13.07.2015 Views

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 Chapter 3 • The Challenge <strong>of</strong> Broadband Wireless Channelsigated if higher frequency reuse is adopted, as shown in Figure 3.7b. However, as previouslyemphasized, this improvement in the quality <strong>of</strong> communication is achieved at the sacrifice <strong>of</strong>spectral efficiency: In this case, the available bandwidth is cut by a factor <strong>of</strong> 3. Frequency planningis a delicate balancing act <strong>of</strong> using the highest reuse factor possible while still having most<strong>of</strong> the cell have at least some minimum SIR.3.3.3 SectoringSince the SIR is so low in most <strong>of</strong> the cell, it is desirable to find techniques to improve it withoutsacrificing so much bandwidth, as frequency reuse does. A popular technique is to sectorize thecells, which is effective if frequencies are reused in each cell. Using directional antennas instead<strong>of</strong> an omnidirectional antenna at the base station can significantly reduced the cochannel interference.An illustration <strong>of</strong> sectoring is shown in Figure 3.8. Although the absolute amount <strong>of</strong>bandwidth used is three times be<strong>for</strong>e (assuming three sector cells), the capacity increase is infact more than three times. No capacity is lost from sectoring, because each sector can reusetime and code slots, so each sector has the same nominal capacity as an entire cell. Furthermore,the capacity in each sector is higher than that in a nonsectored cellular system, because the interferenceis reduced by sectoring, since users experience only interference from the sectors at theirfrequency. In Figure 3.8a, if each sector 1 points in the same direction in each cell, the interferencecaused by neighboring cells will be dramatically reduced. An alternative way to use sectors,not shown in Figure 3.8, is to reuse frequencies in each sector. In this case, all the time/code/frequency slots can be reused in each sector, but there is no reduction in the experiencedinterference.Figure 3.9 shows the regions <strong>of</strong> a three-sector cell in various SIR bins <strong>of</strong> the systems withuniversal frequency reuse and 1/3 frequency reuse. All the configurations are the same as those<strong>of</strong> Figure 3.7 except that sectoring is added. Compared to Figure 3.7, sectoring improves SIR,especially at the cell boundaries, even when universal frequency reuse is adopted. If sectoring isadopted with frequency reuse, the received SIR can be significantly improved, as shown inFigure 3.9b, where both f =1/3 frequency reuse and 120° sectoring are used.Although sectoring is an effective and practical approach to the OCI problem, it is not withoutcost. Sectoring increases the number <strong>of</strong> antennas at each base station and reduces trunkingefficiency, owing to channel sectoring at the base station. Even though intersector hand<strong>of</strong>f issimpler than intercell hand<strong>of</strong>f, sectoring also increases the overhead, owing to the increasednumber <strong>of</strong> intersector hand<strong>of</strong>fs. Finally, in channels with heavy scattering, desired power can belost into other sectors, which can cause inter-sector interference as well as power loss.Although the problem <strong>of</strong> cochannel interference has existed in cellular systems <strong>for</strong> manyyears, its effect on future cellular systems, such as <strong>WiMAX</strong>, is likely to be far more severe,owing to the requirements <strong>for</strong> high data rate, high spectral efficiency, and the likely use <strong>of</strong> multipleantennas. This is a very tough combination [2, 6]. Recent research approaches to this difficultproblem have focused on advanced signal-processing techniques at the receiver [1, 6] andthe transmitter [15, 29, 35] as a means <strong>of</strong> reducing or canceling the perceived interference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!