13.07.2015 Views

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

416 Chapter 12 • System-Level Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> <strong>WiMAX</strong>Table 12.4 Average Throughput per BS Site <strong>for</strong> Handheld and Desktop Device withBand AMC Subcarrier Permutation in DL and ULScenarioHandheld DeviceDesktop DeviceDL (Mbps) UL (Mbps) DL (Mbps) UL (Mbps)(1,1,3) reuse in Ped B 131.47 21.13 146.77 23.59(1,3,3) reuse in Ped B 57.09 9.18 57.08 9.17(1,1,3) reuse in Ped A 139.88 22.48 150.26 24.15(1,3,3) reuse in Ped A 57.62 9.26 57.86 9.30Table 12.5 Fifth and Tenth Percentile Data Rate <strong>for</strong> Basic ConfigurationScenarioHandheld DeviceDesktop Device5% (Mbps) 10% (Mbps) 5% (Mbps) 10% (Mbps)(1,1,3) reuse in Ped B 0.025 0.075 0.146 0.252(1,3,3) reuse in Ped B 0.449 0.525 0.480 0.550(1,1,3) reuse in Ped A 0.025 0.075 0.036 0.220(1,3,3) reuse in Ped A 0.351 0.490 0.406 0.517The DL throughput shown in this section is significantly higher than the UL throughout,since the number <strong>of</strong> OFDM symbols (28) allocated <strong>for</strong> the DL subframe is larger than the number<strong>of</strong> OFDM symbols (9) allocated <strong>for</strong> the UL subframe. Varying the number <strong>of</strong> symbols to be used<strong>for</strong> DL and UL subframes makes it possible to control the ratio <strong>of</strong> the DL and UL throughputs.Figure 12.7 shows the throughput per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>for</strong> the PUSC and the band AMC subcarrierpermutations. Since no precoding or beam<strong>for</strong>ming is used, depending on the multipath channelband AMC provides an improvement <strong>of</strong> only 14 percent to 18 percent in the overall sectorthroughput compared to PUSC.Figure 12.8 shows the throughput per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> the round-robin and proportional-fairness(PF) scheduling algorithms. The sector throughout improves by approximately 25 percent byusing a proportional fairness (PF) scheduler compared to a round-robin (RR) scheduler, due tothe ability <strong>of</strong> the PF scheduler to exploit multiuser diversity to a certain extent. Table 12.6 summarizesthe DL throughput <strong>for</strong> the PF and RR schedulers in various multipath environments.12.3.2 System-Level Results <strong>of</strong> Enhanced ConfigurationsIn this section, we estimate the impact on system capacity <strong>of</strong> a WIMAX network <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> theMIMO features that are part <strong>of</strong> the IEEE 802.16e-2005 standard. See Chapter 8 <strong>for</strong> a detaileddescription <strong>of</strong> the various open- and closed-loop MIMO schemes.The average per sector throughput <strong>for</strong> the basic and various enhanced configurations isshown in Figure 12.9 and Figure 12.10. Based on these results, one can conclude that both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!