13.07.2015 Views

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

Praise for Fundamentals of WiMAX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.3 System-Level Simulation Results 413manually oriented in order to get a strong signal. Most <strong>WiMAX</strong> desktop devices are expected tobe equipped with six to eight such antennas, each with a gain <strong>of</strong> 3dBi to 6dBi.Figure 12.3 and Figure 12.4 show the average throughputs per sector <strong>for</strong> the basic configurationin Ped B and Ped A environments, respectively. The average throughput per sector isslightly better in the case <strong>of</strong> a Ped A channel than in a Ped B channel because the Ped A channelprovides better multiuser diversity due to larger variations in channel amplitude, which isexploited by the proportional fairness scheduler.The overall per sector throughput in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3) reuse is better when a directionalantenna is used at the MS, since the amount <strong>of</strong> cochannel interference is reduced by the directionalnature <strong>of</strong> the channel. However, in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,3,3) reuse, the additional directionality <strong>of</strong>the antenna at the MS in an interference-limited environment does not provide any significantbenefit, since (1,3,3) frequency reuse provides a sufficient geographical separation <strong>of</strong> cochannelBSs. It should be noted that in the case <strong>of</strong> noise-limited design—a design with larger cell radii—the gain <strong>of</strong> the directional antenna at the MS would provide an improvement in the sectorthroughput even with (1,3,3) frequency reuse.Figure 12.5 and Figure 12.6 show the probability distributions <strong>of</strong> per subchannel user DLdata rate <strong>for</strong> the Ped B and Ped A environments, respectively. One can conclude that in the case<strong>of</strong> (1,3,3) reuse, the fifth and tenth percentile data rates are much higher than the case <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3)reuse. This happens because in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3) reuse, a large percentage <strong>of</strong> MSs that arepresent toward the cell edge experience a low SINR, due to cochannel interference and thus alow data rate. Based on the per user data rate distribution it should be noted that although (1,1,3)reuse is more spectrally efficient, it is achieved at the price <strong>of</strong> poor per<strong>for</strong>mance at the cell edge.In order to achieve an acceptable cell-edge per<strong>for</strong>mance, (1,3,3) reuse or (1,1,3) reuse with segmentationis required. When segmentation is used, all the subchannel are divided into threegroups, and each <strong>of</strong> the three sectors is allocated one group <strong>of</strong> subchannels. Segmentation thusachieves an effective (1,3,3) reuse.The fifth and tenth percentile data rates can also be improved in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3) reuse byusing directional antennas at the MS, as shown in Figure 12.6. This controlled trade-<strong>of</strong>f betweennetwork reliability and spectral efficiency allows a system designer to choose the appropriatenetwork parameters, such as cell radius, frequency reuse, and antenna pattern, that will meet thedesign goal. From here on, we limit our discussion to the handheld-device scenario with (1,1,3)frequency reuse.Table 12.4 and Table 12.5 summarize the throughput per BS and the fifth and tenth percentiledata rates <strong>for</strong> the various scenarios. The throughput <strong>of</strong> all the sectors is combined to get thethroughput <strong>of</strong> the BS. Since a total <strong>of</strong> 30MHz <strong>of</strong> spectrum is assumed, as per Table 12.2, in thecase <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3) frequency reuse, we assume that each sector is allocated three 10MHz TDD channels.Although the average throughput channel is less in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,1,3) frequency reuse than<strong>for</strong> (1,3,3) reuse, the overall capacity is higher with (1,1,3) reuse, since each sector is allocatedthree channels as opposed to one channel in the case <strong>of</strong> (1,3,3) reuse. On the other hand, networkreliability is significantly improved by going from (1,1,3) reuse to (1,3,3) reuse.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!