13.07.2015 Views

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 OFDM Basics 121Example 4.2 In this example, we will find the minimum and maximum daterate loss due to the cyclic prefix in <strong>WiMAX</strong>. We will consider a 10MHz channelbandwidth, where the maximum delay spread has been determined tobe τ =5µsec. From Table 8.3, it can be seen that the choices <strong>for</strong> guardband size in <strong>WiMAX</strong> are G = {1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32} and the number <strong>of</strong> subcarriersmust be one <strong>of</strong> L = {128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048}.At a symbol rate <strong>of</strong> 10MHz, a delay spread <strong>of</strong> 5 µ sec affects 50 symbols, sowe require a CP length <strong>of</strong> at least v =50.The minimum overhead will be <strong>for</strong> the largest number <strong>of</strong> subcarriers, so thisyields L = 2048. In this case, vL / = 50/2048 = 1/40.96 so the minimum guardband <strong>of</strong> 1/32 will suffice. Hence, the data rate loss is only 1/32 in this case.The maximum overhead occurs when the number <strong>of</strong> subcarriers is small.If L = 128, then vL / = 50/128, so even an overhead <strong>of</strong> 1/4 won’t be sufficientto preserve subcarrier orthogonality. More subcarriers are required.For L = 256, v/L < 1/4, so in this case ISI-free operation is possible, butat a data rate loss <strong>of</strong> 1/4.Sidebar 4.1 An Alternative PrefixOne alternative to the cyclic prefix is to use a zero prefix, which constitutes anull guard band. One commercial system that proposes this is the MultibandOFDM system that has been standardized <strong>for</strong> ultrawideband (UWB) operationby the WiMedia Alliance. a As shown in Figure 4.6, the multiband OFDMtransmitter simply sends a prefix <strong>of</strong> null data so that there is no transmitterpowerpenalty. At the receiver, the “tail” can be added back in, which recreatesthe effect <strong>of</strong> a cyclic prefix, so the rest <strong>of</strong> the OFDM system can functionas usual.Why wouldn’t every OFDM system use a zero prefix, then, since itreduces the transmit power by 10log 10 ((L+v)/L) dB? There are two reasons.First, the zero prefix generally increases the receiver power by 10log 10 ((L+v)/L) dB, since the tail now needs to be received, whereas with a cyclic prefix, itcan be ignored. Second, additional noise from the received tail symbols isadded back into the signal, causing a higher noise power σ 2 →((L+v)/L)σ 2 .The designer must weigh these trade-<strong>of</strong>fs to determine whether a zero or acyclic prefix is preferable. <strong>WiMAX</strong> systems use a cyclic prefix.a. This was originally under the context <strong>of</strong> the IEEE 802.15.3 subcommittee, which hassince disbanded.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!