Douglas - The CIA Covenant-Nazis in Washington - preterhuman.net

In one, Sereny claims that Stangl’s wife wrote her a letter following an interview Sereny had withthe wife in Brazil. In this letter, which is not reproduced, Frau Stangl allegedly states that in 1945 she wasinterviewed by two members of the U.S. Army’s Counter Intelligence agency, and that they knew of herhusband’s whereabouts in an American jail. “I examined their papers,” she is quoted as writing, “I have nodoubt whatever that they were genuine.” The flaw in this scenario is obvious. It is simply not believablethat the wife of an obscure SS officer would have the slightest idea what “genuine” U.S. CIC identificationpapers looked like. But Sereny states that the woman would have no reason to invent the incident. Perhapsthe invention did not originate with Stangl’s wife, but with the author herself.At another point, Sereny introduced “Franciszek Zabecki” who she alleges was a Polish railroadworker, stationed in the vicinity of the Concentration Camp at Treblinka in German-occupied Poland.Sereny has this man counting all the trains carrying prisoners to the camp, standing outside in all kinds ofweather and at all hours for a period of two full years. From his unrecorded and highly questionablecomments, “Zabecki” states categorically that 1.2 million persons were killed in Treblinka during that time.It is anecdotal and imaginative material, at charitable best, that suffuses and supports the entireuntenable structure of this work. Unfortunately, a large proportion of what purports to be importanthistorical studies are based either on entirely faked documents or on the wishful thinking of mendaciousand ideological journalists. Generations must pass before the fictive is eventually weeded out from thefactual, and in the meantime an appellation which has been applied to the Sereny book, Dialogs with theDead, could well be applied to other mendacious creative writing essays herein studied.Sereny found the contents of sufficient concern to bring them to the attention of a major Britishnewspaper who duly commissioned her to write an article on the papers. Before progressing further withthis subject, seven important pages are transcribed so that their impact can be better understood.These papers are US Army Counter Intelligence (CIC) reports. They are dated November 30,1948and were prepared in the CIC Region VIII headquarters located in Berlin. The author of the initial reportwas one Severin F. Wallach, a CIC Special Agent and a Viennese-born Jew who specialized ininterrogations of German sources. Note: A facsimile of these papers will be found in the Appendix.)The cover sheet of the report is marked WD 341/1 Jun 47 and is a standard War Departmentreport form. It is headed “Agent Report” and was originally classified as “Secret”, a classificationsubsequently removed. Portions of this report are heavily censored and a full copy can be found in theAppendix.The subject is: “Former SS Generals MUELLER and GLOBOCNIK/ RE: Soviet Investigations/RE: Project UEBERSEE/3. The file number is ‘VIII-12203’.1. Recent investigations by special teams of Soviet agents in the Western Zones seeking definitiveinformation about the possible whereabouts of former SS Generals Heinrich MUELLER and OdiloGLOBOCNIK have apparently uncovered sufficient information to justify increased activity.2.Allegedly the Soviets have uncovered leads which cause them to suspect that the two abovenamed subjects were not killed at the end of the war. This is part of their ongoing probings in re(ference)the possible possession of the West of high level Nazi leaders wanted by the Soviets either for trial orpossible intelligence use by their agencies.3. Up to this point in time, Soviet efforts have been directed towards discovering the whereaboutsof HITLER, BORMANN and former SS General FEGELEIN. The Soviet view that these leaders fled fromBerlin in April/May of 1945 and are being harbored in the West has been officially and strongly denied bycareful coordination of all Western agencies concerned.4. As former chief of the GESTAPO, MUELLER is an especially attractive target for the Sovietsbut GLOBOCNIK, because of his connections with the concentration camp system in Poland is consideredto be a more valuable propaganda target.5. MUELLER’s value to Western intelligence is beyond doubt but continued protection ofGLOBOCNIK might prove to be an extreme embarrassment. British intelligence, because of theircooperation in the transfer of GLOBOCNIK, has become increasingly insistent that GLOBOCNIK eitherbe terminated at once or relocated in such a manner as to totally remove him from Soviet investigatorsareas of search. (Here is a handwritten comment: ‘approved’ and the initials ‘JST’)6. GLOBOCNIK’s value as an expert on partisan warfare has proven to be less than useful. Thecurrent projects he is involved in do not appear to be supplying the desired information or is the HistoricalSection (of the US Army) pleased with the quality of his information.7. Copies of British requests are attached herewith as are joint in-depth evaluations of theprobability of Soviet discovery of UEBERSEE 2 and 3. It should be noted that Soviet probes in Spain areof necessity, extremely clandestine in nature, due to the hostility of the Spanish Government but it has been