13.07.2015 Views

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34infiltrating water. Upconing of the deep saline water due to disturbances caused by theconstruction or during glacial periods is possible. According to a description of siteevolution (Pastina & Hellä 2006), maximum salinities at the repository level areexpected to remain below 20–25 g/L, with occasional higher values possible. Also,higher salinities may be permitted depending on material selection, as some backfillmaterials studied by Johannesson & Nilsson (2006) could provide enough swellingpressure even in higher salinities (7%).In addition to per<strong>for</strong>mance of the backfill material, emplacement of the backfill maycreate further requirements on the rock. These requirements may consider the salinity<strong>and</strong> inflow to a certain tunnel section as well to the point inflow. Per<strong>for</strong>mance tests onthe backfill concept have been carried out using maximum salinity of 35 g/L. Thedevelopment of backfilling materials <strong>and</strong> concept needs to be considered in the futurerevisions of per<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>and</strong> criteria.As the backfill will contain swelling material (either bentonite or Friedl<strong>and</strong> clay,Tanskanen 2007, see also Keto et al. 2009), the backfill material will pose similar hostrock requirements as the buffer:chemical environment that is favourable to backfill functionalitylow groundwater flow so that erosion will not take place or change the chemicalenvironmentsufficient repository depth in order to avoid freezing of the backfill or tominimise any adverse impact of the freezing of the backfill4.3.4 SummaryEBS functionality depends on the geochemical, hydrogeological <strong>and</strong> mechanicalconditions at the repository depth.With respect to the chemical environment, reducing conditions with no dissolvedoxygen (O 2 ) are required to avoid canister corrosion. Other corroding agents includesulphide (HS - ) <strong>and</strong> chloride (Cl - ) as well as nitrates <strong>and</strong> ammonia. Sulphide, present ingroundwater, the buffer <strong>and</strong> the backfill, is produced by sulphate-reducing bacteria inthe presence of organic matter, <strong>and</strong> by anaerobic methane oxidation involving bothmethane-oxidising bacteria <strong>and</strong> sulphate-reducing bacteria (sees e.g. Chapters 6 <strong>and</strong> 11in Pastina & Hellä 2006). To avoid chloride corrosion, the pH of groundwater must behigh enough, i.e. pH > 4 (SKB 2006).Chemical erosion of buffer can take place in the presence of groundwater with very lowionic strength. High salinity can impair buffer <strong>and</strong> backfill properties, especiallyswelling pressure <strong>and</strong> hydraulic conductivity. The presence of potassium can lead toillitisation of the buffer <strong>and</strong>, consequently, to a decrease in swelling pressure <strong>and</strong>increase in hydraulic conductivity (Pastina & Hellä 2006, SKB 2006). Iron is alsoconsidered to be detrimental to the long-term behaviour of the buffer as it may lead tochloritisation <strong>and</strong> other mineral alterations <strong>and</strong> to a reduced swelling pressure.Erosion of the buffer can take place when there is high inflow in the deposition hole ortunnel section. Currently, maximum allowable inflow to the deposition hole is estimatedto be in the order of 0.1 L/min (SKB 2006, Smith et al. 2007c, see also Section 5.2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!