook County Providers with Non-Traditional Care*Source: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, June 2009Percent of AllSuburbanListed CentersChicago Cook County Total or HomesCenters with Any Non-Traditional Care 88 139 227 20%Even<strong>in</strong>g 27 29 56 5%Overnight 2 2 4 0%Weekend 12 9 21 2%Rotat<strong>in</strong>g Shifts 59 112 171 15%Homes with Any Non-Traditional Care 1,813 698 2,511 86%Even<strong>in</strong>g 1,530 536 2,066 71%Overnight 101 41 142 5%Weekend 261 110 371 13%Rotat<strong>in</strong>g Shifts 679 299 978 33%*Here even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> is def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>care</strong> provided between 7 p.m. and 2 a.m., while overnight <strong>care</strong> is <strong>care</strong>provided between 2 a.m. and 5 a.m.more than two-thirds of homes arelicensed to provide even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>,as with centers only a small percentageoffer overnight or weekend<strong>care</strong>. 15 More centers and homesaccommodate families need<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>on rotat<strong>in</strong>g schedules.The fact that homes are morelikely than centers to offer nontraditionalhours of <strong>care</strong> confirmsthe commonly-held belief that <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> homes are more flexible thancenter programs <strong>in</strong> accommodat<strong>in</strong>gparents’ work schedules. In addition,the availability of homes <strong>in</strong>more geographic areas offersgreater flexibility <strong>for</strong> parents: the2,511 home sites <strong>in</strong> Cook Countyoffer<strong>in</strong>g non-traditional hours aremore convenient geographically <strong>for</strong>parents than the 227 center sites.Noteworthy differences exist betweenChicago and suburban Cook County:72 percent of homes offer<strong>in</strong>g nontraditionalhours of <strong>care</strong> fall with<strong>in</strong>Chicago, while suburban CookCounty outnumbers Chicago <strong>in</strong> thenumber of centers offer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>dur<strong>in</strong>g rotat<strong>in</strong>g shifts.Table III-2 breaks down the numberof even<strong>in</strong>g slots by type of <strong>care</strong> andregion. The North and Northwestregion of suburban Cook County hasthe fewest number of even<strong>in</strong>g slots,while the South and SouthwestChicago region has the greatestnumber. In recent years, licensedeven<strong>in</strong>g capacity has been grow<strong>in</strong>g.Between 2003 and 2009, the totalnumber of even<strong>in</strong>g slots <strong>in</strong> licensed<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers <strong>in</strong>creased 342percent from 428 to 1,890. Dur<strong>in</strong>gthe same period, even<strong>in</strong>g slots <strong>in</strong>licensed homes rose 268 percent,from 3,820 to 14,076. While moreproviders are be<strong>in</strong>g licensed <strong>for</strong>even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> recent years, it isnot clear how many actually provideeven<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> and <strong>for</strong> how many<strong>child</strong>ren they do so.21


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyTable III-2. Even<strong>in</strong>g Slots by Cook County Region*Sources: DCFS and Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, June 2009N & NW West S & SW CookN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban Suburban CountyType of Care Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook Cook TotalChild Care Centers 52 78 300 171 297 992 1,890Licensed Homes 1,212 2,319 7,297 151 573 2,524 14,076Total Even<strong>in</strong>g Slots 1,264 2,397 7,597 322 870 3,516 15,966*Includes those centers or homes licensed <strong>for</strong> a nighttime capacity by DCFS (nighttime def<strong>in</strong>ed as the majority of <strong>care</strong> between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m.)and those licensed-exempt centers list<strong>in</strong>g an even<strong>in</strong>g shift with Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>.ALBERTA REYES: WORKINGMOTHER WITH PRESCHOOLER.INCOME IS $16,138 PER YEAR.Figure III-1.Percent of <strong>Children</strong> <strong>in</strong> Need of Non-traditional Hours of CareSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY2009Each week Alberta works four10-hour shifts overnight, exceptoccasionally when bus<strong>in</strong>ess is slowand she is told not to come <strong>in</strong>. Wehave already learned that CCAPallows Alberta to af<strong>for</strong>d a range of<strong>care</strong> types, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a centerand <strong>in</strong> a licensed <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> home.018%13%Even<strong>in</strong>g Care■ Chicago8%6%Weekend Care■ SuburbsHowever, Alberta’s work schedulepresents a barrier to us<strong>in</strong>g centeror licensed home <strong>care</strong>. Less thanone percent of centers and only five(5) percent of licensed homes <strong>in</strong>Cook County offer <strong>care</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g herovernight work hours. As a result,family, friend, or neighbor <strong>care</strong>rema<strong>in</strong>s the most realistic option<strong>for</strong> Alberta.Despite growth <strong>in</strong> the amount of<strong>care</strong> provided dur<strong>in</strong>g non-traditionalhours, families look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g these times have areduced pool of center and licensedhome slots available to them whencompared with families need<strong>in</strong>gweekday, daytime <strong>care</strong>. S<strong>in</strong>ce nontraditionalwork schedules often gohand-<strong>in</strong>-hand with low-<strong>in</strong>come jobs,families seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>gnon-traditional hours are often challengedwith af<strong>for</strong>dability issues aswell. It is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g, then, thatmany parents turn to relatives, friendsand neighbors to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong>ren.These providers often offer amore flexible and af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> alternative.B.REFERRALS GIVEN TOPARENTS IN NEED OFNON-TRADITIONALHOURS OF CHILD CAREParents sought <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> referrals<strong>for</strong> 11,762 <strong>child</strong>ren through Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2009. Sixteen(16) percent of these <strong>child</strong>renneeded <strong>care</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>g hours,and 8 percent needed <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>dur<strong>in</strong>g weekend hours. Figure III-1gives the percentage of <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>need of even<strong>in</strong>g and weekend <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> Chicago and suburban CookCounty.22


IV. Family Dilemma:F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the Right ProviderFigure IV-1. Reasons Parents Chose Their New Provider, by Child AgeSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY200980%■ Birth to 2 ■ 3 to 5 ■ School Age40%23% 26% 28% 32% 33% 34% 34% 35%29%27%37%28%24%19% 18%68%44% 44%60% 59%0%9% 7% 6% 5% 7% 9%Af<strong>for</strong>dability Clean and Educational Experienced Location Schedule Warm & Car<strong>in</strong>g Small Group OtherSafe Environment Caregiver Environment SizeEnvironmentThe story of parents’ search <strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> goes well beyond criticalquestions of the parents’ workschedules, the region where theparents live or work, the <strong>child</strong>’s age,and the type of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>gthat parents want <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong>.Each <strong>child</strong> is a specific <strong>in</strong>dividual andhas <strong>in</strong>dividual needs that parentshope the right provider can meet.Figure IV-2. Types of Special NeedsSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY200920016810010178665775142A.WHAT DO CHILDREN NEED?We have limited data on the <strong>in</strong>dividualneeds that parents most seek toaccommodate. One good piece of<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about what parents look<strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> a provider comes from a surveyof parents who use the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource andReferral program. As part of thesurvey, parents were asked tocheck the top three reasons whythey chose their new <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>provider. Figure IV-1 shows the topreasons of the 1,344 respondents<strong>in</strong> 2009 based on their <strong>child</strong>’s age.The predom<strong>in</strong>ant reason <strong>for</strong> all agegroups was the location of <strong>care</strong>,followed by a warm and car<strong>in</strong>genvironment. An educational environmentwas important, particularly0Developmental Asthma/ Autism Physical Emotional/ Special OtherDelays Severe Behavioral HealthAllergiesNeeds<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren under age 5, as was aclean and safe environment <strong>for</strong> allage groups. About one quarter offamilies said they based their decisionon af<strong>for</strong>dability of <strong>care</strong>.B.SPECIAL NEEDSIn addition to every <strong>child</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>dividualneeds, some <strong>child</strong>ren have specialneeds. In 2009, parents requestedreferrals from Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>Children</strong> <strong>for</strong> 463 <strong>child</strong>ren with oneor more special needs. Of all <strong>child</strong>renwith a special need, 36 percenthad a developmental delay and22 percent had asthma or severeallergies. Figure IV-2 shows thenumber of <strong>child</strong>ren with each typeof need.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> askedparents what problems, if any, theyencountered while seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>. Only 34 percent of familieswith no <strong>child</strong>ren with specialneeds encountered problemswith f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> as compared to45 percent of families with a <strong>child</strong>with special needs.23


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyIn addition, 44 percent of familieswith no <strong>child</strong> with special needssaid they had found <strong>care</strong>, comparedwith 38 percent of families with <strong>child</strong>renwith special needs. Familieswith <strong>child</strong>ren with special needs weremore likely to say they were stillundecided about the <strong>care</strong> they woulduse. Figure IV-3 presents the resultsof families’ search <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.C.LANGUAGE NEEDSA parent’s ability to communicateeasily with his or her <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>provider is important, as parentsand providers need to share<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about a <strong>child</strong>’s health,well-be<strong>in</strong>g, and development. Acommon language is likely to fostera parent’s sense of trust of the <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> provider as well as a will<strong>in</strong>gnessto become <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<strong>child</strong>’s program.Fifteen (15) percent of the CookCounty population speaks limitedEnglish, with the majority of those(63 percent) speak<strong>in</strong>g Spanish. 16In 2009, 10 percent of familiesus<strong>in</strong>g Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>’sreferral service sought a providerwho could speak a language otherthan English, the predom<strong>in</strong>antlanguage be<strong>in</strong>g Spanish.Figure IV-3. Follow Up Survey: Ability to F<strong>in</strong>d Child CareSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY20097%5%34%32%44%38%Keep<strong>in</strong>g Did Not F<strong>in</strong>d Found No Decided NotFormer Care, Still Care Decision to UseCare Look<strong>in</strong>g Child Care■ Families with no <strong>child</strong>ren with special needsIf families with limited Englishlanguagecapacity want to communicatewith their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider<strong>in</strong> their native language, their <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> options will narrow. Of theproviders who are on the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Referral database,19 percent of licensed homeproviders reported they can fluentlyspeak a language other than English,while 43 percent of centers saidthey have a staff member who speaksa language other than English. Incenters, though, that particularperson may not be the staff memberwho <strong>care</strong>s directly <strong>for</strong> the <strong>child</strong>.8%17%3% 5%■ Families with <strong>child</strong>ren with special needs24


V. Public Dilemma: Who Needs ChildCare? Who Needs Support?The public sector <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois facesits own dilemmas <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g familiesaddress their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> needs,particularly <strong>in</strong> decid<strong>in</strong>g how manyresources should be devoted tosupport<strong>in</strong>g families’ <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>needs <strong>in</strong> comparison to other criticalneeds. In consider<strong>in</strong>g this issue, thepublic must decide who needs <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>, how much <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> the publicshould support, what k<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>care</strong>to support, and who needs assistancepay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.The majority of data presented <strong>in</strong> thissection are from the 2000 Census,and over the last n<strong>in</strong>e years populationsmay have shifted somewhat.These data should be used moreas an impression of where families,<strong>child</strong>ren, and poverty are <strong>in</strong> CookCounty <strong>in</strong> 2009, rather than as anexact count.A. CHILD POPULATION,POVERTY AND LOW INCOMETable V-1. <strong>Children</strong> <strong>in</strong> Cook County, 2000 Census<strong>Children</strong> Chicago Total Suburban Cook Total Total Cook CountyUnder 3 Years 131,472 101,662 233,134Ages 3 through 5 129,764 108,764 238,528Ages 6 through 12 302,221 260,216 562,437Totals 563,457 470,642 1,034,099Under 3, In Poverty 36,522 8,873 45,395% of Age Group <strong>in</strong> Poverty 28% 9% 19%Ages 3-5, In Poverty 37,557 9,773 47,330% of Age Group <strong>in</strong> Poverty 29% 9% 20%Ages 6-12, In Poverty 88,077 22,868 110,945% of Age Group <strong>in</strong> Poverty 29% 9% 20%Under 3, Income Eligible* 69,457 24,502 93,959% of Age Group Eligible* 53% 24% 40%Ages 3-5, Income Eligible* 70,824 26,619 97,443% of Age Group Eligible* 55% 24% 41%Ages 6-12, Income Eligible 166,957 61,200 228,157% of Age Group Eligible* 55% 24% 41%* Income-eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP. The <strong>in</strong>come limit is 200% of the federal poverty level based on family size.The work requirement <strong>for</strong> CCAP is not factored <strong>in</strong> here. Ages of <strong>child</strong>ren both <strong>in</strong> poverty and<strong>in</strong>come-eligible are calculated from the proportions of all <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> different age groups.More than one million <strong>child</strong>renages 12 and under reside <strong>in</strong> CookCounty. The first four rows of TableV-1 categorize <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> Chicagoand suburban Cook County by agegroups based on the U.S. Census2000. As the table shows, morethan 54 percent of the <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>Cook County <strong>in</strong> 2000 resided <strong>in</strong>Chicago. Potentially all of the <strong>child</strong>renage 5 and under need <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> or early education. Similarly,many older <strong>child</strong>ren ages 6 through12 need be<strong>for</strong>e- or after-school<strong>care</strong>. It is unrealistic, however, tosuppose that the parents of allthese <strong>child</strong>ren actually seek <strong>care</strong>.The next six rows of Table V-1 showlevels of poverty among <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>Cook County, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that up to29 percent of the <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>Chicago were liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> poverty <strong>in</strong>2000. Chicago <strong>child</strong>ren were morethan three times as likely to live <strong>in</strong>poverty than other Cook County<strong>child</strong>ren. Because poverty rateshave risen s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, the rates <strong>for</strong>both regions are now likely higherthan the table <strong>in</strong>dicates.The f<strong>in</strong>al six rows of Table V-1 pre -sent the number of <strong>child</strong>ren liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>families whose <strong>in</strong>comes make themeligible <strong>in</strong> 2009 <strong>for</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ChildCare Assistance (CCAP). In Ill<strong>in</strong>ois,a family’s <strong>in</strong>come can rise 100 percentabove the federal poverty levelbe<strong>for</strong>e the family is no longer eligible<strong>for</strong> assistance. Under this standard,slightly more than half of Chicago<strong>child</strong>ren under age 13 and almostone-quarter of suburban <strong>child</strong>ren<strong>in</strong> Cook County are <strong>in</strong>come-eligible<strong>for</strong> CCAP. Note that <strong>in</strong> addition tothe <strong>in</strong>come requirement, CCAP alsorequires that all parents present <strong>in</strong>the family be <strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce or<strong>in</strong> education or tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programs.Work<strong>in</strong>g parents are discussed <strong>in</strong>section B below.Table V-2 breaks down the same<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>child</strong> population,poverty and low <strong>in</strong>come <strong>for</strong> thesix regions of the <strong>county</strong>. Families<strong>in</strong> poverty and families with low<strong>in</strong>comes tend to concentrate <strong>in</strong>the western and southern parts of25


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyTable V-2. <strong>Children</strong> <strong>in</strong> Cook County by Region, 2000 CensusN & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban Suburban<strong>Children</strong> Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook CookUnder 3 Years 44,551 31,292 55,629 47,193 22,465 32,004Ages 3 through 5 39,172 30,806 59,786 49,475 24,174 35,115Ages 6 through 12 87,102 71,408 143,711 117,634 53,412 89,170Under 3, In Poverty 7,331 11,887 17,304 2,569 2,562 3,742and % <strong>in</strong> Poverty 16% 38% 31% 5% 11% 12%Ages 3-5, In Poverty 6,729 12,142 18,686 2,676 2,886 4,211and % <strong>in</strong> Poverty 17% 39% 31% 5% 12% 12%Ages 6-12, In Poverty 15,682 27,800 44,595 6,475 5,671 10,722and % <strong>in</strong> Poverty 18% 39% 31% 6% 11% 12%Under 3, Income Eligible 17,870 20,173 31,414 8,253 7,135 9,113& % Eligible* 40% 64% 56% 17% 32% 28%Ages 3-5, Income Eligible 16,670 20,311 33,843 8,649 7,818 10,153& % Eligible* 43% 66% 57% 17% 32% 29%Ages 6-12, Income Eligible 38,408 47,987 80,562 20,089 16,406 24,704& % Eligible* 44% 67% 56% 17% 31% 28%* Income-eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP. The <strong>in</strong>come limit is 200% of the federal poverty level based on family size. The work requirement <strong>for</strong> CCAP is not factored <strong>in</strong> here.Ages of <strong>child</strong>ren both <strong>in</strong> poverty and <strong>in</strong>come-eligible are calculated from the proportions of all <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> different age groups.Chicago. The southern and westernparts of suburban Cook County alsohave more poverty and more familieseligible CCAP than the <strong>county</strong>’sNorth and Northwest regions. 17As much as 39 percent of <strong>child</strong>renliv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Cook County region areliv<strong>in</strong>g below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. Withrespect to <strong>in</strong>comes that make familieseligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP, as little as 17percent and as much as 67 percentof <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> different age groupslive <strong>in</strong> families eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP.B.CHILDREN WITHWORKING PARENTSPublic policy often supports work<strong>in</strong>gfamilies <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>. To estimate the demand <strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a region such as CookCounty, researchers often start withthe number of families with everyparent work<strong>in</strong>g outside of the homeand ignore families with at least oneparent not <strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce. Thisapproach neglects the fact thatsubstantial numbers of parents whoare not <strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce still seek<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to attend schoolor <strong>for</strong> other reasons such as disabilityor illness. This also assumes thatall families with every parent <strong>in</strong> thelabor <strong>for</strong>ce must turn to externalsources <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, neglect<strong>in</strong>gthe fact that families might haveother relatives available to <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong>the <strong>child</strong>ren and that many parentsstagger their work schedules so oneparent is always available to provide<strong>care</strong>. It is important to keep thesecomplexities <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d when review<strong>in</strong>gthe data that follow on families withall present parents work<strong>in</strong>g.Of the approximately 472,000 <strong>child</strong>renunder age six <strong>in</strong> Cook County<strong>in</strong> 2000, about 50 percent, or238,000 <strong>child</strong>ren, lived <strong>in</strong> families<strong>in</strong> which all parents present <strong>in</strong> thehome were <strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce. Thismeans either the s<strong>in</strong>gle parent <strong>in</strong> as<strong>in</strong>gle-parent family or both parents<strong>in</strong> a two-parent family were <strong>in</strong> thelabor <strong>for</strong>ce. 18 The percentage of<strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> families with all work<strong>in</strong>gparents <strong>in</strong> suburban Cook Countyis 56 percent while <strong>in</strong> Chicago it is53 percent. Table V-3 presents thenumber of such <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> the sixregions of Cook County.26


V. Public Dilemma: Who Needs Child Care? Who Needs Support?Table V–3. <strong>Children</strong> With All Present Parents <strong>in</strong> Labor Force, 2000 CensusN & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban Suburban<strong>Children</strong> Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook Cook<strong>Children</strong> Under 6 Years 41,778 26,678 56,394 51,614 23,105 38,38653% 49% 56% 55% 53% 61%Table V-4. Estimate of Unserved <strong>Children</strong><strong>Children</strong> Eligible <strong>for</strong> Child Care Assistance But Not Receiv<strong>in</strong>g ItCalculated from 2000 Census and Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance Program June 2009 dataN & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban Suburban<strong>Children</strong> Chicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook CookUnder 3 Years 6,761 5,687 7,975 3,135 1,562 1,099Ages 3-5 5,645 5,016 7,804 3,052 1,560 926Ages 6-12 18,103 19,255 34,245 11,402 6,504 9,758Total: 30,509 29,958 50,023 17,589 9,626 11,783Cook County Total: 149,489C. CHILDREN ELIGIBLEFOR BUT WITHOUT CHILDCARE ASSISTANCEFor a family to be eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP,every parent present <strong>in</strong> the homeneeds to be work<strong>in</strong>g, 19 and family<strong>in</strong>come can be no higher than 200percent of the federal poverty level<strong>for</strong> a family of its size. We havelooked at <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> families thatare <strong>in</strong>come-eligible <strong>in</strong> Tables V-1and V-2 above, as well as <strong>child</strong>renunder age 6 with all present parents<strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> Table V-3 above.This section takes the analysis to itslogical next step: comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the twoto estimate the number of <strong>child</strong>ren<strong>in</strong> the six regions of Cook Countywho are eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP but donot receive it. 20Table V-4 presents these estimates<strong>for</strong> the different age groups andregions. We estimate that <strong>in</strong> anygiven month, 14 percent of CookCounty <strong>child</strong>ren ages 12 and under(149,489 <strong>child</strong>ren) live <strong>in</strong> familiesthat are eligible <strong>for</strong> but do notreceive CCAP support. About20 percent of Chicago <strong>child</strong>ren are<strong>in</strong> this group of unserved <strong>child</strong>ren,while the suburban Cook Countyportion is 8 percent.Do all of these <strong>child</strong>ren have anunmet need <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>? Wecannot suppose that the parents ofevery eligible <strong>child</strong> would chooseto use CCAP even if it were offeredto them. Some parents might preferto have a relative <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> the <strong>child</strong>(with little or no payment); someparents might not be able to f<strong>in</strong>d a<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider to match theiroff-hour or chang<strong>in</strong>g work schedules;others might not be able toaf<strong>for</strong>d to pay a provider even if theyreceive Assistance; some parentsmay stagger their work schedules<strong>in</strong> order to share car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> their<strong>child</strong>ren; and yet others may haveenrolled <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> an educationalprogram such as Head Start orIll<strong>in</strong>ois Preschool <strong>for</strong> All and aresatisfied with those hours of <strong>care</strong>.The figures <strong>in</strong> Table V-4, then,should be seen as an upper endof a range rather than an on-targetestimate of unmet need <strong>for</strong> CCAPsupport. 21 We can say that asmany as 149,489 <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> CookCounty eligible <strong>for</strong> CCA are notus<strong>in</strong>g it.We should note that this estimatehas important limitations. The estimateis based on 2000 Censusdata on families and <strong>child</strong>ren. Itdoes not capture changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong>population and family <strong>in</strong>come (thatis, changes <strong>in</strong> eligibility <strong>for</strong> CCAP)over the last n<strong>in</strong>e years.27


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyPUBLIC DILEMMASThe work<strong>in</strong>g mother of three <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong>troduced earlier <strong>in</strong> this report, Candace Thomas, rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>eligible <strong>for</strong>CCAP. If she earned just $200 less, she would be eligible. Yet, the State of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois recently expanded thenumber of families eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP and has room to expand further under the federal <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> block grant.Should the state do this?Candace pays about $12,700 of her $44,800 annual salary <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a licensed home, more than28 percent of her <strong>in</strong>come, while the national average spent on <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is about 7 percent.* Do Candaceand her <strong>child</strong>ren deserve <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> support? If so, does she deserve as much as the $9,564 <strong>in</strong> CCAPsupport that would reduce her <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> expenditure to 7 percent of her <strong>in</strong>come? Does she deserve theadditional $22,000 that would put her <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> high quality educational sett<strong>in</strong>gs?Should the only realistic option available to the couple <strong>in</strong>troduced earlier, Gabrielle and Shawn Harris, belicense-exempt <strong>care</strong>?Ill<strong>in</strong>ois policy makers, of course, face a dilemma <strong>in</strong> balanc<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> Child Care Assistance with fund<strong>in</strong>g<strong>for</strong> other items, such as improv<strong>in</strong>g education and health <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren. And with<strong>in</strong> CCAP itself, theState must also balance two goals: <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of families that receive CCAP support and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gthe amount of assistance that goes to <strong>in</strong>dividual families already <strong>in</strong> the program.**While others may disagree, most <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> advocates believe that the State of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois can contribute more toboth sides of the balance without threaten<strong>in</strong>g the public treasury even <strong>in</strong> hard times. Not only are expenditureson CCAP an effective economic stabilizer that helps prevent unemployment, but as an <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> a work<strong>in</strong>gmother and her <strong>child</strong>ren, it helps her work to her full productive potential and prevents the social isolationof <strong>child</strong>ren that makes them more at-risk.Support<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g families and promot<strong>in</strong>g early education strengthens our work<strong>for</strong>ce and better preparesour <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>for</strong> success as adults.* Like many work<strong>in</strong>g parents, she may also be eligible <strong>for</strong> a very modest <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong>come tax credit.** Either way, an <strong>in</strong>crease would go directly to a <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider and affect the quality of <strong>care</strong> that provider can offer.28


VI. Child Care Choices ofCook County FamiliesThere is only limited <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mationon the type of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> used byfamilies <strong>in</strong> Cook County and thereasons beh<strong>in</strong>d parents’ choices.Much of what we do know comesfrom CCAP data and from familiesus<strong>in</strong>g Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>’sResource and Referral program.The results presented <strong>in</strong> this section,however, cannot be generalizedto represent the entire population.Figure VI-1 shows the types of<strong>care</strong> used by Cook County familieswith CCAP accord<strong>in</strong>g to the ageof the <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> <strong>care</strong>. In each agegroup, the use of home <strong>care</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>atesover center <strong>care</strong>. Theuse of license-exempt home <strong>care</strong>is especially high <strong>for</strong> school-age<strong>child</strong>ren. Sixty-two (62) percent of6- to 13-year-olds and 77 percentof <strong>child</strong>ren over 13 with specialneeds are <strong>care</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> licenseexempthomes. <strong>Children</strong> under age2 are also more likely to be <strong>care</strong>d<strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> license-exempt homes thancenters or licensed homes.Center <strong>care</strong> is utilized most by3- to 5-year-olds; this is not surpris<strong>in</strong>gconsider<strong>in</strong>g there are morecenter slots available <strong>for</strong> this agegroup and center <strong>care</strong> is moreaf<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong> this age than <strong>for</strong>younger ages. Also, many parentswish to enroll their preschool-age<strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> more <strong>for</strong>mal programsto prepare them <strong>for</strong> k<strong>in</strong>dergarten.Figure VI-1. Type of Care Used by Child Age:Cook County Families with Child Care AssistanceSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance Program data, June 2009100%50%0%33% 30%39%44%27% 31% 51%31%20%21% 18%62%19%6%Under Age 2 Age 2 Ages 3 to 5 Ages 6 to 13 Over 13(special needs)■ Center Care ■ Licensed Home Care ■ Exempt Home CareFigure VI-2. Type of Care Used by Region:Cook County Families with Child Care AssistanceSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance data, June 2009100%50%0%56%25% 25% 25% 24%58%48%36%24%82%16%6%55%25% 27%77%33%19%N & NW C & W S & SW N & NW West S & SWChicago Chicago Chicago Suburban Suburban SuburbanCook Cook Cook■ Center Care ■ Licensed Home Care ■ Exempt Home Care56%Figure VI-2 presents differences <strong>in</strong>use of center <strong>care</strong>, licensed home<strong>care</strong>, and license-exempt home <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> the six regions of Cook County. 22In the North and Northwest suburbanregion, an overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g numberof families access<strong>in</strong>g CCAP,29


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyTable VI-1. Type of Care Chosen by Families Us<strong>in</strong>g Referral Program, by RegionSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource and Referral Program, FY2009N & NW West S & SWN & NW C & W S & SW Suburban Suburban SuburbanChicago Chicago Chicago Cook Cook CookRelative (license-exempt) 5% 6% 10% 10% 15% 10%Non-Relative (license-exempt) 8% 6% 13% 6% 15% 12%Licensed Home 36% 27% 34% 21% 36% 34%Center 52% 64% 43% 64% 35% 50%Totals per region exceed 100 percent because some families use more than one <strong>care</strong> arrangement.82 percent, utilize center <strong>care</strong>.The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g suburban regions aswell as the North and NorthwestChicago region use center andhome <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> roughly equal proportions.Families <strong>in</strong> the South andSouthwest Chicago region and theCentral and West Chicago regionhave the highest use of licenseexempthome <strong>care</strong> and the lowestuse of center <strong>care</strong>.Another source of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation onparents’ <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> decisions comesfrom the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>Resource and Referral program.Parents use this service becausethey want or need to f<strong>in</strong>d a <strong>care</strong>giverbeyond, or <strong>in</strong> addition to, a relativeor friend they already know. Datafrom this program represent parentswho seek ma<strong>in</strong>ly licensed home<strong>care</strong> or center <strong>care</strong>, though theseparents may ultimately decide to uselicense-exempt home <strong>care</strong>.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> asks allparents who seek <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> referralsto complete a follow up surveyabout their search experience. In2009, 31 percent of familiesresponded to the survey.Table VI-1 shows the types of <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> chosen by parents receiv<strong>in</strong>greferrals. In the North and Northwestsuburbs where home <strong>care</strong> is scarceand <strong>in</strong> the Central and West regionof Chicago, a larger percentage offamilies chose center <strong>care</strong>. Theopposite was true <strong>for</strong> the South andSouthwest region of Chicago wherehome <strong>care</strong> is more abundant than<strong>in</strong> other regions. Home <strong>care</strong> alsowas predom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the West suburbanregion. While 12 percent to 30percent of families chose licenseexempthome providers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>grelatives, the majority selectedlicensed <strong>care</strong>.We asked parents what problemsthey encountered while search<strong>in</strong>g<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Sixty-five (65) percentof families stated they had no problemsf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>. Of familiesreport<strong>in</strong>g one or more problems,the top issues they encounteredwere a lack of open<strong>in</strong>gs, high costs,the location of <strong>care</strong> and scheduleproblems. Of course, many of theseproblems are <strong>in</strong>terrelated—a parentmight f<strong>in</strong>d no open<strong>in</strong>gs at the costthey can af<strong>for</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the areas <strong>in</strong> whichthey are search<strong>in</strong>g. Figure VI-4shows the frequency of problemsencountered. (See also Figure IV-3where we report on families’ success<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>.)Figure VI-3Problems EncounteredWhen Seek<strong>in</strong>g Child CareSource: Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> Resource andReferral Program, FY2009Not Experienced 2%Not Tra<strong>in</strong>ed 2%OtherCould Not Accommodate 4%Did Not Take Subsidy 1%Quality9%8%17%Cost5%Type of CareLocationCurriculum 1%14%11%26%No Open<strong>in</strong>gs30Schedule


ConclusionF<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the right <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is oneof the most important decisionsthat a parent faces, and with moreoptions, the likelihood is greater thatparents will succeed <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g theprovider best suited <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong>.But costs, schedules, and availabilitylimit parents’ choices—this is especiallytrue <strong>for</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come parents.Each <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> programhas characteristics that parentsmay f<strong>in</strong>d attractive—perhaps anespecially warm and experienced<strong>care</strong>giver, a well-developed curriculum,a <strong>care</strong>giver with experiencewith a particular disability, or avibrant, visually appeal<strong>in</strong>g facility.Ideally, a family's <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> decisionwould be based on the program'squality and its ability to meet the<strong>child</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>dividual needs.Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, limit<strong>in</strong>g factors play arole <strong>in</strong> the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process,particularly <strong>for</strong> middle- and low<strong>in</strong>comefamilies. Most significantly,the high cost of center or licensedhome programs can prohibit familiesfrom us<strong>in</strong>g these types of <strong>care</strong>.While CCAP helps some familiesaccess these services, not all familieswho need assistance qualify <strong>for</strong>it, and sometimes even with assistance,these <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>gs canstill be too costly.Many families are also limited bythe number of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> open<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong> their community—we f<strong>in</strong>d thisparticularly the case <strong>for</strong> parentsseek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>care</strong>. Other familiesf<strong>in</strong>d that it is not just about f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gopen<strong>in</strong>gs, but f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g them at theright times. A grow<strong>in</strong>g number offamilies work outside the traditionalMonday through Friday daytimeschedule, yet most center andlicensed home sett<strong>in</strong>gs do not offer<strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> the even<strong>in</strong>gs, overnight, oron weekends.While many types of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>exist, the reality is that many familiesdo not have options. We hope thisreport will provide <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to therealities faced by work<strong>in</strong>g familiesand the types of support that thesefamilies and their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers need.We hope this data on <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>supply and demand will guide advocatesand policy makers as theywork to improve the accessibilityof quality <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> all families<strong>in</strong> Cook County and the Stateof Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.31


Footnotes1 Consumer prices as measured by CPI-U by U.S.Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics;http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm, accessedDecember, 2009.2 2008 American Community Survey, U.S. CensusBureau. This is the last year available at the timeof writ<strong>in</strong>g. The Census does not present data onsuburban Cook County as we do.3 Average annual tuition and fees paid <strong>for</strong> a 4-yearpublic <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>for</strong> the 2008-2009school year, from www.collegeill<strong>in</strong>ois.com.4 See <strong>for</strong> example, the National Child Care Survey,1990 and Child Care Expenses of AmericanFamilies, Urban Institute, 1997. The CensusBureau f<strong>in</strong>ds that <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> payments average7.0 percent <strong>for</strong> families with employed mothersand with <strong>child</strong>ren under 15. The average is higherat 9.0 percent <strong>for</strong> families with <strong>child</strong>ren under five.Hav<strong>in</strong>g lower <strong>in</strong>comes raises the percentages.Who’s M<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the Kids? Child Care Arrangements:Summer 2006, U.S. Bureau of the Census,December 2009, Table 6.5 If we used 6 percent as a rule of thumb, these<strong>in</strong>comes must be over $175,400 and $303,000respectively <strong>in</strong> Chicago and over $199,000 and$346,000 <strong>in</strong> suburban Cook County.6 Effective April 1, 2008, the amount a family canearn to be eligible <strong>for</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistancerose from 185 percent to 200 percent of thefederal poverty level.7 For details, see the follow<strong>in</strong>g:http://www.act<strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong>ren.org/_data/global/images/Cost_of_Care_1Child_Family_of_4_FY09.pdf8 In some cases, the parent(s) can be <strong>in</strong> school<strong>in</strong>stead of work<strong>in</strong>g. The chart assumes that parentsreceiv<strong>in</strong>g Child Care Assistance pay their assignedco-payment as well as the difference between theprice their <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider charges and the ratetheir provider is reimbursed by the Child CareAssistance Program.9 Even when the number of slots is known, it isonly an estimate of the number of <strong>child</strong>ren served.Some providers might have empty slots, <strong>in</strong> whichcase the number of slots exceeds the number of<strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> the <strong>care</strong> of these providers. On theother hand, two or more part-time <strong>child</strong>ren mightfill some slots, <strong>in</strong> which case the number of <strong>child</strong>ren<strong>in</strong> <strong>care</strong> exceeds the number of slots.10 A home’s operator might not want to provide <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> the home’s full legal or licensed capacity.11 If the <strong>child</strong>ren are all related, the provider can <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> more than three at one time.12 The fact that many, though not all, license-exempthomes do not strictly offer slots but have morepersonal and variable enrollment creates enormousproblems <strong>for</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supply anddemand. A related but smaller problem is thatwhile centers and homes are legally licensed <strong>for</strong>a certa<strong>in</strong> number of <strong>child</strong>ren, some restrict theiractual enrollment to a smaller number.13 These are slots <strong>for</strong> which an age is specificallymentioned. About 18,000 slots have no ageattached.14 Work<strong>in</strong>g Later <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois: Work Schedules,Incomes and Parents’ Access to Child Care,Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>, 2006.15 Data on the number of home providers offer<strong>in</strong>geven<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> are based on the hours a provideris licensed to provide <strong>care</strong>. Though 71 percentof homes are licensed to provide even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>,it is not clear how many actually provide it.16 2000 Census. Percent of the population age 5and over that speaks a language other than Englishand speaks English less than “very well.”17 Here low-<strong>in</strong>come means below 200 percent ofthe federal poverty level. Of course, a closer lookat each region would f<strong>in</strong>d that some smaller areaswith<strong>in</strong> a region have more heavily concentratedpoverty and lower <strong>in</strong>comes than other areas.18 Technically the labor <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>cludes unemployedpeople look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> work. We count these, s<strong>in</strong>ceparents look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> work need <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Another27 percent of <strong>child</strong>ren live <strong>in</strong> two-parent familiesthat have only one parent <strong>in</strong> the labor <strong>for</strong>ce.19 In Ill<strong>in</strong>ois, parents may be <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or school,but <strong>in</strong> practice relatively few parents, approximately12 percent, get approval unless they work outsideof the home.20 To arrive at the measure of <strong>child</strong>ren with apossible unmet need <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance,we (1) comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>in</strong>come-eligibilityand work-eligibility to estimate the number of <strong>child</strong>renwho are eligible <strong>for</strong> CCAP and (2) from thisnumber, subtract the number of <strong>child</strong>ren whoactually received that assistance <strong>in</strong> a recentmonth (June 2009).21 Of course, some parents who are currently <strong>in</strong>eligiblebecause they have higher <strong>in</strong>comes or whoare <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong> school might have a need <strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance and would use it if they wereeligible. In this sense, our estimate undercountssome need.22 S<strong>in</strong>ce some parents use more than one type of<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> while their case is active, percentagescan exceed 100 percent.33


A P P E N D I X 1The Six Cook County RegionsChicago and Suburban Cook RegionsChicago and Suburban Cook RegionsNorth & Northwest Suburban CookNorth & Northwest ChicagoCentral & West ChicagoWest Suburban CookSouth & Southwest ChicagoSouth & Southwest Suburban CookThroughout this Report we divideCook County <strong>in</strong>to six geographicalregions: three <strong>in</strong> Chicago andthree <strong>in</strong> suburban Cook County.The map and tables on the next twopages of this Appendix def<strong>in</strong>e thesix regions.The most recognizable <strong>for</strong>m ofChicago geographical units arethe Chicago Community Areas,which correspond to city neighborhoods.This Appendix places the77 Chicago Community Areas <strong>in</strong>tothree Chicago regions: North andNorthwest Chicago; Central andWest Chicago; and South andSouthwest Chicago.The most recognizable Cook Countygeographical units are municipalities.The Appendix identifies the threesuburban Cook County regionsaccord<strong>in</strong>g to the Cook Countymunicipalities belong<strong>in</strong>g to eachregion: North and NorthwestSuburban Cook County; WestSuburban Cook County; and Southand Southwest Suburban CookCounty.When present<strong>in</strong>g census data<strong>for</strong> Chicago and Cook County <strong>in</strong>this report, we built our aggregateunits from data <strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividualChicago Community Areas andmunicipalities. Our aggregate data,there<strong>for</strong>e, may deviate somewhatfrom aggregate data provided bythe U.S. Census.35


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyNORTH ANDNORTHWESTSUBURBANCOOKArl<strong>in</strong>gton HeightsBarr<strong>in</strong>gtonBartlettDes Pla<strong>in</strong>esEast DundeeElg<strong>in</strong>Elk Grove VillageElmwood ParkEvanstonFrankl<strong>in</strong> ParkGlencoeGlenviewGolfHanover ParkHarwood HeightsHoffman EstatesInvernessKenilworthL<strong>in</strong>colnwoodMorton GroveMount ProspectNilesNorridgeNorthbrookNorthfieldNorthlakePalat<strong>in</strong>ePark RidgeProspect HeightsRiver GroveRoll<strong>in</strong>g MeadowsRosemontSchaumburgSchiller ParkSkokieSouth Barr<strong>in</strong>gtonStreamwoodWheel<strong>in</strong>gWilmetteW<strong>in</strong>netkaWESTSUBURBANCOOKBed<strong>for</strong>d ParkBellwoodBerkeleyBerwynBridgeviewBroadviewBrookfieldBurr RidgeCiceroCountrysideForest ParkForest ViewHillsideHodgk<strong>in</strong>sIndian Head ParkJusticeLa GrangeLa Grange ParkLyonsMaywoodMcCookMelrose ParkNorth RiversideOak ParkRiver ForestRiversideStickneyStone ParkSummitWestchesterWestern Spr<strong>in</strong>gsWillow Spr<strong>in</strong>gsSOUTH ANDSOUTHWESTSUBURBANCOOKAlsipBlue IslandBurbankBurnhamCalumet CityCalumet ParkChicago HeightsChicago RidgeCountry Club HillsCrestwoodDixmoorDoltonEast Hazel CrestEvergreen ParkFlossmoorFord HeightsGlenwoodHarveyHazel CrestHickory HillsHometownHomewoodLans<strong>in</strong>gLemontLynwoodMarkhamMattesonMerrionette ParkMidlothianOak ForestOak LawnOlympia FieldsOrland HillsOrland ParkPalos HeightsPalos HillsPalos ParkPark ForestPhoenixPosenRichton ParkRiverdaleRobb<strong>in</strong>sSauk VillageSouth Chicago HeightsSouth HollandStegerThorntonT<strong>in</strong>ley ParkWorthNORTH ANDNORTHWESTCHICAGOAlbany ParkAvondaleBelmont Crag<strong>in</strong>Dunn<strong>in</strong>gEdgewaterEdison ParkForest GlenHermosaIrv<strong>in</strong>g ParkJefferson ParkLake ViewL<strong>in</strong>coln ParkL<strong>in</strong>coln SquareLogan SquareMontclareNorth CenterNorth ParkNorwood ParkO'HarePortage ParkRogers ParkUptownWest RidgeCENTRALAND WESTCHICAGOAust<strong>in</strong>East Garfield ParkHumboldt ParkLoopLower West SideNear North SideNear South SideNear West SideNorth LawndaleSouth LawndaleWest Garfield ParkWest TownSOUTH ANDSOUTHWESTCHICAGOArcher HeightsArmour SquareAshburnAuburn GreshamAvalon ParkBeverlyBridgeportBrighton ParkBurnsideCalumet HeightsChathamChicago LawnClear<strong>in</strong>gDouglasEast SideEnglewoodFuller ParkGage ParkGarfield RidgeGrand BoulevardGreater Grand Cross<strong>in</strong>gHegewischHyde ParkKenwoodMcK<strong>in</strong>ley ParkMorgan ParkMount GreenwoodNew CityOaklandPullmanRiverdaleRoselandSouth ChicagoSouth Deer<strong>in</strong>gSouth ShoreWash<strong>in</strong>gton HeightsWash<strong>in</strong>gton ParkWest ElsdonWest EnglewoodWest LawnWest PullmanWoodlawn36


A P P E N D I X 2The Demand <strong>for</strong> and Supply ofChild Care—Basic FactorsWHY DEMAND ANDSUPPLY?Many analysts believe that understand<strong>in</strong>gthe demand <strong>for</strong> and supplyof <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is critical. Withoutsuch knowledge, we can neverknow whether a region such asCook County has enough <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>services. Nor can we understandwhy <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> prices are ris<strong>in</strong>g orwhat the effects of ris<strong>in</strong>g rates are:<strong>for</strong> example, whether ris<strong>in</strong>g pricesprimarily drive work<strong>in</strong>g parents awayfrom us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> or primarilyencourage <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers toexpand and provide higher quality<strong>care</strong>. F<strong>in</strong>ally, understand<strong>in</strong>g supplyand demand helps us understandways to <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> prices,expand the use of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> amongwork<strong>in</strong>g parents and improve <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> quality. This Appendix discussesthe basic concepts of demand andsupply <strong>in</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> and shows whyit is so difficult to speak about themauthoritatively.DemandFamilies with <strong>child</strong>ren who want andcan af<strong>for</strong>d to place their <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong><strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> are the source <strong>for</strong> demand<strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Cook County. Theirdemand is simply how much <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> services they would buy at ago<strong>in</strong>g price. In general, the size ofthis demand depends upon the num -ber of <strong>child</strong>ren of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> age <strong>in</strong>those families, from <strong>in</strong>fants to older<strong>child</strong>ren need<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>for</strong>e- or afterschool<strong>care</strong>. Demand also hasdeeper roots <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g these factors:• Whether family <strong>in</strong>comes aresufficient to pay <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>,especially <strong>in</strong> comparison to theprices of other necessities thefamily buys.• Whether families have access to<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance programsto help pay <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> whenthey cannot af<strong>for</strong>d to buy itdirectly. For example, work<strong>in</strong>gfamilies’ access to CCAP s<strong>in</strong>ce1997 has provided a powerfulstimulus to demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.• Whether parents can af<strong>for</strong>d tostay at home with <strong>child</strong>ren orreceive <strong>in</strong>come from programssuch as the now-term<strong>in</strong>atedAid to Families with Dependent<strong>Children</strong> that allows them torema<strong>in</strong> home with <strong>child</strong>ren.• Whether families have availablesubstitutes to purchas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong>, such as these:• Relatives who can <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong>ren while parents work.• Alternative <strong>care</strong> that is availableand subsidized (HeadStart, Preschool <strong>for</strong> All, andso on).• Work schedules that allowparents <strong>in</strong> two-parent familiesto share <strong>care</strong>—one car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong>ren while the other works.• Parents’ preferences aboutlett<strong>in</strong>g others <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong>ren.This factor beh<strong>in</strong>d parents’demand often depends on the<strong>child</strong>’s age.• Parents’ perceptions of the qualityof <strong>care</strong> available.How much <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> Cook Countyfamilies will want to purchase dependson all of these factors. With thesefactors <strong>in</strong> the background, theamount of <strong>care</strong> families actuallypurchase and use depends on theprice and availability (or supply) ofthis <strong>care</strong>.SupplyIndividual providers, educators,non-profit enterprises, <strong>for</strong>-profitenterprises, and public agenciessupply <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> services <strong>in</strong> CookCounty by mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g people, facilities,and materials <strong>for</strong> the purposeof car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren. As Section IIof this Report demonstrates, <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> takes a variety of shapesacross Cook County, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gproviders <strong>in</strong> their own homes, <strong>care</strong>giverswho go to the <strong>child</strong>ren’shomes, non-profit and <strong>for</strong>-profit centers,public and private preschools,after-school programs, and so on.Many <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> program developersand directors also engage diverseagencies that f<strong>in</strong>ance, regulate zon<strong>in</strong>g,license, and accredit <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.F<strong>in</strong>ally, they recruit <strong>in</strong> labor markets<strong>for</strong> the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce andcontract with suppliers of goodsand services, such as food, build<strong>in</strong>gma<strong>in</strong>tenance, and books.Child <strong>care</strong> supply is based upon thewill<strong>in</strong>gness and ability of providersto br<strong>in</strong>g people and such resourcestogether given the cost of theresources they need. Among thefactors that we expect to <strong>in</strong>fluencethe supply of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> services <strong>in</strong>Cook County are the follow<strong>in</strong>g:• The cost of resources such asfacilities, materials, equipment,supplies, overhead, and especiallyemployees.37


The 2010 Report of Child Care <strong>in</strong> Cook County• Public, non-profit, or donorsubsidies of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gwage supplements if any exist.For example, if a religious congregationor a community agencydecides to supply space rent-freeor at a discounted rent, this willgenerally <strong>in</strong>crease the supply of<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> services <strong>in</strong> CookCounty.• Regulatory conditions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>ess, zon<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>accreditation, and licens<strong>in</strong>grestrictions. These conditionschange little from year to year,thereby not chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>supply much from year to year.They can, however, affect theoverall level of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> operations.And <strong>in</strong> some localities,zon<strong>in</strong>g changes have seriouslyaffected providers.How much <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providerswant to supply <strong>in</strong> Cook County willdepend on all of these factors. Evennon-profit providers must cover theirbasic costs and respect these restric -tions on offer<strong>in</strong>g services. Theamount of <strong>care</strong> that they actuallyprovide at any given time dependson the <strong>in</strong>come that providers derivefrom this <strong>care</strong>.USING SUPPLY ANDDEMAND ANALYSISIn economic theory, the price of<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> services and the amountactually bought is determ<strong>in</strong>ed bylevels of demand and supply. If thedemand <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> is greaterthan the amount supplied, the pricewill rise as parents seek scarceslots <strong>for</strong> their <strong>child</strong>ren. On the otherhand, if supply exceeds demand,providers may drop their prices toattract more <strong>child</strong>ren. That is the socalledlaw of supply and demand.To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether or not a <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> market actually works this way<strong>in</strong> Cook County would require aspecial study. The key po<strong>in</strong>t wewant to underscore here is thatbecause so many factors affectdemand and supply, understand<strong>in</strong>gthe total effect will be extremelycomplex.Supply and demand analysis must<strong>in</strong>corporate this complexity <strong>in</strong> orderto be useful. It must primarily bebased on excellent knowledge ofall the factors identified above as<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> demand andsupply. Leav<strong>in</strong>g out any factorcould spoil an analysis. Supply anddemand analysis must, moreover,weigh the effects of all the factors<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> marketsimultaneously. So complex is supplyand demand analysis, <strong>in</strong> fact, thatmost economists rely on sophisticatedstatistical and mathematical tools toper<strong>for</strong>m it.Short of that sophisticated, comprehensiveanalysis, supply and demandanalysis will be very partial or onesided,and when we use it weshould acknowledge it as such. Forexample, suppose we know thatnew <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center licens<strong>in</strong>gregulations will require <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>teachers to have more educationcredits <strong>in</strong> college. We might predictthat salaries of these teachers mustrise to reimburse them <strong>for</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe additional credentials, and thatwill <strong>in</strong>crease the cost of provid<strong>in</strong>g<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Higher costs of provid<strong>in</strong>g<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>, <strong>in</strong> turn, will lower theamount of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> supplied, assome providers will leave the bus<strong>in</strong>essbecause they cannot af<strong>for</strong>d topay the newly credentialed teacherswhat they demand. We can concludethat if noth<strong>in</strong>g else is chang<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> market, lower supplywill drive up the amount parentsneed to pay to f<strong>in</strong>d scarcer slots.Too frequently, however, analystsdo not acknowledge what we juststated <strong>in</strong> the italics above. Theyleave the impression that they havetold the entire story. We shouldalways acknowledge that otherevents <strong>in</strong> the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> marketmight outweigh the factor we arediscuss<strong>in</strong>g at any given moment.Perhaps teacher salaries will notrise that much, or the new credentialswill attract enough new <strong>child</strong>rento centers to cover the higher costs.Or perhaps <strong>in</strong> the next month, <strong>for</strong>example, the State of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois willgreatly <strong>in</strong>crease its subsidies to<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers. That will lowercosts and could even reverse theimpact of higher salaries on supply—ifnoth<strong>in</strong>g else is chang<strong>in</strong>g.38


A P P E N D I X 3Sources <strong>for</strong> Data on Child CareProviders <strong>in</strong> Cook CountyIn<strong>for</strong>mation on Cook County <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> providers <strong>in</strong> this report comesfrom three different sources:1. The Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>Resource and Referral Program,which ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a database ofCook County <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers.2. The Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Department of<strong>Children</strong> and Family Services(DCFS), which lists programsthat it has licensed <strong>in</strong> CookCounty.3. The Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care AssistanceProgram (CCAP), which has<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about providers who<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren with <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>assistance.The Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong>Resource and Referral program ispart of a statewide network ofResource and Referral agenciesfunded through the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Depart -ment of Human Services (IDHS).Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> <strong>in</strong>vites<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers to list theirprograms on our database and toprovide detailed <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation abouttheir programs such as the ratesthey charge parents, the number of<strong>child</strong>ren they serve per age group,languages spoken, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and educationthey have received, and othercharacteristics that help referral staffmatch parents with providers.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois <strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> supplementsits database by add<strong>in</strong>g thoseproviders licensed by DCFS whohave not agreed to list their programon our database (these providers areonly added <strong>for</strong> statistical purposesand their <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation is not sharedwith parents). In this way, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s themost comprehensive list<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> providers <strong>in</strong> Cook County,although we do not fully capturethe <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> activity that is legallyexempt from licens<strong>in</strong>g or the otherwiseillegal <strong>care</strong>.The third source of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> dataused <strong>in</strong> this report is CCAP, whichprovides the best count of knownlicense-exempt <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> programs<strong>in</strong> Cook County.Table A3 provides details on who is<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> each type of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>referred to <strong>in</strong> the report.Table A3. Child Care Providers <strong>in</strong> Cook County <strong>in</strong> 2009: Who is IncludedType of ProgramChild Care CentersSchool Age ProgramsSummer Only ProgramsNotesAny <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> center operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> the full year or the school year and offer<strong>in</strong>g some or all full-time<strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren under age 5. The center might provide school-age <strong>care</strong> as well. This category doesnot <strong>in</strong>clude private preschool programs or public preschools such as Head Start-only or Preschool<strong>for</strong> All-only programs. Park and recreation programs are <strong>in</strong>cluded if their <strong>care</strong> is full-time and <strong>for</strong>the full year or school year. Data are from June 2009.Any center that provides full-year or school-year <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren ages 5 and over only. Includesbe<strong>for</strong>e and after school programs and part-day programs <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong>ren <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>dergarten. Programsmay be center based, school based or at a park or recreation program. Data are from June 2009.Any center that provides <strong>care</strong> only dur<strong>in</strong>g the summer months. Only centers provid<strong>in</strong>g full-time <strong>care</strong>are <strong>in</strong>cluded. N<strong>in</strong>ety-one percent of these summer-only programs are park and recreation programs.Data are from June 2009.Licensed Homes Any family <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> home that is licensed by DCFS as of June 2009.License-Exempt HomesIncludes license-exempt home providers participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> CCAP <strong>in</strong> June 2009. Note that thenumber of participat<strong>in</strong>g home providers varies from month to month just as the number of participat<strong>in</strong>gfamilies varies. This category does not <strong>in</strong>clude the large number of unknown family, friend,and neighbor <strong>care</strong>givers throughout Cook County.39


Glossary of TermsCCAP. See Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child CareAssistance Program (below).Chicago Community Areas (CCA).Seventy-seven (77) <strong>for</strong>mal designationsof Chicago neighborhoods.See Appendix 1.Child Care Center. When the term isused generally throughout the report itrefers to any <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> program <strong>in</strong> afacility outside of the home that offersfull-time <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> or be<strong>for</strong>e- or afterschool<strong>care</strong>. In tables II-1 through II-3it refers more specifically to any fullyearor school-year <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centerserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong>ren under age 5 (asopposed to centers serv<strong>in</strong>g only schoolage <strong>child</strong>ren or centers provid<strong>in</strong>g onlysummer <strong>care</strong>). The term <strong>in</strong>cludes bothlicensed and license-exempt programs.Child Care Resource and ReferralAgency (CCR&R). There are 16 agenciesthroughout Ill<strong>in</strong>ois whose goal isto work with parents, bus<strong>in</strong>ess leaders,government officials and <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> providers to make high quality<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> available to Ill<strong>in</strong>ois families.This <strong>in</strong>cludes support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers, prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals toenter the <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> field, and assist<strong>in</strong>gfamilies <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> andaccess<strong>in</strong>g the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child CareAssistance Program (CCAP). Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<strong>Action</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> is a CCR&R.DCFS. See Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Department of<strong>Children</strong> and Family Services (below).Family Child Care Homes (FCC).Child <strong>care</strong> located <strong>in</strong> providers’ homes.While there are roughly 18,000 knownlicense-exempt <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes <strong>in</strong>Cook County, sometimes the termFCC refers solely to the approximately4,000 licensed <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes. Inthis report, it refers to both types of<strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> homes.Federal Poverty Level. Poverty guidel<strong>in</strong>esset by the Department of Healthand Human Services to determ<strong>in</strong>ewhether a person or family is eligible<strong>for</strong> assistance through various federalprograms.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care AssistanceProgram (CCAP). Program establishedus<strong>in</strong>g the federal Child CareBlock Grant follow<strong>in</strong>g welfare re<strong>for</strong>mto provide <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> assistance <strong>for</strong>work<strong>in</strong>g families earn<strong>in</strong>g less than 200percent of the federal poverty level.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Department of <strong>Children</strong> andFamily Services (DCFS). In thisreport: DCFS grants and en<strong>for</strong>ceslicens<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> centers andhomes. It also helps pay <strong>for</strong> <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong><strong>for</strong> foster <strong>child</strong>ren.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Department of HumanServices (IDHS). Home of the Bureauof Child Care and Development whichadm<strong>in</strong>isters many of the State’s <strong>child</strong><strong>care</strong> programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Ill<strong>in</strong>oisChild Care Assistance Program, ChildCare Resource and Referral Agencies,and the Quality Counts program.Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Network of Child CareResource and Referral Agencies(INCCRRA). A member organizationconsist<strong>in</strong>g of 16 regional Child CareResource & Referral (CCR&R) agenciesserv<strong>in</strong>g communities throughoutthe state of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois. Its goal is to makehigh quality and af<strong>for</strong>dable early <strong>care</strong>and education opportunities available<strong>for</strong> families and <strong>child</strong>ren of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.Income-eligible. A family whose<strong>in</strong>come falls under 200 percent ofthe federal poverty level, mak<strong>in</strong>g it<strong>in</strong>come-eligible <strong>for</strong> the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ChildCare Assistance Program (CCAP).Income eligibility <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois dependsupon family size.Licensed Child Care Centers.Centers that have been certified bythe Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Department of <strong>Children</strong> andFamily Services as meet<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>health and safety standards and thatare subject to <strong>in</strong>spection by DCFS.Licensed Child Care Homes. Homesthat have been certified by the Ill<strong>in</strong>oisDepartment of <strong>Children</strong> and FamilyServices as meet<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> healthand safety standards and that aresubject to <strong>in</strong>spection by DCFS.License-Exempt Child Care Centers.The Child Care Act of 1969 excludessome facilities from the requirementto be licensed. These exclusions fromthe licens<strong>in</strong>g requirement may befound <strong>in</strong> Section 2.09 of the ChildCare Act of 1969 [225 ILCS 10/2.09]and are expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Department rules89 Ill. Adm. Code 377, Facilities andPrograms Exempt from Licensure.Centers that are legally exempt fromlicens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude those run by a religious<strong>in</strong>stitution, government program,school, college or university.License-Exempt Child Care Homes.Sometimes called “family, friend andneighbor <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>” or “kith and k<strong>in</strong><strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong>.” Child <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> a homethat is legally exempt from licensurebecause the provider <strong>care</strong>s <strong>for</strong> fewerthan four unrelated <strong>child</strong>ren. In theIll<strong>in</strong>ois Child Care Assistance Program,the provider receiv<strong>in</strong>g a payment mustcomplete a registration process andhave passed a background check.Non-Traditional Hours of Care.Hours of <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> that fall outsidethe typical Monday through Friday daytime schedule (def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this reportas 5 am to 7 pm). This <strong>in</strong>cludeseven<strong>in</strong>g, overnight and weekend <strong>care</strong>,as well as days and times that changefrom one week to the next.Reimbursement Rates. The paymentlevels approved <strong>for</strong> centers, licensedhomes and license-exempt homesunder the Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Child CareAssistance Program (CCAP). Theserates vary across regions of Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.Parents pay part of the rate toproviders as parent co-payments,while CCAP pays the rema<strong>in</strong>der.Special Needs Child Care. Refers toa <strong>child</strong> <strong>care</strong> provider with experienceor tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> a <strong>child</strong> with anemotional, physical, developmental, orspecial health need or disability.40


4753 north broadway, chicago, ill<strong>in</strong>ois 60640312.823.1100 • www.act<strong>for</strong><strong>child</strong>ren.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!