Douglas - The CIA Covenant-Nazis in Washington - preterhuman.net

the generally ideological and plagiarized fictions which are inaccurately called history by their writers andpublishers.While there is still great interest in the Second World War in general, and Hitler in particular, thehistorical playing field is so tilted that there is but one direction for writers to run. The steady, andseeminglyunstoppable, downhill course has encouraged and rewarded sophistry at the expense of facts and truth.However, there very often is too much of a bad thing and the boy who persisted in shouting aboutnon-existent wolves was eventually eaten by them. And every few years, even though it seems to be byaccident rather than design, the search for historical truths wins a hearing in the public arena.“The Bell Curve,” published in 1994, contained convincing detail that empirically proved classstructure and IQ test scores are intimately linked. Somehow, it broke through the protective screens andhighly negative criticisms of knee-jerk liberal reviewers, and reached the higher rungs of the national bestsellerlists.However, it was quickly followed by several rapidly prepared works of a more politicallyacceptable view which claimed it is actually not IQ which matters but “emotional intelligence,” or moregraphically “street smarts” which is really the important factor in sociological and economic development.This specious and predictably dimwitted argument entirely missed the point the authors of “The BellCurve” made, namely there is indeed a well-documented and proven connection between class andintelligence. Socially correct writers have a standing aversion to inconvenient facts and lack the courage, orthe intelligence, to critically examine their own prejudices.A best-selling work by British author Colin Simpson about the sinking of the Lusitania in 1914,correctly attributed the rapid sinking of the passenger liner containing many neutral Americans to theexplosion of her cargo of a quarter million pounds of illegal explosives. The book was greeted by outragein official England and a book in response was hastily cobbled together by two Stanford Universityinstructors. The authors claimed that the sinking was due entirely to Teutonic barbarity and coal dust. Thisdefense was necessary because the orthodox point of view was that Churchill would never have indulgedin such terrible behavior as to permit the loading of a quarter million pounds of high explosives onto apassenger ship andknowingly permit her to sail into an area where German U-Boats were known to be operating, and tocompound this by ordering her escorts withdrawn. But the facts, as stubborn and inconvenient as they oftenare, show he did. It is an established fact that at least 80% of the American public believes that theassassination of President Kennedy was the result of a conspiracy of some type and not the mindlessactions of the lone gunman so frantically supported by officialdom and the so-called mainstream media.In 1993, Gerald Posner authored “Case Closed.” In this work, he slavishly presented andpromoted, in toto, the official government version of Kennedy’s assassination as accomplished andimmutable fact. Unlike the large number of books chronicling various conspiracy theories, Posner’s bookreceived high and frequent praise from the media because he trumpeted the version of events agreed uponby the government and the print media. Fortunately for historical accuracy, the effort sold very badly.Posner followed this disaster with another book, again setting forth and supporting the officialversion, on the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. Like the Kennedy work, it too was trumpeted bythe media as being the brilliant final word on a painful subject and like the Kennedy book, it too soldbadly.In general, it might be said with some accuracy that unautographed copies of officially approvedand sponsored history books are considered rare in the used book market.In spite of, or more likely because of, constant assaults by writers acting as unofficialgovernmental public relations outlets on their intelligence, the American public has grown to distrust theirgovernment and the media, and its public-relations firm.In the very rare occurrence when a controversial book that deals with official misconduct ordisastrous error is published by a mainstream printing house, it is never quite believed until officiallydenied by Washington officials. The axiom is that the higher the level of the deniers, the greater the degreeof belief.Canadian writer James Bacque wrote “Other Losses” in which he made an excellent case for thecomplicity of Gen. Eisenhower in the death by disease, starvation and neglect of tens of thousands ofGerman prisoners of war. His book was followed by a work by Stephen Ambrose, a fierce and well-paiddefender of the Allied Supreme Commander. Ambrose tried to refute Bacque¹s thesis, but did so by editinga tome of great moral outrage, almost as if he was trying to defend himself from the accusations, ratherthan