1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Overview Over ... - DSpace@UM

However, the results on Tables 4.12 and 4.12a below on the Multivariate analysis ofvariance (MANOVA) with Gender type as the fixed variable and the three groups ofcoping techniques Multivariate analysis shows that it is statistically significant at Wilks’Lambdavalue .791 Sig. .007. The Tests of between subject effects indicates thatFlight/fight Focus is statistically significant at Sig. .016.Table 4.12Multivariate Tests cEffect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.P4.3GENDER Pillai's Trace .212 3.011 6.000 152.000 .008Wilks' Lambda .791 3.113 a 6.000 150.000 .007Hotelling's Trace .260 3.212 6.000 148.000 .005Roy's Largest Root .244 6.174 b 3.000 76.000 .001SourceDependent VariableTable 4.12aTests of Between-Subjects EffectsType III Sum ofSquares df Mean Square F Sig.P4.3GENDER PROBLEM_P3 91.527 2 45.763 .746 .478FLIGHT/FIGHT_P3 65.669 2 32.834 4.376 .016EMOTION_P3 68.123 2 34.062 1.950 .149Nonetheless, when the test is executed with Ethnic type as the fixed variable and thethree methods of coping techniques on Multivariate analysis, shown in Table 4.13, it isstatistically significant with Wilks’s Lambda value .815 at Sig. value .019. Whereas, theTests of between subjects effects indicates it is not statistically significant among thevariables as results shown in Tables 4.13a.52