Design and Construction of Steel Plate Shear Walls - Eatherton ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

designed to resist the forces of the web plate, not onlydoes tension field action develop, but the tensiondiagonals can yield. Significant ductility and energyabsorption has been noted in this type of wall, that hasbeen referred to as “unstiffened” or “thin-walled”SPSW. It should be understood that the terms“stiffened” and “unstiffened” are a bit of a misnomer,however, as the essential difference in designmethodologies is the degree to which a plate is allowedto buckle, rather than whether stiffeners are used. Theweb plate of the SPSW shown in Fig 1 is designed todevelop tension field action at relatively low shear andwould therefore be considered unstiffened. The 2005AISC Seismic provisions and the rest of this paperonly address unstiffened SPSW.In the 1990’s considerable research on SPSWwas done in the United States by professors Bruneau,Berman, Elgaaly, Caccese, Astaneh, and others. U.S.design provisions were, for the first time, published inthe 2005 AISC Seismic provisions. Additionally,Bruneau and Sabelli are producing an AISC designguide on SPSW which is expected to includerecommendations for seismic and non-seismicapplications for SPSW. With these upcomingpublications, SPSW will gain a new level of exposurewith U.S. engineers. This paper is geared towardsdesign engineers who might be considering usingSPSW and contains:1. Discussion of design considerations whenusing the 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions.2. Comparison of SPSW to special concentrically braced frames and special momentframes.3. Summary of reasons why the author used SPSW for 3 large residences in NorthernCalifornia and experiences encountered in their design and construction.4. Suggestions for design of SPSW and future editions of SPSW code provisions.Design Considerations for SPSWFigure 1 – Steel plate shear wall usedin a high-end residence in San MateoCounty, CA.The 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions refer to SPSW as special plate shear walls. The termspecial indicates that, like special concentrically braced frames or special moment frames, thatspecial plate shear walls are expected to have increased ductility over their ordinarycounterparts. While the AISC Seismic Provisions do not include ordinary steel plate shear walls,if they are included in future editions it can be conjectured that one of the differences may besimple shear beam-to-column connections (as opposed to moment connections required forSPSW).In the process of SPSW design, the author has come across several issues that require
judgment outside of what is presented in the AISC Seismic Provisions. Questions such as howthin a plate is appropriate, how slender a wall is possible, what plate material can be used, andhow to interpret the code when it comes to column design are important in the design process,and are discussed below. First, a brief description of the design process is required to highlightsome of the issues.Design ProcessTo achieve the high level of ductility expected of SPSW, the boundary members have tobe designed to remain elastic as the plate yields. As a result, size of beams and columns aredesigned based on the plate thickness. Plate design, however, is based on angle of inclination ofthe tension field, which is dependent on the boundary members. The design process, therefore,becomes iterative, but with closed form equations is well suited for a spreadsheet.In order to begin the design process it is necessary to assume an angle of inclination, α,for the tension field relative to the vertical. AISC Seismic Provisions give an equation for α, thatwill need to be checked after boundary members are designed. The capacity of the wall andboundary member sizes will not be so sensitive to α, however, that multiple iterations are usuallynecessary, unless drift controls the design. In fact, the equation for α, is not entirely accurate.The equation is based on pinned beam to column connections with SPSW panels above andbelow. While α equations are available for other conditions, it was determined by the authors ofAISC Seismic that these variations in α are not significant. An initial estimate of 40º willusually suffice.After the plate is sized using the assumed angle, α, the expected yield force of web platethat will be applied to HBE’s and VBE’s should be calculated. The expected yield stress of theweb plate is R y F y . When reducing the expected yield stress into vertical and horizontalcomponents, the fact that the length of plate on the angle is longer than the vertical or horizontallength should be taken into account to avoid overly conservative design. For instance, thevertical component of the expected yield stress to be applied to the HBE is R y F y (cos α)(cos α)rather than just R y F y (cos α). The upcoming AISC Design Guide by Bruneau and Sabellidiscusses this further.SPSW Aspect Ratio and Intermediate HBE’sThe length of an SPSW panel is limited by an aspect ratio of 0.8
Page 1: Proceedings of the 8 th U.S. Nation
Page 5 and 6: for service loads, e.g. a stout win
Page 7 and 8: The special moment frame option was
Page 9 and 10: The last column shown in Table 1 is

Design and Construction of Steel Plate Shear Walls - Eatherton ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?