Safety Assessment Program Evaluator Student Manual

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CA Emergency Mgmt. Agency Safety Assessment Program Evaluator Manual April 2011Photo courtesy Global Emergency ManagementFigure 2-30 – Parapet failure into small building, 1989 Loma Prieta EarthquakeFigure 2-26 shows a house that has a porch with severe damage, and the entire house is racked,as evidenced by the leaning columns on either corner of the house. It does not take muchracking for a structure to be pushed into failure mode; this house was correctly tagged UNSAFE.Figure 2-27 shows an unreinforced masonry building with extensive damage. The question hereis, why did the pool come up out of the ground? There could be several reasons; if the pool issited in sandy soil with a high water table, liquefaction may have caused the pool to simplybecome buoyant and rise up out of the ground. Another cause may have been a scarp thatpushed the pool up. If the latter, it needs to be identified, by a geologist or geotechnical engineerif necessary, and the information supplied to the building department via the assessment form forthis building.Figure 2-28 shows a reinforced concrete column supporting a pedestrian overcrossing thatspalled away the concrete cover protecting the rebar. Upon closer examination in Figure 2-29, itis clear that the column is now in a type of failure mode. The rebar is bent, and there is adiagonal crack through the center of the column. These conditions indicate that a P-delta effectis at work, that is translating vertical load into lateral movement. The entire area should bebarricaded off, and tagged “AREA UNSAFE,” using a felt pen to insert the word AREA in frontof the word UNSAFE on the placard. The pedestrian overcrossing should also be barricaded atboth ends and placarded UNSAFE as well.Figure 2-30 shows great damage to a small building caused by masonry collapsing into it from amuch higher one. This should also be marked AREA UNSAFE, and barricaded off from thepublic. There is no need to endanger one‟s life by posting the front of the building; the posting56
CA Emergency Mgmt. Agency Safety Assessment Program Evaluator Manual April 2011can be on grape sticks or other posts around the barricaded buildings, which should include boththe tall building and the shorter one, so the public is not threatened by falling debris.2.5.3.2 Discussion of Collapse ZonesThe dangers from weakened structures are not isolated to earthquake disasters. For examples,one of the chief dangers facing fire fighters is the structural collapse that occurs while a structurefire is being fought. A common practice is to establish a safety zone around such a structure thatis at least the height of the structure. While buildings may collapse straight down as opposed toleaning over, there is no guarantee of how a weakened building may collapse, and it is too late toset up the safety zone when the building starts to fail, so the caution shown by such a safety zoneis definitely appropriate.Better yet, engineers with the Urban Search and Rescue teams are trained to create a safety zoneone and one-half times the height of the building. So, a weakened building that is 50 feet tallwould have a safety zone 75 feet in radius around it. This allows room for the building tocollapse and for the building debris to come to rest. This federally used rule of thumb is the onepreferred by the Safety Assessment Program.Obviously, if other buildings are situated within the safety zone (or “collapse zone”), they facethe peril of being damaged or destroyed by the collapsing structure. This situation makes itimperative that they be placarded UNSAFE. The danger from the weakened structure is toogreat to do otherwise. So, in the above example, buildings within the 75 foot radius around theweakened 50 foot high building would be tagged UNSAFE due to the collapse hazard from thetall building nearby.The following is an example of how these principles were used in the 2010 Baja Earthquake.Photo courtesy Fred Turner, EERIFigure 2-31 – 150 foot tall El Centro water tower57
Page 1 and 2:
CA Emergency Mgmt. Agency Safety As
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6: CA Emergency Mgmt. Agency Safety As
Page 14: CA Emergency Mgmt. Agency Safety As
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
show all

Safety Assessment Program Evaluator Student Manual

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?